Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제54권12호
  • /
  • Pages.4715-4721
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new approach for modeling pulse height spectra of gamma-ray detectors from passing radioactive cloud in a case of NPP accident

  • R.I. Bakin (Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE RAN)) ;
  • A.A. Kiselev (Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE RAN)) ;
  • E.A. Ilichev (Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE RAN)) ;
  • A.M. Shvedov (Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE RAN))
  • 투고 : 2021.06.21
  • 심사 : 2022.08.11
  • 발행 : 2022.12.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A comprehensive approach for modeling the pulse height spectra of gamma-ray detectors from passing radioactive cloud in a case of accident at NPP has been developed. It involves modeling the transport of radionuclides in the atmosphere using Lagrangian stochastic model, WRF meteorological processor with an ARW core and GFS data to obtain spatial distribution of radionuclides in the air at a given moment of time. Applying representation of the cloud as superposition of elementary sources of gamma radiation the pulse height spectra are calculated based on data on flux density from point isotropic sources and detector response function. The proposed approach allows us to obtain time-dependent spectra for any complex radionuclide composition of the release. The results of modeling the pulse height spectra of the scintillator detector NaI(Tl) Ø63×63 mm for a hypothetical severe accident at a NPP are presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA, General Safety Requirements Part 3, Vienna, Austria, 2014.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Programs and Systems for Source and Environmental Radiation Monitoring, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2010. Safety Reports Series No. 64.
  3. SP AS-03 Sanitary Rules for Design and Operation Nuclear Power Plants, SanPin 2.6.1.24-03, Moscow, Russia, 2003 [in Russian].
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency, En Vironmental and Source Monitoring for Purposes of Radiation Protection, 2016. IAEA, Safety Standards Series no. RS-G-1.8, Vienna, Austria.
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency, International Radiation Monitoring Information System: User Manual IRMIS Version 3.0.0, IAEA, EPR-IEComm Attachment 2, Vienna, Austria, 2020.
  6. IBRAE RAN Proceedings, Issue 15: Development of Emergency Response and Radiation Monitoring Systems, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 2013 [in Russian].
  7. Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Radiation Situation at Rosatom Enterprises, Moscow, Russia [cited March 2021], Available from, https://www.russianatom.ru/.
  8. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Nationalwide Environmental Radiation Monitoring, RadNet System, Washington, US [cited March 2021], Available from, https://www.epa.gov/radnet.
  9. European Radiological Data Exchange Platform, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission [cited February 2021], Available from, https://remon.jrc.ec.europa.eu/About/Rad-Data-Exchange.
  10. International Atomic Energy Agency, Operational Intervention Levels for Reactor Emergencies and Methodology for Derivation, IAEA, EPR-NPP-OILs, Vienna, Austria, 2017. ISSN 2518-685X, no. 479.
  11. Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Derived Intervention Levels in the Case of an Accident at a Nuclear Power Plant, FMBA Guidelines, MU 2.6.1.047-08, Moscow, Russia, 2008 [in Russian].
  12. S.A. Korolev, Yu.E. Lavrukhin, O.V. Rumyantsev, Application of remote gamma spectrometry in automated systems for monitoring emissions from nuclear power plants, At. En. 106 (2009) 43-49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-009-9129-y.
  13. S. Levinson, U. German, O. Pelled, Y. Laichter, Prediction of a NaI(Tl) pulse height spectra near a radioactive plume, following a nuclear accident, 20th Regional Congress Isr. Radiat. Prot. Assoc. 16-20 (1997) 236-239. Tel Aviv, Israel, Nov.
  14. Y. Terasakaa, H. Yamazawaa, J. Hirouchia, S. Hiraoa, H. Sugiuraa, J. Moriizumia, Yu. Kuwahara, Air concentration estimation of radionuclides discharged from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station using NaI(Tl) detector pulse height distribution measured in Ibaraki Prefecture, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 53 (2016) 1919-1932, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2016.1193453.
  15. D.S. Grozdov, V.P. Kolotov, Yu.E. Lavrukhin, Computation of full energy peak efficiency for nuclear power plant radioactive plume using remote scintillation gamma-ray spectrometry, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 110 (2016) 118-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.01.014.
  16. Yu.E. Lavrukhin, A.V. Sokolov, D.S. Grozdov. Monitoring of radon volumetric activity in the surface atmospheric layer using the readings of the SEG-017 γ-spectrometer: error analysis, in: Proceedings of the Conference Radioactivity after Nuclear Explosions and Accidents: Consequences and Ways of Overcoming, Obninsk, Russia, April 19-21, 2016, pp. 359-368 ([in Russian]).
  17. M.W. McNaughton, J.M. Gillis, E. Ruedig, J.J. Whicker, D.P. Fuehne, Gamma-ray dose from an overhead plume, Health Phys. 112 (2017) 445-450, https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000000643.
  18. W. Skamarock, J. Klemp, J. Dudhia, et al., Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR, 2008. Technical Note NCAR/TN-475+STR.
  19. R.V. Arutyunyan, V.V. Belikov, G.V. Belikova, et al., Nostradamus computer system for supporting decisions during accidental emissions at radiation hazardous objects, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Energetika 4 (1995) 19-30.
  20. R.I. Bakin, I.M. Gubenko, K.S. Dolganov, R. Y Ignatov, E.A. Ilichev, A.A. Kiselev, S.N. Krasnoperov, P.A. Konyaev, K.G. Rubinshtein, D.Y. Tomashchik, Application of ensemble method to predict radiation doses from a radioactive release during hypothetical severe accidents at Russian NPP, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 58 (2020) 635-650, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2020.1854879.
  21. Environmental Modeling Center, The GFS Atmospheric Model, Global Climate and Weather Modeling Branch, EMC, Camp Springs, Maryland, US, 2003. NCEP Office Note 442..
  22. L.A. Bolshov, K.S. Dolganov, A.E. Kiselev, V.F. Strizhov, Results of SOCRAT code development, validation and applications for NPP safety assessment under severe accidents, Nucl. Eng. Des. 341 (2019) 326-345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.013.
  23. I.M. Sobol, Monte Carlo Numerical Methods, Nauka, Moscow, 1973 [in Russian].
  24. M.P. Panin, Simulation of Radiation Transport, MEPhI, Moscow, 2008 [in Russian].
  25. W.L. Dunn, J.K. Shultis, Exploring Monte Carlo Methods, Elsevier, 2011.
  26. I. Murata, R. Shindo, S. Shiozawa, Importance determination method for geometry splitting with Russian roulette in Monte Carlo calculations of thick and complicated core shielding structure, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 32 (1995) 971-980, https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1995.9731805.
  27. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Radionuclide transformations - energy and intensity of emissions, ICRP publication 38, Ann. ICRP (1983) 11-13.
  28. G.R. Gilmore, Practical Gamma-Ray Spectrometry, second ed., Wiley, Chichister, UK, 2008.