과제정보
AS and RKJ worked on conception, drafting, review design, and interpretation of data. The critical revision was done by RKJ and RN. The interpretation of data for the quantitative analysis was confirmed by AB.
참고문헌
- Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 8: 873-9.
- Dula K, Mini R, Lambrecht JT, van der Stelt PF, Schneeberger P, Clemens G, et al. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 123-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00190.x
- Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 55-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-832X(95)90642-C
- Shroff B. Biology of orthodontic tooth movement: current concepts and applications in orthodontic practice. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.
- Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 416-24.
- Marquezan M, Lau TC, Mattos CT, Cunha AC, Nojima LI, Sant'Anna EF, et al. Bone mineral density. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 62-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/031811-192.1
- Silva IM, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Boscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 550-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000600011
- Miles DA, Danforth RA. A clinician's guide to understanding cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI). Santa Monica, CA: Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology; 2008.
- Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 767-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01677.x
- Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e1-7.
- Pauwels R, Nackaerts O, Bellaiche N, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, et al. Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20120135. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20120135
- Azeredo F, de Menezes LM, Enciso R, Weissheimer A, de Oliveira RB. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 147-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.013
- Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 871-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x
- Sarkis A, Noujeim M, Nummikoski P. Bone density measurements in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: e53.
- Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: principles, techniques and clinical applications. Cham: Springer; 2018.
- Shahlaie M, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 1. Quantitative computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 224-31.
- Eguren M, Holguin A, Diaz K, Vidalon J, Linan C, Pacheco-Pereira C, et al. Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2022; 51: 20210140. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210140
- DeGhett VJ. Effective use of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient: an additional point. Animal Behaviour 2014; 98: e1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.006
- Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 503-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x
- Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 323-35. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/19603304
- Razi T, Niknami M, Alavi Ghazani F. Relationship between Hounsfield unit in CT scan and gray scale in CBCT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014; 8: 107-10.
- Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, Motroni A, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 1438-42.
- Bujtar P, Simonovics J, Zombori G, Fejer Z, Szucs A, Bojtos A, et al. Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014; 117: 768-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.02.012
- Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Shirotsu K, Honda E, Sumi Y, Kurabayshi T. Stability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral content. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 543-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02420.x
- Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 558-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01896.x
- Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Barbato E. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 471-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12027
- Chindasombatjaroen J, Kakimoto N, Shimamoto H, Murakami S, Furukawa S. Correlation between pixel values in a cone-beam computed tomographic scanner and the computed tomographic values in a multidetector row computed tomographic scanner. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 662-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31822d9725
- Varshowsaz M, Goorang S, Ehsani S, Azizi Z, Rahimian S. Comparison of tissue density in Hounsfield units in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13: 108-15.
- Patrick S, Birur NP, Gurushanth K, Raghavan AS, Gurudath S. Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with Hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2017; 28: 66-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_415_16
- Razi T, Emamverdizadeh P, Nilavar N, Razi S. Comparison of the Hounsfield unit in CT scan with the gray level in cone-beam CT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2019; 13: 177-82. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.028
- Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 420-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.049
- Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys 2001; 28: 469-74. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1357457
- Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140224. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140224
- Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(4 Suppl): S130-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.015