Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국수산과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Population parameters and sustainable status of lompa fish Thryssa baelama (Forsskal, 1775) manage through sasi approach at Haruku Village

  • Tetelepta, Johannes M.S. (Departmentt of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Pattimura University) ;
  • Natan, Yuliana (Departmentt of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Pattimura University) ;
  • Pattikawa, Jesaja A. (Departmentt of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Pattimura University) ;
  • Bernardus, Agil S. (Departmentt of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Pattimura University)
  • Received : 2021.06.22
  • Accepted : 2022.01.10
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The harvesting season of lompa fish, Thryssa baelama, through sasi, indigenous knowledge in resources management, in Haruku Village has become a socio-cultural event that attracts many people. The sasi of lompa fish has been conducted for hundreds of years. Information on the bioecology aspect of lompa fish is limited, while this information is crucial for lompa fish sustainability through the sasi approach. This study aimed to investigate some population parameters of lompa fish, its sustainability status, and proposed a sustainable management strategy for the lompa fishery of Haruku Village. Fish population parameter covers length-weight relationship, growth pattern, size distribution, sex ratio, and the body condition index. The sustainability status was assessed following the Rapfish approach. Fisheries management strategy was performed using a conceptual model framework based on Driver Pressure State Impact Response. The research shows that the total length varies between 9.2-14.3 cm. A high relationship was found between total length and weight, and the growth pattern was an allometric negative. There was a difference in sex ratio between males and females, with females dominant. The body condition index varies over time, probably due to reproductive status. The overall sustainability status was at fair condition (61.60%), with the ecological domain having the highest sustainable status (71.07%) and considered sustain. In comparison, the technological domain had the lowest sustainability status (52.58%) and was considered fair sustain. There were seven management strategies proposed for sustainable management for the lompa fishery.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Kewang of Haruku Village, particularly the Kewang Chief, Mr. Eliza Kyssia, for providing the opportunity to do this study and the people of Haruku Village for their hospitality during the research.

References

  1. Adaka G, Ndukwe E, Nlewadim A. Length-weight relationship of some fish species in a tropical rainforest river in South-East Nigeria. Transylv Rev Syst Ecol Res. 2015;17:73-8. https://doi.org/10.1515/trser-2015-0065
  2. Adhuri DS. How can traditional marine resource management support a responsible fishery? Lesson learned from Maluku. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics & Trade (IIFET); 2004; Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Aditriawan RM, Runtuboy N. Length-weight relationship and condition factor of common ponyfish, Leiognathus equulus (Forsskal, 1775) in Pabean Bay, Indramayu, West Java. J Iktiologi Indones. 2017;17:311-6. https://doi.org/10.32491/jii.v17i3.368
  4. Angel E, Edwards DN, Hawkshaw S, Wor C, Parlee CE. An indicator framework to support comprehensive approaches to sustainable fisheries management. Ecol Soc. 2019;24:12.
  5. Apel AM, Fujita R, Karr K. Science-based management of data-limited fisheries: a supplement to the catch share design manual [Internet]. Environmental Defense Fund. 2013 [cited 2021 Oct 31]. https://fisherysolutionscenter.edf.org/sites/catchshares.edf.org/files/CSDM_Sup_Data_Limited_Fisheries.pdf
  6. Arra S, Sylla S, Kouame AC, Zan-BI TT, Ouattaraw M. Reproductive biology of the African moonfish, Selene dorsalis (Gill, 1862) (Carangidae) in continental shelf of Cote d'Ivoire fishery (West Africa). Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 2018;6:358-63.
  7. Bahri T, Vasconcellos M, Welch DJ, Johnson J, Perry RI, Ma X, et al. Adaptive management of fisheries in response to climate change. Rome, FAO; 2021. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 667.
  8. Bagenal TB, Tesch FW. Age and growth. In: Bagenal TB, editor. Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. 3rd ed. Oxford: IBP Handbook No. 3, Blackwell Science; 1978.
