Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MRI Findings in Trigeminal Neuralgia without Neurovascular Compression: Implications of Petrous Ridge and Trigeminal Nerve Angles

  • Hai Zhong (Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University) ;
  • Wenshuang Zhang (Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University) ;
  • Shicheng Sun (Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University) ;
  • Yifan Bie (Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University)
  • Received : 2021.10.04
  • Accepted : 2022.04.27
  • Published : 2022.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To determine the anatomical characteristics of the petrous ridge and trigeminal nerve in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) without neurovascular compression (NVC). Materials and Methods: From May 2017 to March 2021, 66 patients (49 female and 17 male; mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 56.8 ± 13.3 years) with TN without NVC and 57 controls (46 female and 11 male; 52.0 ± 15.6 years) were enrolled. The angle of the petrous ridge (APR) and angle of the trigeminal nerve (ATN) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging with a high-resolution three-dimensional T2 sequence. Data on the symptomatic side were compared with those on the asymptomatic side in patients and with the mean measurements of the bilateral sides in controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of APR and ATN in distinguishing TN patients from controls. Results: In TN patients without NVC, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of APR on the symptomatic side (98.40° ± 19.75°) was significantly smaller than that of the asymptomatic side (105.59° ± 22.45°, p = 0.019) and controls (108.44° ± 15.98°, p = 0.003). The mean ATN ± SD on the symptomatic side (144.41° ± 8.92°) was significantly smaller than that of the asymptomatic side (149.67° ± 8.09°, p = 0.003) and controls (150.45° ± 8.48°, p = 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for distinguishing TN patients from controls was 0.673 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.579-0.758) for APR and 0.700 (CI: 0.607-0.782) for ATN. The sensitivity and specificity using the diagnostic cutoff yielding the highest Youden index were 81.8% (54/66) and 49.1% (28/57), respectively, for APR (with a cutoff score of 94.30°) and 65.2% (43/66) and 66.7% (38/57), respectively, for ATN (cutoff score, 148.25°). Conclusion: In patients with TN without NVC, APR and ATN were smaller than those in controls, which may explain the potential cause of TN and provide additional information for diagnosis.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

References

  1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1-211  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202
  2. Rand RW. Gardner neurovascular decompression of the trigeminal and facial nerves for tic douloureux and hemifacial spasm. Surg Neurol 1981;16:329-332  https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(81)90264-0
  3. Revuelta-Gutierrez R, Lopez-Gonzalez MA, Soto-Hernandez JL. Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression: 20 years of experience. Surg Neurol 2006;66:32-36; discussion 36  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.10.018
  4. Lee SH, Levy EI, Scarrow AM, Kassam A, Jannetta PJ. Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia attributable to veins after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 2000;46:356-361; discussion 361-362  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00019
  5. Guo H, Song G, Wang X, Bao Y. Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with no neurovascular compression: a retrospective study and literature review. J Clin Neurosci 2018;58:42-48  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.066
  6. Kuncz A, Voros E, Barzo P, Tajti J, Milassin P, Mucsi Z, et al. Comparison of clinical symptoms and magnetic resonance angiographic (MRA) results in patients with trigeminal neuralgia and persistent idiopathic facial pain. Medium-term outcome after microvascular decompression of cases with positive MRA findings. Cephalalgia 2006;26:266-276  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01030.x
  7. Jannetta PJ. Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1967;26:159-162  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0159
  8. Klun B. Microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: personal experience with 220 patients. Neurosurgery 1992;30:49-52  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199201000-00009
  9. Adams CB, Kaye AH, Teddy PJ. The treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by posterior fossa microsurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982;45:1020-1026  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.45.11.1020
  10. Patel NK, Aquilina K, Clarke Y, Renowden SA, Coakham HB. How accurate is magnetic resonance angiography in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia? A prospective, single-blinded comparative study. Br J Neurosurg 2003;17:60-64  https://doi.org/10.1080/0268869031000093735
  11. Rath SA, Klein HJ, Richter HP. Findings and long-term results of subsequent operations after failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 1996;39:933-938; discussion 938-940  https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199611000-00010
  12. Zhao H, Zhang X, Tang D, Li S. Nerve combing for trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:e15-e16  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003161
  13. Sindou MP, Chiha M, Mertens P. Anatomical findings observed during microsurgical approaches of the cerebellopontine angle for vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia (350 cases). Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1994;63:203-207  https://doi.org/10.1159/000100316
  14. Ishikawa M, Nishi S, Aoki T, Takase T, Wada E, Ohwaki H, et al. Operative findings in cases of trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression: proposal of a different mechanism. J Clin Neurosci 2002;9:200-204  https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2001.0922
  15. Ruiz-Juretschke F, Gonzalez-Quarante LH, Garcia-Leal R, Martinez de Vega V. Neurovascular relations of the trigeminal nerve in asymptomatic individuals studied with high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2019;302:639-645  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23818
  16. Peker S, Dincer A, Necmettin Pamir M. Vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve is a frequent finding in asymptomatic individuals: 3-T MR imaging of 200 trigeminal nerves using 3D CISS sequences. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009;151:1081-1088  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0329-y
  17. Park SH, Hwang SK, Lee SH, Park J, Hwang JH, Hamm IS. Nerve atrophy and a small cerebellopontine angle cistern in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2009;110:633-637  https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.8.JNS08522
  18. Kakizawa Y, Seguchi T, Kodama K, Ogiwara T, Sasaki T, Goto T, et al. Anatomical study of the trigeminal and facial cranial nerves with the aid of 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 2008;108:483-490  https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/3/0483
  19. Magnaldi S, Cecconi P, Skrap M, Ricci C, Cova MA, Pozzi-Mucelli RS. Magnetic resonance in trigeminal neuralgia. Radiol Med 1992;83:700-705 
  20. Liang L, Diao Y, Xu Q, Zhang M. Transcranial segment of the trigeminal nerve: macro-/microscopic anatomical study using sheet plastination. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:605-612  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1920-9
  21. Krmpotic'-Nemanic' J, Vinter I, Hat J, Jalsovec D. Mandibular neuralgia due to anatomical variations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999;256:205-208  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050141
  22. Tubbs RS, May WR Jr, Apaydin N, Shoja MM, Shokouhi G, Loukas M, et al. Ossification of ligaments near the foramen ovale: an anatomic study with potential clinical significance regarding transcutaneous approaches to the skull base. Neurosurgery 2009;65(6 Suppl):60-64; discussion 64  https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000345952.64041.9C
  23. Liu P, Zhong W, Liao C, Liu M, Zhang W. Narrow foramen ovale and rotundum: a role in the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:2168-2170  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003021
  24. Guo H, Wang X, Song C, Song Z, Liang J, Song G, et al. Trigeminal neuralgia secondary to osteoid osteoma of the petrous bone: report of 4 cases and brief review of literature. World Neurosurg 2018;114:e713-e718  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.065
  25. Brinzeu A, Dumot C, Sindou M. Role of the petrous ridge and angulation of the trigeminal nerve in the pathogenesis of trigeminal neuralgia, with implications for microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018;160:971-976  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3468-1
  26. Araya EI, Claudino RF, Piovesan EJ, Chichorro JG. Trigeminal neuralgia: basic and clinical aspects. Curr Neuropharmacol 2020;18:109-119 https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X17666191010094350