한국중재학회지:중재연구 (Journal of Arbitration Studies)

한국중재학회 (The Korean Association of Arbitration Studies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국제상사중재에서 중재합의의 준거법 결정기준 - 영국 대법원의 2021년 Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group 판결을 중심으로 -

The Governing Law of Arbitration Agreements Issues in International Commercial Arbitration : A Case Comment on Kabab-Ji Sal (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48

  • 투고 : 2022.05.10
  • 심사 : 2022.05.31
  • 발행 : 2022.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

On 27 October the Supreme Court of UK handed down its much anticipated decision in Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48. The issues for the Supreme Court to decide were as follows: (1) which law governed the validity of the arbitration agreement; (2) if English law applied, whether, as a matter of English law, there was any real prospect that a court might find that KFG became a party to the arbitration agreement, and (3) whether, procedurally, the Court of Appeal was correct in giving summary judgment refusing recognition and enforcement the award, or whether there should have been a full rehearing of whether there was a valid and binding arbitration agreement for the purposes of the New York Convention and the AA 1996 (the 'procedural' issue) The decision in Kabab-Ji provides further reassuring clarity on how the governing law of the arbitration agreement is to be determined under English law where the governing law is not expressly stated in the arbitration agreement itself. The Supreme Court's reasoning is consistent with its earlier decision on the same issue, albeit in the context of enforcement pursuant to the New York Convention, rather than considering the arbitration agreement before an award is rendered. This paper presents some implications of Kabab-Ji case. Also, it seeks to provide a meaningful discussion and theories on the arbitration system in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강수미, "중재합의의 성립 내지 효력에 관한 준거법", 「중재연구」, 제16권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2006.
  2. 김갑유 외 (편), 「중재실무강의」, 개정판, 박영사, 2017.
  3. 김갑유, "중재합의의 유효성판단과 그 준거법 - 대법원 2001.10.12.선고, 99다45543판결", 「인권과 정의」, 제331호, 대한변호사협회, 2004.
  4. 김용길, "중재합의의 효력범위에 관한 고찰 - 대법원 2011.12.22. 선고 2010다76573 판결을 중심으로", 「중재연구」, 제23권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2013.
  5. 목영준.최승재, 「상사중재법」, 개정판, 박영사, 2018.
  6. 손경한, "중재합의의 준거법과 주관적 중재적격성 - 동진쎄미켐중재사건을 중심으로", 「국제사법연구」, 제23권 제1호, 한국국제사법학회, 2017.
  7. 석광현, 「국제상사중재법연구」 제1권 , 박영사, 2007.
  8. 석광현, "국제상사중재에서 중재합의의 준거법", 「법학논총」, 제24권 제1호, 한양대학교 법학연구소, 2007.
  9. 이강빈, "국제중재에 있어서 중재합의의 준거법 결정에 관한 연구", 「중재연구」, 제15권 제2호, 한국중재학회, 2005.
  10. 하현수, "중국의 중재합의 준거법 결정 기준에 관한 연구", 「무역금융보험연구 , 제22권 제4호, 한국무역보험학회, 2021.
  11. 한나희.하충룡, "국제물품매매에서 중재조항 성립의 해석에 관한 고찰", 「중재연구」, 제27권 제4호, 한국중재학회, 2017.
  12. Baltag, Crina, & Mihaela Maravela, "Applicable Law to Arbitration Agreement and No Oral Modification Clause: Case Note on the Decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal, 20 January 2020," Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2020.
  13. Balthasar, Stephan, International Commercial Arbitration, Beck/Hart, 2016.
  14. Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern, & Martin Hunter, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 6th ed., Oxford University Press, 2015.
  15. Born, Gary B., International Commercial Arbitration Vol. III: International Arbitral Awards, 2nd ed., Kluwer Law International, 2014.
  16. Derains, Yves, "The ICC Arbitral Process - Part VIII: Choice of Law Applicable to the Contract and International Arbitration," ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995.
  17. Lew, Julian D., "The Law Applicable to the Form and Substance of the Arbitration Clause," ICCA Congress Series, No. 9, 1999.
  18. Moses, Margaret L., "A New Framework: Choosing the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement Based on the Issue to be Decided," in Arbitration, Contracts and International Trade Law: Essays in Honour of Giorgio Bernini, Giuffre, 2021.
  19. Nataf, Samantha, "Jurisdiction over Non-signatories, the Irreconcilable Approaches of French and English Courts Case Note on: (i) English Court of Appeal Decision of 20 January 2020 and (ii) Paris Court of Appeal Decision of 23 June 2020," ASA Bulletin, Vol. 38, Iss. 4, 2020.
  20. Redfern, Alan, Martin Hunter, Nigel Blackaby, & Constantine Partasides, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 4th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2004.
  21. Risvas, Michail, "International Law as the Basis for Extending Arbitration Agreements Concluded by States or State Entities to Non-Signatories," International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 71, Iss. 1, 2022.
  22. Sutton, David St, John, Judith Gill, & Matthew Gearing, Russell on Arbitration, 24th ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2015.
  23. Yang, Jim Teo & Darius Chan, "Ascertaining the Proper Law of an Arbitration Agreement: The Artificiality of Inferring Intention When There Is None," Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 37, Iss. 5, 2020.