Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제55권3호
  • /
  • Pages.213-225
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceptions of the General Public About Health-related Quality of Life and the EQ-5D Questionnaire: A Qualitative Study in Korea

  • Ock, Minsu (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Pyo, Jeehee (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jo, Min-Woo (Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Herdman, Michael (Office of Health Economics) ;
  • Luo, Nan (Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.29
  • 심사 : 2022.05.04
  • 발행 : 2022.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate how members of the general public in Korea interpret the concept of health, and which dimensions of health are most important to them. We also explored their perceptions of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D), including the EuroQoL visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). Methods: We conducted face-to-face, in-depth interviews with 20 individuals from the general population, using a semi-structured interview guide. Content analysis was performed with verbatim transcripts and field notes to identify codes and categorize them according to their similarities and associations. Results: In total, 734 different codes were derived and classified into 4 categories. Participants cited the importance of both the mental and physical aspects of health, although they emphasized that the physical aspects appeared to play a larger role in their conceptualization of health. Participants noted that the EQ-5D has the advantage of being composed of 5 dimensions that are simple and contain both physical and mental areas necessary to describe health. However, some of them mentioned the need to add more dimensions of mental health and social health. Participants showed great satisfaction with the visually well-presented EQ-VAS. However, participants opined that the EQ-VAS scores might not be comparable across respondents because of different ways of responding to the scale. Conclusions: While physical health is a fundamental aspect of health, mental and social aspects are also important to Koreans. The content of the EQ-5D broadly matched the attributes of health considered important by Koreans.

키워드

과제정보

The authors are grateful to those who participated in indepth interviews.

참고문헌

  1. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 2009;374(9687):369-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61400-8
  2. Ock M, Han JW, Lee JY, Kim SH, Jo MW. Estimating quality-adjusted life-year loss due to noncommunicable diseases in Korean adults through to the year 2040. Value Health 2015;18(1):61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.008
  3. Jia H, Zack MM, Thompson WW. State quality-adjusted life expectancy for U.S. adults from 1993 to 2008. Qual Life Res 2011;20(6):853-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9826-y
  4. Trask PC, Hsu MA, McQuellon R. Other paradigms: health-related quality of life as a measure in cancer treatment: its importance and relevance. Cancer J 2009;15(5):435-440. https://doi.org/10.1097/ppo.0b013e3181b9c5b9
  5. World Health Organization. WHO definition of health [cited 2017 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution.
  6. Bakas T, McLennon SM, Carpenter JS, Buelow JM, Otte JL, Hanna KM, et al. Systematic review of health-related quality of life models. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012;10:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-134
  7. Revicki DA, Kleinman L, Cella D. A history of health-related quality of life outcomes in psychiatry. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2014;16(2):127-135. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.2/drevicki
  8. Emery MP, Perrier LL, Acquadro C. Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database (PROQOLID): frequently asked questions. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-12
  9. Chen TH, Li L, Kochen MM. A systematic review: how to choose appropriate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in routine general practice? J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2005;6(9):936-940. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2005.B0936
  10. EuroQol Research Foundation. About EQ-5D [cited 2017 Sep 6]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/.
  11. Kim TH, Jo MW, Lee SI, Kim SH, Chung SM. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Qual Life Res 2013;22(8):2245-2253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0331-3
  12. Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stobel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Brahler E. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual Life Res 2014;23(2):443-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0498-2
  13. Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, Jo MW. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea. Qual Life Res 2012;21(6):1065-1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0018-1
  14. Kangwanrattanakul K, Gross CR, Sunantiwat M, Thavorncharoensap M. Exploration of a cultural-adaptation of the EQ-5D for Thai population: a "bolt-on" experiment. Qual Life Res 2019;28(5):1207-1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2072-4
  15. Kangwanrattanakul K, Gross CR, Sunantiwat M, Thavorncharoensap M. Adding two culture-specific 'bolt-on' dimensions on the Thai version of EQ-5D-5L: an exploratory study in patients with diabetes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2019;19(3):321-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2019.1525294
  16. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(6):349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  17. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15(9):1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  18. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1981, p. 75-91.
  19. Jeon GS, Jang SN, Kim DS, Cho SI. Widowhood and depressive symptoms among Korean elders: the role of social ties. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013;68(6):963-973. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt084
  20. Silverstein M, Cong Z, Li S. Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China: consequences for psychological well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61(5):S256-S266. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.5.S256
  21. Wang JJ, Snyder M, Kaas M. Stress, loneliness, and depression in Taiwanese rural community-dwelling elders. Int J Nurs Stud 2001;38(3):339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00072-9
  22. Lee GL, Tan RL, Herdman M, Luo N. Assessing the content validity of the EQ-5D questionnaire among Asians in Singapore: a qualitative study. Ann Acad Med Singap 2020;49(5):294-305. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmed.sg.2019248
  23. Gurkova E. Issues in the definitions of HRQoL. J Nurs Soc Stud Public Health Rehabil 2011;3(4):190-197.
  24. Jormfeldt H. Supporting positive dimensions of health, challenges in mental health care. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2011;6(2):7126. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v6i2.7126
  25. Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(1):69-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt228
  26. Kang YW, Ko YS, Kim YJ, Sung KM, Kim HJ, Choi HY, et al. Korea community health survey data profiles. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2015;6(3):211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2015.05.003
  27. Gandhi M, Ang M, Teo K, Wong CW, Wei YC, Tan RL, et al. A vision 'bolt-on' increases the responsiveness of EQ-5D: preliminary evidence from a study of cataract surgery. Eur J Health Econ 2020;21(4):501-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01156-w
  28. Geraerds AJ, Bonsel GJ, Janssen MF, de Jongh MA, Spronk I, Polinder S, et al. The added value of the EQ-5D with a cognition dimension in injury patients with and without traumatic brain injury. Qual Life Res 2019;28(7):1931-1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02144-6
  29. Yang Y, Rowen D, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Young T, Longworth L. An exploratory study to test the impact on three "bolt-on" items to the EQ-5D. Value Health 2015;18(1):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.004
  30. Tan RL, Yang Z, Igarashi A, Herdman M, Luo N. How do respondents interpret and view the EQ-VAS? A qualitative study of three Asian populations. Patient 2021;14(2):283-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00452-5
  31. Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 2002;54(1):11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00003-X
  32. Skjerning H, Mahony RO, Husby S, DunnGalvin A. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: patient-driven data from focus group interviews. Qual Life Res 2014;23(6):1883-1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0623-x
  33. Bullinger M, Quitmann J, Power M, Herdman M, Mimoun E, DeBusk K, et al. Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-76