  9. Balzan MV, Pinheiro AM, Mascarenhas A, Moran-Ordonez A, Ruiz-Frau A, Carvalho-Santos C, et al. Improving ecosystem assessments in Mediterranean social-ecological systems: a DPSIR analysis. Ecosyst People. 2019;15:136-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1598499
  10. Baptista V, Campos CJA, Leitao F. The influence of environmental factors and fishing pressure on catch rates of Diplodus vulgaris. Estuaries Coasts. 2016;39:258-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-9990-y
  11. Batiran K, Salim I. A tale of two kewangs: a comparative study of traditional institutions and their effect on conservation in Maluku. For Soc. 2020;4:81-97.
  12. Benedict OO, Yemi AS, Isaac TO. Length-weight relationship, condition factor and sex ratio of forty six important fishes in a tropical flood river. Res J Fish Hydrobiol. 2009;4:65-72.
  13. Bradley D, Merrifield M, Miller KM, Lomonico S, Wilson JR, Gleason MG. Opportunities to improve fisheries management through innovative technology and advanced data systems. Fish Fish. 2019;20:564-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12361
  14. Breen M, Graham N, Pol M, He P, Reid D, Suuronene P. Selective fishing and balanced harvest. Fish Res. 2016;184:2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.03.014
  15. Camara A, Santero-Sanchez R. Economic, social, and environmental impact of a sustainable fisheries model in Spain. Sustainability. 2019;11:6311. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226311
  16. Clarke KR, Gorley RN, Somerfield PJ, Warwick RM. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 3rd ed. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E; 2014.
  17. Cremers K, Wright G, Rochette J. Strengthening monitoring, control and surveillance of human activities in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction: challenges and opportunities for an international legally binding instrument. Mar Policy. 2020;122:103976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103976
  18. De Giosa M, Czerniejewski P, Rybczy A. Seasonal changes in condition factor and weight-length relationship of invasive Carassius gibelio (Bloch, 1782) from Leszczynskie Lakeland, Poland. Adv Zool. 2014;2014:678763.
  19. Diaz ME, Figueroa R, Alonso MLS, Vidal-Abarca MR. Exploring the complex relations between water resources and social indicators: the Biobio basin (Chile). Ecosyst Serv. 2018;31:84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.010
  20. Dineshbabu AP, Muthiah C, Sasikumar G, Rohit P, Bhat US. Impact of non-selective gears on kingseer, Scomberomorus commerson fishery in Karnataka. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci. 2012;41:3:265-71.
  21. Dunbar A, Mungai D, Muthee JK. Factors influencing the sustainable utilization of artisanal fisheries: a case of west point, Liberia. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 2021;9:52-9. https://doi.org/10.22271/fish.2021.v9.i2a.2442
  22. Effendie MI. Biologi perikanan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Yayasan Pusaka Nusantama; 1997.
  23. Elliott M, Burdon D, Atkins JP, Borja A, Cormier R, de Jonge VN, et al. "And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!": a unifying framework for marine environmental management. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017;118:27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.049
  24. Ernst B, Chamorro J, Manriquez P, Orensanz JML, Parma AM, Porobic J, et al. Sustainability of the Juan Fernandez lobster fishery (Chile) and the perils of generic science-based prescriptions. Glob Environ Change. 2013;23:1381-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.002
  25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO; 2020.
  26. Flewwelling P. Fisheries management and MCS in South Asia: comparative analysis. Rome: FAO; 2001.
  27. Froese R, Pauly D. Thryssa baelama (Forskal, 1775) [Internet]. Fishbase. 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 19]. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/582
  28. Froese R. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol. 2006;22:241-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x
  29. Gari SR, Newton A, Icely JD. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coastal Manag. 2015;103:63-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013
  30. Geffroy B, Wedekind C. Effects of global warming on sex ratios in fishes. J Fish Biol. 2020;97:596-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14429
  31. Halls AS, Mustafa MG, Dickson M. Community-based fisheries management approach adopted in Bangladesh. Adv Res. 2017;11:1-17.
  32. Harkes I. An institutional analysis of sasi laut, a fisheries management system in Indonesia [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2021 October 31]. http://pubs.iclarm.net/Pubs/Way%20Forward/19%20Harkes.pdf
  33. Harkes I, Novaczek I. Presence, performance, and institutional resilience of sasi, a traditional management institution in Central Maluku, Indonesia. Ocean Coast Manag. 2002;45:237-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00057-1
  34. Hauge KH, Cleeland B, Wilson DC. Fisheries depletion and collapse [Internet]. International Risk Government Council Report. 2009 [cited 2021 Oct 2021]. https://irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Fisheries_Depletion_full_case_study_ web.pdf
  35. Hasan NH. Preserving and development the myth of lompa fish: Live-Straus structuralism review. Ambon, Indonesia: Kantor Bahasa Maluku Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 2017.
