Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회지)

The Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Elastic Taping and Non-elastic Taping on Static Balance Control Ability, Dynamic Balance Control Ability, and Navicular bone Drop in Young Adults

  • Lim, Jong-Gun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Woo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Lee, Dongyeop (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Hong, Ji-Heon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Yu, Jae-Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Seop (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Gil (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Sunmoon University)
  • Received : 2021.12.15
  • Accepted : 2022.05.03
  • Published : 2022.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of the low dye taping technique on the static and dynamic balancing ability and navicular bone drop when the low dye taping technique was divided into elastic and non-elastic taping. METHODS: The subjects of the study were 31 volunteers without musculoskeletal disorders. The length (L) and anterior (A), posteromedial, and posterolateral values of the arch in the NO (normal eyes open), NC (normal eyes closed), PO (pillow with eyes open), and PC (pillow with close eyes closed) states were evaluated when barefoot and when Kinesio tape and non-elastic tape were applied. The measurements were analyzed using repeated ANOVA and an independent t-test. Post hoc tests were performed using a Fisher's LSD. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the arch L and A values using a foot scanner (p < .05). In addition, there was a significant difference in dynamic balance in the three directions (p < .05), and no difference was found in the case of static balance. As a result, non-elastic tape application helps improve the dynamic balance ability and arch of the foot. CONCLUSION: The non-elastic tape technique is helpful for the foot arch function, and there is no difference in the static balance ability between Kinesio tape and non-elastic tape. Nevertheless, non-elastic tape is more helpful for the dynamic balance ability than Kinesio taping.

Keywords

References

  1. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system; Foundation for rehabilitation. Mosby & Elsevier. 2010.
  2. Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, & An KN. Three-dimensional analysis of flatfoot deformity: cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(7):447-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079801900705
  3. Kosashvili Y, Fridman T, Backstein D, et al. The correlation between pes planus and anterior knee or intermittent low back pain. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(9):910-3. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2008.0910
  4. Wall K, Swanik K, Swanik C, et al. Augmented low-dye arch taping affects on muscle activity and ground reaction forces in people with pes planus. J Athlet Train. 2005;40(2):97.
  5. Flores DV, Mejia Gomez C, Fernandez Hernando M, et al. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: anatomy, biomechanics, staging, and imaging findings. Radiographics. 2019;39(5):1437-60. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190046
  6. Mecagni C, Smith JP, Roberts KE, et al. Balance and ankle range of motion in community-dwelling women aged 64 to 87 years: a correlational study. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):1004-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.10.1004
  7. Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson BF, et al. The effect of forefoot varus on postural stability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(2):79-85. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2004.34.2.79
  8. Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2014.
  9. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice (4th ed). USA. Lippincott Willians & Wilkins. 2014.
  10. Park MC. The effect of low-dye taping on muscle activity during single-leg standing in people with flatfoot. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2013;8(4):533-8. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2013.8.4.533
  11. Lee SM, Lee DY, Hong JH, et al. The effect of elastic and non-elastic tape on flat foot. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015;8(26):1-5.
  12. Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Kraszewski AP, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait posture. 2013;37(3):445-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.007
  13. Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Griffths GD, et al. Plantar tissue thickness is related to peak plantar pressure in the high-risk diabetic foot. Diabetes care. 2001;24(7):1270-4. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.7.1270
  14. Citaker S, Gunduz AG, Guclu MB, et al. Relationship between foot sensation and standing balance in patients with multiple sclerosis. Gait posture. 2011;34(2):275-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.015
  15. Telfer S, Abbott M, Steultjens M, et al. Dose-response effects of customised foot orthoses on lower limb muscle activity and plantar pressures in pronated foot type. Gait posture. 2013;38(3):443-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.012
  16. Choi HS, Lee JH. Immediate effect of balance taping using kinesiology tape on dynamic and static balance after ankle muscle fatigue. Healthcare. 2020;8(2):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020162
  17. Kuni B, Mussler J, Kalkum E, et al. Effect of kinesiotaping, non-elastic taping and bracing on segmental foot kinematics during drop landing in healthy subjects and subjects with chronic ankle instability. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(3):287-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.07.004
  18. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods. 2005;37(3):379-84. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192707
  19. Duckworth T, Betts RP, Franks CI, et al. The measurement of pressures under the foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1982;3(3):130-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078200300303
  20. Hartley EM, Hoch MC, Boling MC. Y-balance test performance and BMI are associated with ankle sprain injury in collegiate male athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(7):676-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.014
  21. Lopez-Plaza D, Juan-Recio C, Barbado D, et al. Reliability of the Star Excursion Balance Test and two new similar protocols to measure trunk postural control. PM R. 2018;10(12):1344-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.012
  22. Gunduz OH, Ozcan-Eksi EE, Giray E, et al. What impairs balance in ankylosing spondylitis? Posture or disease activity? Arch Rheumatol. 2017;32(3):221. https://doi.org/10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2017.6222
  23. Ghozy S, Dung NM, Morra ME, et al. Efficacy of kinesio taping in treatment of shoulder pain and disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:176-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.001
  24. Wilson V, Douris P, Fukuroku T, et al. The immediate and long-term effects of kinesiotape® on balance and functional performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(2):247.
  25. Tang M, Wang L, You Y, et al. Effects of taping techniques on arch deformation in adults with pes planus: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0253567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253567
  26. Koh HLA, Lin WH, Kong PW. Comfort and Ground Reaction Forces in Flat-Footed Female Runners: Comparison of Low-Dye Taping versus Sham Taping. J Sports Sci Med. 2020;19(3):620.
  27. Delahunt E, McGrath A, Doran N, et al. Effect of taping on actual and perceived dynamic postural stability in persons with chronic ankle instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1383-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.023
  28. Iris M, Monterde S, Salvador M, et al. Ankle taping can improve proprioception in healthy volunteers. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(12):1099-106. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2010.1099
  29. Best R, Mauch F, Bohle C, et al. Residual mechanical effectiveness of external ankle tape before and after competitive professional soccer performance. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(1):51-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e31829ddc74
  30. Kuni B, Mussler J, Kalkum E, et al. Effect of kinesiotaping, non-elastic taping and bracing on segmental foot kinematics during drop landing in healthy subjects and subjects with chronic ankle instability. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(3):287-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.07.004
  31. Chen TLW, Wong DWC, Peng Y, et al. Prediction on the plantar fascia strain offload upon Fascia taping and Low-Dye taping during running. J Orthop Transl. 2020;20:113-21.
  32. Struzik A, Stawarz M, Zawadzki J. The effect of low-Dye taping on hopping performance in handball players. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020;22(3):3-8.
  33. Kim EK, Kim JS. The effects of short foot exercises and arch support insoles on improvement in the medial longitudinal arch and dynamic balance of flexible flatfoot patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(11):3136-9. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3136
  34. Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(4):201-9. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2004.34.4.201