DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

제주도 침입외래생물 Nutria (Mycastor coypus Molina, 1782)의 퇴치 사례 보고 - 제주시 송당지역의 사례 -

Report on the Eradication of Nutria (Myocastor coypus Molina, 1782), an Invasive Alien Species, from Jeju-do, South Korea - Case of Songdang-ri, Jeju-si -

  • 김가람 (제주대학교 대학원 과학교육학부) ;
  • 이준원 (제주대학교 대학원 과학교육학부) ;
  • 박선미 (제주대학교 기초과학연구소) ;
  • 최성환 (제주대학교 차세대융복합과학기술협동과정) ;
  • 정영훈 (제주대학교 차세대융복합과학기술협동과정) ;
  • 오홍식 (제주대학교 과학교육학부)
  • Ga-Ram Kim (Faculty of science Education, Jeju National University) ;
  • Jun-Won Lee (Practical Translational Research Center, Jeju National University) ;
  • Seon-Mi Park (Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Advanced Convergence Technology and Science, Jeju National University) ;
  • Sung-Hwan Choi (Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Advanced Convergence Technology) ;
  • Young-Hun Jung (and Science, Jeju National University) ;
  • Hong-Shik Oh (Faculty of science Education, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.07
  • 심사 : 2022.11.24
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31

초록

본 연구는 제주특별자치도에 유입된 Myocastor coypus Molina, 1782 (Nutria)의 퇴치를 위해 이루어졌다. 서식확인 및 퇴치는 2013년 9월부터 2013년 11월까지 이루어졌고, 그후 퇴치 성공여부를 확인하기 위해 2022년 6월까지 조사가 이루어졌다. 서식 확인 및 포획은 무인카메라, 청문조사, 문헌조사, 먹이유인을 통한 트랩 포획법을 사용하여 진행하였다. 후속조사는 Nutria의 행동반경을 감안하여 조사범위를 비교적 넓게 설정하여 서식지역(퇴치지역)을 중심으로 4.0km2 내 습지 및 하천 조사를 진행하였다. 그 결과 서식 확인지역은 제주특별자치도 제주시 구좌읍 송당리 소재의 송당목장에서만 발견되었으며, 방목장 내 수로와 연못에서 서식흔적(족적, 배설물, 굴)이 확인되었다. 포획개체는 총 8개체였으며, 암컷 4개체, 수컷 3개체였다. 1개체는 서식확인 시 확인되어 부패 정도가 심해 암·수의 구별이 어려웠다. 후속조사는 설정한 조사범위 내 항시 물이 있는 성읍저수지, 천미천, 몰순이못을 중심으로 서식지와 그 주변을 정밀조사하였으나 서식흔적이 확인되지 않았다. 따라서, 제주도에 서식하는 Nutria는 완전히 퇴치된 것으로 판단된다. 제주특별자치도에서 Nutria의 퇴치가 성공적으로 이루어진 것은 Nutria의 서식 확인 후 빠른 포획을 통해 정착단계 초기에 퇴치가 이루진 것과 제주도 지질 특성상 물이 항시 고여있는 습지가 드물어 확장의 시기가 늦어진 것이 시너지 효과를 일으켜 성공적인 퇴치가 이루어진 것으로 판단된다. 이 결과들은 외래종의 유입에 대한 대처는 그 종의 생태특성을 신속하게 파악하고, 올바른 대처를 통해 확장단계 이전 정착 초기 단계에서 관리 및 퇴치를 통해 교란이 일어나기 전 또는 교란 초기에 차단하는 것이 매우 효과적인 방법임을 시사한다.

This study was conducted to eliminate Myocastor coypusMolina, 1782 (Nutria) from Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, South Korea. Habitat identification and eradication were carried out from September to November 2013, and a survey was carried out until June 2022 to check whether the eradication was successful. The habitat was identified with unmanned cameras, interviews, and literature surveys, and the capture was performed using the trapping method with food to attract nutria to the habitat area. The study area for the follow-up survey, which was set relatively wide considering nutria's home range, included wetlands and rivers within 4.0 km2 of the habitat area (eradication area). As a result, nutria's habitat was confirmed only at Songdang Ranch, Songdang-ri, of Jeju Island, with traces of habitat (footprints, excrement, and burrows) confirmed in waterways and ponds within the pasture. Eight individuals were captured, including four females, three males, and one individual in too advanced a state of decay to identify the sex. The follow-up survey thoroughly investigated the habitat and its surroundings, focusing on three areas with permanent water, Seongeup Reservoir, Cheonmi Creek, and Molsuni Pond, but no signs of habitat were identified. Therefore, it is determined that nutria inhabiting Jeju Island has been completely eradicated. It is believed that the successful eradication of nutria in the Jeju Special Autonomous Region was possible due to a synergy between 1) the eradication of nutria at the beginning of the settlement phase through rapid capture after confirming the nutria habitat and 2) the delayed expansion period because of rare presence of wetlands, where water is constantly stagnant, on Jeju Island. These results imply that quickly identifying the ecological characteristics of the species and preventing disturbances before they or at the beginning of the ecological disturbance through control and eradication at the initial stage of settlement before the expansion stage is an effective measure to cope with the influx of alien species.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 정부(환경부)의 재원으로 영산강유역환경청의 제주지역 뉴트리아의 분포실태 조사 및 포획사업(제2015-36호)의 지원을 받아 수행되었다

