DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship Between Flexible Work Arrangements and Work-Life Balance - With a Focus on Working From Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic

유연근무제와 근로자의 일·생활균형 - 코로나19 이후 재택근로 확산의 영향을 중심으로

  • Received : 2022.03.23
  • Accepted : 2022.05.02
  • Published : 2022.05.31

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between flexible work and workers' work-life balance using data from the 23rd Korean Labor and Income Panel Study, with a focus on the impact of working from home (WFH) during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the analysis, WFH was found to have a positive effect on the happiness of workers, satisfaction with family relationships, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction related to job security for women. In addition, we looked at the changes in time use of WFH workers and non-WFH workers before and after COVID-19, with a particular focus on aspects such as time spent sleeping and on self-development, childcare, housework, exercise, and social gatherings. Compared to non-WFH workers, WFH workers increased the time spent on housework and childcare after COVID-19, with this trend more pronounced among women. The results of this study suggest that the effect of utilizing WFH may be halved for workers who have to take care of children and work at the same time, and that this effect may be greater for women. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen social support measures so that WFH workers who face a work-life conflict due to childcare can maintain work productivity and realize a work-life balance, and to ensure that the flexible work arrangement should not be a medium that reinforces traditional gender roles. Active policy efforts will be required to make sure this happens.

본 연구에서는 한국노동패널 23차 부가조사 자료를 이용하여 유연근무제와 근로자의 일·생활균형의 관계에 대해 코로나 19 이후 재택근로 확산의 영향을 중심으로 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 재택근무제는 근로자의 행복도 및 가족관계 만족도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 여성의 경우 직무만족도와 조직몰입도, 일자리 안정성과 관련한 직무 만족도에도 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 또한, 재택근무자와 비재택근무자의 코로나19를 전후로 한 시간활용 변화를 수면시간, 자기계발시간, 자녀돌봄, 가사노동, 운동, 친교모임 등 다양한 측면에서 살펴보았는데, 가장 큰 특징은 재택근무자가 비재택근무자에 비해 코로나19 이후 가사노동 시간과 자녀돌봄 시간이 더욱 크게 증가하였다는 점이며 이러한 경향은 여성에게서 더욱 크게 나타났다. 본 연구의 분석 결과는 재택근무제의 효과가 자녀돌봄과 일을 병행해야 하는 근로자들에게는 그 효과가 반감될 수 있으며, 그 영향은 여성에게 더 클 수 있음을 시사한다. 따라서 자녀돌봄 등으로 인해 일·생활갈등 상황에 놓인 재택근로자들이 업무생산성을 유지하고 일·생활균형을 실현할 수 있도록 사회적 지원을 강화할 필요가 있으며, 유연근무제도가 전통적 성역할을 강화하는 매개체가 되지 않도록 적극적인 정책적 노력이 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김지현(2021). 유연근무제도 사용이 기혼 여성 관리자의 일-삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 업무시간외근무와 배우자 협조의 조절효과 검증. 사회보장연구, 37(3), 5-40.
  2. 홍승아(2012). 일.가정양립의 관점에서 본 유연근무제: 전략적 선택인가, 젠더 함정인가?. 가족과 문화, 24(4), 135-165.
  3. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M. & Shockley, K. M.(2013). Work-family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
  4. Blau, P.(1964). Power and Exchange in Social Life. NY: New York: J Wiley & Sons.
  5. Chung, H. & Van der Lippe, T.(2018). Flexible Working, Work-Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151, 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
  6. Derks, D. & Bakker, A. B.(2010). The Impact of E-mail Communication on Organizational Life. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1).
  7. Edwards, L. N. & Field-Hendrey, E.(2002). Home-based Work and Women's Labor Force Decisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 170-200. https://doi.org/10.1086/323936
  8. Edwards, J. R. & Rothbard, N. P.(2000). Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship between Work and Family Constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791609
  9. Ernst Kossek, E. & Ozeki, C.(1998). Work-family conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.139
  10. Ezra, M. & Deckman, M.(1996). Balancing Work and Family Responsibilities: Flextime and Child Care in the Federal Government. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/977205
  11. Gallie, D. & Russell, H.(2009). Work-Family Conflict and Working Conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 445-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9435-0
  12. Goldin, C.(2021). Assessing Five Statements about the Economic Impact of COVID-19 on Women. Technical Report. URL https://www.nber.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/GOLDIN_SEANWhitePaper.pdf.
  13. Kelliher, C. & Anderson, D.(2010). Doing more with less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of Work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
  14. Kim, H. K.(2014). Work-Life Balance and Employees' Performance: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment. Global Business and Management Research, 6(1), 37.
  15. Lott, Y.(2020). Does Flexibility help Employees Switch off from Work? Flexible Working-Time Arrangements and Cognitive Work-to-Home Spillover for Women and Men in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2031-z
  16. Lott, Y. & Chung, H.(2016). Gender Discrepancies in the Outcomes of Schedule Control on Overtime hours and Income in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 752-765. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw032
  17. Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A. & Baltes, B. B.(2011). Antecedents of Work-Family Conflict: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.695
  18. Nakrosiene, A., Buciuniene, I. & Gostautaite, B.(2019). Working from Home: Characteristics and Outcomes of Telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172
  19. Peters, P., Tijdens, K. G. & Wetzels, C. (2004). Employees' opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption. Information and Management, 41(4), 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00085-5
  20. Scandura, T. A. & Lankau, M. J.(1997). Relationships of Gender, Family Responsibility and Flexible Work hours to Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial. Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199707)18:4<377::AID-JOB807>3.0.CO;2-1
  21. Schieman, S. & Young, M.(2010). Is there a Downside to Schedule Control for the Work-Family Interface?. Journal of Family Issues, 31(10), 1391-1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10361866
  22. Sullivan, C. & Lewis, S.(2001). Home-Based Telework, Gender, and the Synchronization of Work and Family: Perspectives of Teleworkers and their Co-residents. Gender, Work & Organization, 8(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00125
  23. Tausig, M. & Fenwick, R.(2001). Unbinding Time: Alternate Work Schedules and Work-Life Balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016626028720
  24. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L. & Van Der Lippe, T.(2010). Effective Work-life Balance Support for Various Household Structures. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20340
  25. Thomas, L. T. & Ganster, D. C.(1995). Impact of Family-Supportive Work Variables on Work-Family Conflict and Strain: A Control Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6
  26. Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S. & Kacmar, K. M.(2007). Work-Family Facilitation: A Theoretical Explanation and Model of Primary Antecedents and Consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.01.002
  27. Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M. & Berdahl, J. L.(2013). Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012