Journal of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Evaluation of Ultrasonographic Equipment Using an ATS-539 Multipurpose Phantom in Veterinary Medicine

  • Cho, Young-kwon (Department of Radiologic Science, Cheongju University) ;
  • Lee, Youngjin (Department of Radiologic Science, Gachon University) ;
  • Lee, Kichang (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2022.03.02
  • Accepted : 2022.05.16
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the status of quality control using multipurpose phantom of ultrasound equipment used in hospital of veterinary college in South Korea by using ATS-539 multipurpose phantom so as to examine quantitative and objective new image evaluation method. Specialists discussed and analyzed multipurpose phantom images acquired by using convex transducer of 10 ultrasound imaging devices, currently used in 9 veterinary colleges, at 4.0-6.0 MHz. Total 8 items that can be measured with ATS-539 multipurpose phantom including dead zone, vertical and horizontal measurement, axial/lateral resolution, sensitivity, focal zone, functional resolution and gray scale/dynamic range were evaluated. For qualitative evaluation, valid decisions were made based on dead zone, axial/lateral resolution, and gray scale/dynamic range which are resolution index, and coefficient of variation (COV) and blind referenceless image spatial quality evaluator (BRISQUE) were found to increase objectivity. As a result of experiment, all the targeted ultrasonic devices were found appropriate from qualitative evaluation items of dead zone, axial/lateral resolution, and gray scale/dynamic range. In other evaluation items, they were found to be appropriate from focal zone and vertical measurement of quantitative evaluation while inappropriate from horizontal measurement, sensitivity, and functional resolution. COV value was 0.12 ± 0.04, and BRISQUE value was 47.77 ± 2.77, both analysis results show that the noise level of all ultrasonic devices was located within tolerance range. Upon image examination using ATS-539 multipurpose phantom, they were 100% appropriate with inspection standards of dead zone, axial/lateral resolution, and gray scale/dynamic range, and besides, focal zone and functional resolution can be used as evaluation items. In the field of veterinary medicine, 8 standard items using ATS-539 multipurpose phantom and image evaluation items using COV and BRISQUE can be used as standards for quality control of ultrasonography machine.

Keywords

References

  1. Adhikari S. High-frequency transducers for point-of-care ultrasound applications: what is the optimal frequency range? Intern Emerg Med 2014; 9: 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-013-1014-y
  2. Babu J, Sudha GF. Adaptive speckle reduction in ultrasound images using fuzzy logic on Coefficient of Variation. Biomed Signal Process Control 2016; 23: 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2015.08.001
  3. Bok TH, Paeng DK. High frequency ultrasound and its applications to animal and human imaging focusing on vessel and blood. J Acoust Soc Korea 2010; 29: 73-85.
  4. Choi JI, Kim PN, Jeong WK, Kim HC, Yang DM, Cha SH, et al. Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma: an initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 1221-1229. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1221
  5. Dong KR, Bae SH, Lee WH, Kweon DC, Goo EH, Chung WK. Performance evaluation of ultrasonography using ATS-539 multipurpose phantom. J Adv Eng Technol 2010; 3: 133-137.
  6. Fabiszewska E, Pasicz K, Grabska I, Skrzynski W, Slusarczyk-Kacprzyk W, Bulski W. Evaluation of imaging parameters of ultrasound scanners: baseline for future testing. Pol J Radiol 2017; 82: 773-782. https://doi.org/10.12659/PJR.904135
  7. Goodsitt MM, Carson PL, Witt S, Hykes DL, Kofler JM Jr. Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 1. Med Phys 1998; 25: 1385-1406. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598404
  8. Jung JJ, Choi JH, Jung JH. Image quality control for linear transducers with various frequencies by using an ATS-550 phantom. J Korean Phys Soc 2017; 28: 206-212. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.206
  9. Kim CS, Kang SS, Kim JH. Evaluation of quantitative image quality using frequency and parameters in the ultrasound image. J Korean Soc Radiol 2016; 10: 247-253. https://doi.org/10.7742/JKSR.2016.10.4.247
  10. Kim MJ, Lee JS, Ko SJ, Kang SS, Kim JH, Kim DH, et al. Evaluation of image quality using ATS-539 phantom and SNR in the ultrasonographic equipment. J Korea Contents Assoc 2013; 13: 284-291. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.08.284
  11. Kim PN, Lim JW, Kim HC, Yoon YC, Sung DJ, Moon MH, et al. Quality assessment of ultrasonographic equipment using an ATS-539 multipurpose phantom. J Korean Soc Radiol 2008; 58: 533-541. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2008.58.5.533
  12. Kim SH, Seo KH, Kang SH, Kim JH, Choi WH, Lee YJ. Feasibility study of improved patch group prior based denoising (PGPD) technique with medical ultrasound imaging system. J Magn 2017; 22: 55-59. https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.1.055
  13. Lee S, Choi JI, Park MY, Yeo DM, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. Intra- and interobserver reliability of gray scale/dynamic range evaluation of ultrasonography using a standardized phantom. Ultrasonography 2014; 33: 91-97. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.13021
  14. Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 2012; 21: 4695-4708. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050
  15. Thijssen JM, Weijers G, de Korte CL. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.006