  36. Hilborn R, Amoroso RO, Anderson CM, Baum JK, Branch TA, Costello C, et al. Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status [Internet]. PNAS Latest Article. 2020;117:2218-24.
  37. Hoda SMS. Reproductive biology and length-weight relationship of Thryssa dussumieri (Valenciennes) of the Pakistan coast. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 1976;18:272-87.
  38. Holden MJ, Raitt DFS. Manual of fishery science, part 2 methods of resource investigation and their application. Rome: FAO; 1974. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 115, Rev. 1.
  39. Hutchings JA, Reynolds JD. Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. BioScience. 2004;54:297-309. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0297:MFPCCF]2.0.CO;2
  40. Jisr N, Younes G, Sukhn C, El-Dakdouki MH. Length-weight relationships and relative condition factor of fish inhabiting the marine area of the Eastern Mediterranean city, Tripoli-Lebanon. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2018;44:299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2018.11.004
  41. Karepisina SS, Susilo E, Indrayani E. Customary law existence in the protection of lompa fish sasi at Haruku Village, Cenral Maluku District. ECSOFiM. 2017;1;1:25-41.
  42. Kamal MM, Ernawati Y, Dewi NN. Length at first maturity, spawning time, and reproductive output in the females of Hamilton's anchovy (Thryssa hamiltonii Gray, 1835). J Biol Tropis. 2020;20:1-6. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v20i1.1623
  43. Kavanagh P, Pitcher TJ. Implementing microsoft excel software for Rapfish: a technique for the rapid appraisal of fisheries status. Vancouver, BC: Fisheries Center; 2004.
  44. Kell LT, Luckhurst BE. Extending the indicator-based ecosystem report card to the whole ecosystem; a preliminary example based on the Sargasso Sea. Collect Vol Sci Pap ICCAT. 2018;75:258-75.
  45. Kende DR, Nirmale VH, Gurjar UR, Qayoom U, Syed N, Pawar RA. Biometric analysis of moustached Thryssa mystax (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) along the Ratnagiri coast of Maharashtra, India. Indian J Fish. 2020;67:2:110-3.
  46. King M. Fisheries biology, assessment and management. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  47. Kissya E. Sasi aman Haru-ukui: Traditional management of sustainable natural resources in Haruku. Jakarta: Sejati Foundation; 1995.
  48. Lellotery H, Hitipeuw JC, Sahusilawane J. The role of traditional conservation towards bird species biodiversity in 543 some villages of South Leitimur sub-district. Jurnal Agroforestri. 2007;2:34-40.
  49. Mahapatra BK, Pradhan A, Lakra WS. Morphometrics, length-weight relationship and condition factor of Coilia dussumieri Valenciennes, 1848 from North-East coast of India. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 2015;3:35-9.
  50. Marichamy R. Maturity and spawning of the anchovy, Thrissina baelama (Forskal) from the Andaman sea. Indian J Fish. 1970;17:179-87.
  51. Marjanto DK. The cultural valus exist in the tradition of lompa fish sasi in Haruku Village, Central Maluku District. Patrawidya. 2015;16:311-326.
  52. Martin DM, Piscopo AN, Chintala MM, Gleason TR, Berry W. Developing qualitative ecosystem service relationships with the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response framework: a case study on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Ecol Indic. 2018;84:404-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.047
  53. McDonald G, Harford B, Arrivillaga A, Babcock EA, Carcamo R, Foley J, et al. An indicator-based adaptive management framework and its development for data-limited fisheries in Belize. Mar Policy. 2017:76:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.027
  54. Mazumder SK, Das SK, Bakar Y, Ghaffar MA. Effects of temperature and diet on length-weight relationship and condition factor of the juvenile Malabar blood snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus Bloch & Schneider, 1801). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2016;17:580-90. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1500251
  55. Nair PG, Joseph S, Kripa V, Pillai VN. Population growth and maturity characteristics of Commerson's anchovy (Stolephorus commersonnii Lacepede, 1803) along the southwest coast of India. Indian J Geo Mar Sci. 2021;50:141-7.