참고문헌

  1. Abbas, A.(1988) Impact du ragondin (Myocastor coypus Molina) sur une culture de mais (Zea may L.) dans Ie marais Poitevin (Impact of nutria (Myocastor coypus Molina) on a corn crop (Zea may L.) in the Poitevin marsh). Acta Oecologica/Oecologica Applicata 9(2): 173-189.
  2. Banks, N.C., D.R. Paini, K.L. Bayliss and M. Hodda(2015) The role of global trade and transport network topology in the human- mediated dispersal of alien species. Ecology Letters 18(2): 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12397
  3. Bounds, D.L.(2000) Nutria: An invasive species of national concern. Wetland Journal 12: 9-16.
  4. Cabrera, A. and J. Yepes(1940) Mamiferos SudAmericanos (vida, costumbres descripcion) (South American mammals (life, customs, description). Compania Argentina de Editores, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  5. Carter, J. and B.P. Leonard(2002) A review of the literature on the world distribution, spread of, and efforts to eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildlife Society Bulletin 30: 162-175.
  6. D'adamo, P., M.L. Guichon and R.F. Bo(2000) Habitat use by coypu Myocastor coypus in agrosystems of the Argentinean Pampas. Acta Theriologica 45: 25-33. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.00-3
  7. Gosling, L.M.(1979) The twenty-four hour activity cycle of captive coypus (Myocastor coypus). Journal of Zoology 187(3): 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1979.tb03374.x
  8. Jeju Green Environment Center(2013) A study on Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, inland wetlands of D/B creation data. Jeju Green Environment Center, Korea, 442pp. [Korean Literature]
  9. Jung, W.Y. and S.K. Yang(2009) Simulation on runoff of rivers in Jeju Island using SWAT model. Journal of Environmental Science International 18(9): 1045-1055.
  10. Kil, J.H., D.H. Lee and Y.C. Kim(2015) Effective management of invasive nutria (Myocastor coypus) in the UK and the USA. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2(4): 265-273. https://doi.org/10.17820/ERI.2015.2.4.265
  11. Kil, J.H., Y.H. Kim, D.G. Kim, H.M. Kim, D.H. Lee, S.M. Hwang, C.W. Lee and B.G. Yang(2012) Monitoring of invasive alien species designated by the wildlife protection act (VI). National Institute of Environmental Research, 184pp. [Korean Literature]
  12. Kil, J.H., Y.H. Kim, H.M. Kim, D.H. Lee, C.W. Lee, S.M. Hwang, D.E. Kim and M.J. Kim(2011) Monitoring of invasive alien species designated by the wildlife protection act (V). National Institute of Environmental Research, pp.5-61. [Korean Literature]
  13. Kim, G.R. and H.S. Oh(2017) Biological characteristics and current status of nutria (Myocastor coypus) introduced in Jeju Island. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment 26(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2017.26.1.1
  14. Kinler, N.W.(1992) Historical and biological overview. In: Nutria and Muskrat Management Symposium. Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. pp.8-9.
  15. Lee, D.H., J.H. Kil and B.K. Yang(2012) Ecological characteristics for the sustainable management of Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Korea. National Institute of Environmental Research, 59pp. [Korean Literature]
  16. Linscombe, G., N. Kinler and V. Wright(1981) Nutria population density and vegetative changes in brackish marsh in coastal Louisiana. Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings 1: 129-171.
  17. Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas and M. De Poorter(2000) 100 of the World's worst invasive alien species: A selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland, New Zealand.
  18. Milholland, M.T., J.P. Shumate, T.R. Simpson and R.W. Manning(2010) Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Big Bend National Park; A non-native species in desert wetlands. Texas Journal of Science 62(3): 205-222.
  19. Ministry of Environment(2010) A study on the development of effective eradication measures through nutria habitat ecology survey. Ministry of Environment, Korea, 71pp. [Korean Literature]
  20. Ministry of Environment(2014) The first national mid-long term management plan of alien species (2014-2018). Ministry of Environment, Korea, 164pp. [Korean Literature]
  21. Miyazaki, T., Y. Naritsuka, M. Yagami, S. Kobayashi and K. Koichi(2022) Anatomy and histology of the eye of the nutria Myocastor coypus: evidence of adaptation to a semi-aquatic life. Zoological Studies 61.
  22. Nathan, H.W., M.N. Clout, J.W. MacKay, E.C. Murphy and J.C. Russell(2015) Experimental island invasion of house mice. Population Ecology 57: 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-015-0477-2
  23. National Institute of Ecology(2015) Alien species in Jeju Island, Korea. National Institute of Ecology, Korea, pp.38-39. [Korean Literature]
  24. National Institute of Environmental Research(2008) Alien species in Korea. National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea, pp.35-38. [Korean Literature]
  25. National Institute of Environmental Research(2011) The 3rd national ecosystem survey-Songdang (386083). National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea, pp.132-135. [Korean Literature]
  26. Russell, J.C. and K.G. Broome(2016) Fifty years of rodent eradications in New Zealand: Another decade of advances. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 40: 197-204. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.40.22
  27. Russell, J.C., H.R. Binnie, J. Oh, D.P. Anderson and A. Samaniego-Herrera(2017) Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(1): 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12753
  28. Schitoskey, F.J., J. Evans and G.K. Lavoie(1972) Status and control of nutria in California. Proceedings Vertebrate Pest Conference 5: 15-17.
  29. Shigesada, N. and K. Kawasaski(1997) Biological invasions: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press, UK, 205pp.
  30. Williamson, M.(1996) Biological invasions. Springer Science & Business Media.
  31. Wilson, M.E.(1995) Travel and the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerging Infectious Diseases 1(2): 39-46. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0102.950201
  32. Woods, C.A., L. Contreras, G. Willner-Chapman and H.P. Whidden(1992) Myocastor coypus. Mammalian Species 398: 1-8.