Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Substitution Elasticity and Gains from Trade Variety in South Korea

  • Kichun Kang (School of Economics & Finance, Yeungnam University)
  • Received : 2022.04.19
  • Accepted : 2022.08.05
  • Published : 2022.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - Recent international studies have largely focused on measuring the welfare gains from increased trade varieties. To adequately capture the variety gains, it is of importance to estimate the elasticity of substitution between varieties of trade goods because it is one of the key parameters to determine the magnitude of the variety gains. Using the import data of South Korea, this paper shows that the elasticities vary substantially across the estimators, which affects the magnitude of the gains from trade. Design/methodology - Empirical studies working on the gains from trade variety have heavily depended on the estimation methods for the elasticity of substitution between trade varieties, developed by Feenstra (1994) and refined by Broda and Weinstein (2006). We estimate and compare the estimated elasticities for 8,945 HS 10 goods of South Korea, obtained from the three estimation methods: Feenstra's weighted least square (F-WLS), Feenstra's feasible generalized least square (F-FGLS), and Broda and Weinstein's feasible generalized least square (BW-FGLS). Findings - Using the estimated elasticities from the F-FGLS, considered as a suitable estimator, A typical Korean consumer saved 228 dollars per year by the greater access to new import varieties. This leads to gains from imported variety of 2.06% of GDP. In 2017, a typical Korean consumer would gain by 611 dollars, compared with 2000. China is the country with the largest contribution (28.4%), followed by Japan and USA. About 50% of all the welfare gains come from the imports from the three main trade partners. The Southern Asian countries are more important to the South Korean welfare gain than the Western European countries. Originality/value - Existing studies have chosen one of the methods without any criterion for the choice and then estimated the elasticities of substitution between varieties of trade goods. This paper focuses on the estimation specifications and methods as the cause of the disparity in estimated elasticities and welfare gains from trade variety. According to the Ramsey RESET and White tests, the F-FGLS estimates are relatively better compared to the F-WLS and BW-FGLS estimates. As another contribution, this paper provides the first measure of the welfare gains from trade variety for South Korea, using the estimated elasticities of substitution between trade varieties.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF- 2020S1A5A2A01040069), and 2020 Yeungnam University Research Grant.

References

  1. Anderson, J. and E. van Wincoop (2004), "Trade Costs", Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691-751. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177649
  2. Ardelean, A. and V. Lugovskyy (2010), "Domestic Productivity and Variety Gains from Trade", Journal of International Economics, 80, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.11.006
  3. Armington, P. (1969), "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production", IMF Staff Papers, 26, 159-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866403
  4. Arkolakis, C., S. Demidova, P. Klenow, and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2008), "Endogenous Variety and the Gains from Trade", American Economic Review, 98, 444-450. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.444
  5. Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2012), "New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?", American Economic Review, 102, 94-130. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.94
  6. Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, D. Donaldson, A. Rodriguez-Clare (2019), "The Elusive Procompetitive Effects of Trade", Review of Economic Studies 86, 46-80.
  7. Broda, C., and D. Weinstein (2008), "Globalization and the Gains from Variety", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 541-585. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541
  8. Broda, C., J. Greenfield, and D. Weinstein (2017), "From Groundnuts to Globalization: A Structural Estimate of Trade and Growth", Research in Economics, 71, 759-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2017.10.001
  9. Brooks, W. and P. Pujolas (2019), "Gains from Trade with Variable Trade Elasticities", International Economic Review, 60, 1619-1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12399
  10. Chaney, T. (2008), "Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade", American Economic Review, 98, 1707-1721. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1707
  11. Chen, B. and H. Ma (2012), "Import Variety and Welfare Gain in China", Review of International Economics, 20, 807-820.
  12. Feenstra, R. (1994), "New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices", American Economic Review, 84, 157-177.
  13. Feenstra, R. (2010), "Measuring the Gains from Trade under Monopolistic Competition", Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01577.x
  14. Feenstra, R. and D. Weinstein (2017), "Globalization, Markups and U.S. Welfare", Journal of Political Economy, 125, 1040-1074. https://doi.org/10.1086/692695
  15. Feenstra, R. (2018), "Alternative Sources of the Gains from International Trade: Variety, Creative Destruction, and Markups", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.25
  16. Feenstra, R., P. Luck, M. Obstfeld, and K. Russ (2018), "In Search of the Armington Elasticity", Review of Economics and Statistics, 100, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00696
  17. Fontagne, L., P. Martin, and G. Orefice (2018), "The International Elasticity Puzzle is Worse than You Think", Journal of International Economics, 115, 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.08.011
  18. Hansen, L. (1982), "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators", Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
  19. Heathcote, J. and F. Perri (2002), "Financial Autarky and International Business Cycles", Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 601-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00103-4
  20. Hummels, D. and P. Klenow (2005), "The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Exports", American Economic Review, 95, 704-723.
  21. Imbs, J. and I. Mejean (2015), "Elasticity Optimism", American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7, 43-83. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20130231
  22. Kang, K. (2019), "The Adjustment Effect of the Extensive Margin on the Terms of Trade during Economic Crises", Economics Letters 176, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.11.026
  23. Kemp, M. (1962), "Errors of Measurement and Bias in Estimates of Import Demand Parameters", Economic Record 38, 369-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1962.tb01431.x
  24. Klenow, P. and A. Rodriguez-Clare (1997), "The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has it Gone Too Far?", NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 12, 73-103. https://doi.org/10.1086/654324
  25. Krugman, P. (1980), "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade", American Economic Review, 70, 950-959.
  26. Melitz, M. and S. Redding. (2015), "New Trade Models, New Welfare Implications", American Economic Review, 105, 1105-46.
  27. Mohler, L. and M. Seitz (2012), "The Gains from Variety in the European Union", Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 148, 475-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0126-1
  28. Ossa, R. (2015), "Why Trade Matters After All?", Journal of International Economics, 97, 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.07.002
  29. Romalis, J. (2007), "NAFTA's and CUSFTA's Impact on International Trade", Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 416-435. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.416
  30. Soderbery, A. (2010), "Investigating the Asymptotic Properties of Import Elasticity Estimates", Economics Letters, 109, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.08.006
  31. Soderbery, A. (2015), "Estimating Import Supply and Demand Elasticities: Analysis and Implications", Journal of International Economics, 96, 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.01.003
  32. Soderbery, A. (2018), "Trade Elasticities, Heterogeneity, and Optimal Tariffs", Journal of International Economics, 114, 44-62.