  56. Nallu Chinnappan I, Jeyabaskaran Y. Observations on the biology of Thryssa mystax off Tuticorin coast, Gulf of Mannar, east coast of India. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 1991;33:49-54.
  57. Natan Y, Tetelepta JMS, Pattikawa JA, Ongkers OTS. Incorporating the ecological, socio-economic and institutional conceptual model framework for sustainable management of small-scale mud crab (Scylla serrata) fishery in Western Seram Regency, Indonesia. Environ Nat Resour J. 2021;19:207-19. https://doi.org/10.32526/ennrj/19/2020189
  58. Nikijuluw VPH. Community-based fishery management (sasi) in Central Maluku. Indones Agric Res Dev J. 1995;17:33-9.
  59. Nilsson M, Chisholm E, Griggs D, Howden-Chapman P, McCollum D, Messerli P, et al. Sustain Sci. 2018;13:1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
  60. Novaczek I, Harkes IHT, Sopacua J, Tatuhey MDD. An institutional analysis of Sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia. Penang, Malaysia: ICLARM; 2001. ICLARM Technical Report 59.
  61. Pauly D. Fish population dynamics in tropical waters: a manual for use with programmable calculators. Penang, Malaysia: ICLARM; 1984. ICLARM Contribution No. 143.
  62. Pawase SV, Nirmale VH, Bhosale BP, Pawar RA, Sawant MS, Kende DR. Study on biology of Thryssa dussumieri (Valenciennes, 1848) from the coast of Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India. Indian J Geo Mar Sci. 2020;49:87-94.
  63. Persada NPR, Mangunjaya FM, Tobing ISL. Sasi as cultural natural resources conservation in Maluku Province. Jurnal Ilmu dan Budaya. 2018;41;59:6869-900.
  64. Pitcher TJ. RAPFISH, a rapid appraisal technique for fisheries, and its application to the code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Rome: FAO; 1999. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 947.
  65. Pitcher TJ, Kalikoski D, Short K, Varkey D, Pramoda G. An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries. Mar Policy. 2009;33:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.06.002
  66. Pitcher TJ, Lam ME, Ainsworth C, Martindale A, Nakamura K, Perry RI, et al. Improvements to Rapfish: a rapid evaluation technique for fisheries integrating ecological and human dimensions. J Fish Biol. 2013;83:865-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12122
  67. Pitcher TJ, Preikshot D. RAPFISH: a rapid appraisal technique to evaluate the sustainability status of fisheries. Fish Res. 2001;49:255-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00205-8
  68. Porobic J, Fulton EA, Parada C, Frusher S, Ernst B, Manriquez P. The impact of fishing on a highly vulnerable ecosystem, the case of Juan Fernandez Ridge ecosystem. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0212485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212485
  69. Remesan MP, Pravin P, Meenakumari B. Non-selective fishing gears and sustainability issues in the Hooghly-Maltah estuary in West Bengal, India. Asian Fish Sci. 2009;22:297-308.
  70. Shomura RS. Collection of tuna baitfish papers. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce; 1977. NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 408.
  71. Soselisa HL. Sasi lompa: a critical review of the contribution of local practices to sustainable marine resource management in Central Maluku, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;339:012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/339/1/012013
  72. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principle and procedure of statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Mc-Graw-Hill; 1980.
  73. Talakua W. Change in productivity of sasi lompa area in Haruku Village, Pulau Haruku Sub-district, Central 605 Maluku Regency. Jurnal Triton. 2011;7;2:71-8.
  74. Weber CT, Borit M, Aschan M. An interdisciplinary insight into the human dimension in fisheries models. A systematic literature review in a European Union context. Front Mar Sci. 2019;6:369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00369
  75. Zador ZG, Gaichas SK, Kasperski S, Ward CL, Blake RE, Ban NC, et al. Linking ecosystem processes to communities of practice through commercially fished species in the Gulf of Alaska. ICES J Mar Sci. 2017;74:2024-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx054
  76. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall International; 2014.