Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제22권2호
  • /
  • Pages.169-184
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis and fragility curves of tall steel buildings with buckling restrained braces and tuned mass dampers

  • Verki, Amir Masoumi (Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Preciado, Adolfo (Department of Habitat and Urban Development, Western Institute of Technology and Higher Education (ITESO))
  • 투고 : 2020.09.01
  • 심사 : 2022.01.11
  • 발행 : 2022.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The importance of seismicity in developing countries and the strengthening of buildings is a topic of major importance. Therefore, the study of several solutions with the development of new technologies is of great importance to investigate the damage on retrofitted structures by using probabilistic methods. The Federal Emergency Management Agency considers three types of performance levels by considering different scenarios, intensity and duration. The selection and scaling of ground motions mainly depends on the aim of the study. Intensity-based assessments are the most common and compute the response of buildings for a specified seismic intensity. Assessments based on scenarios estimate the response of buildings to different earthquake scenarios. A risk-based assessment is considered as one of the most effective. This research represents a practical method for developing countries where exists many active faults, tall buildings and lack of good implementable approaches. Therefore, to achieve the main goal, two high-rise steel buildings have been modeled and assessed. The contribution of buckling-restrained braces in the elastic design of both buildings is firstly verified. In the nonlinear static range, both buildings presented repairable damage at the central top part and some life safety hinges at the bottom. The nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis was applied by 15 representative/scaled accelerograms to obtain levels of performance and fragility curves. The results shown that by using probabilistic methods, it is possible to estimate the probability of collapse of retrofitted buildings by buckling-restrained braces and tuned mass dampers, which are practical retrofitting options to protect existing structures against earthquakes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdelraheem, A. (2012), "Optimum design of TMD system for tall buildings", Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 2(4), 511-532.
  2. Alizadeh, H.P. and Yaghoub, A.M. (2014), "A study of the seismic performance of concrete frames framed with a combination system of unrestrained and ordinary archers", Proc. 5th Nation. Conf. Earthq. Struct., JahadDaneshgahi, Kerman Province, May.
  3. Aval, S.B.B., Verki, A.M. and Rastegaran, M. (2014), "Systematical approach to evaluate collapse probability of steel MRF buildings based on engineering demand and intensity measure", Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Civil Struct. Mech. Eng., Bangkok, Thailand, January.
  4. Aval, S.B.B and Verki, A.M. (2019), "Seismic reliability assessment of a steel moment-resisting frame with two different ductility levels using a cloud analysis approach", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 18(1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0497-6.
  5. Bungale S.T. (1988), Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  6. Bilgin, H. and Huta, E. (2018), "Earthquake performance assessment of low and mid-rise buildings: Emphasis on URM buildings in Albania", Earthq. Struct., 14(6), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.599.
  7. Bouc, R. (1967), "Forced vibration of mechanical system with hysteresis", Proc. 4th Conf. Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia, September.
  8. Carpineto, N., Vestroni, F. and Lacarbonara, W. (2011), "Vibration mitigation by means of hysteretic tuned mass dampers", Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Struct. Dynam., Leuven, Belgium, July.
  9. Chen, Q., Wang, C.L., Meng, S. and Zeng, B. (2016), "Effect of the unbonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling-restrained braces". Eng. Struct., 111, 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.030.
  10. CSI (2010), Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS and SAFE, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
  11. Eletrabi, H. and Marshall, J. (2015), "Catenary action in steel framed buildings with buckling restrained braces", J. Constr. Steel Res., 113, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.026.
  12. FEMA-P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  13. FEMA-350 (2000), Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  14. FEMA-P58 (2012), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Methodology, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  15. Fereshtehnejad, S.E. (2011), "Simulation of different failure mechanisms in steel frames using system reliability reassessment", MSc Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  16. Frahm, H. (1909). "Device for damping vibrations of bodies", US Patent, 958-989.
  17. Giaralis, A. and Taflanidis, A.A. (2017), "Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria", Struct. Health. Monit., 25(2), e2082, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2082.
  18. Lin, G.L., Lin, C.C., Lu, L.Y. and Ho, Y.B. (2012), "Experimental verification of seismic vibration control using a semi-active friction tuned mass damper", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 41(4), 813-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1162.
  19. Guenidi, Z., Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Shrimalib, M.K. and Datta, T.K. (2017), "Control of adjacent buildings using shared tuned mass damper", Procedia Eng. 199, 1568-1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.059.
  20. Habibi, A.R. and Khaledy, N. (2015), "Evaluating rectangular loading pattern in nonlinear analysis of composite bridges under blast", J. Civil Eng., 26(2), 67-84. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=471355.
  21. Hall, J.R. (2011), "High-rise building fires", National Fire Protection Association, Fire Analysis and Research Division.
  22. Ierimonti, L., Venanzi, I. and Caracoglia, L. (2018), "Life-cycle damage-based cost analysis of tall buildings equipped with tuned mass dampers", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 176, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.03.009.
  23. IIEES (2003), "Major active faults of Iran", International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
  24. Jalayer, F. (2003), "Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: Implementing non-linear dynamic assessments", PhD Thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engr., Stanford University.
  25. Kiureghian, D. and Keshishian, P. (1996), "Effect of site response on spatial variability of ground motion", Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A.
  26. Kuckian, S., Parvez, M., Avinash, A.R. and Kamath, K. (2015), "Study on seismic response of retrofitted structures with fluid viscous dampers in shear walls", Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng., 8(2), 178-183. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338111676.
  27. Meinhardt, C. (2008), "Increase of a high rise buildings damping behavior by applying large scale tuned mass dampers", IABSE Congress Report, 17(28), 68-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/222137908796225591.
  28. Moridani, K.K. and Khodayari, R. (2013), "Seismic performance assessment uses incremental dynamic analysis", J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(8), 757-764. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325595236.
  29. Murudi, M.M. and Mane, S.M. (2004), "Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass damper for different ground motion parameters", Proc. 3th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August.
  30. Nateghi, F. and Tarbali, A.K. (2015), "The effect of tuned mass damper on seismic response of building frames with uncertain structural characteristics", Int. J. Eng. 28(5), 662-670. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2015.28.05b.03.
  31. Nejati, F., Masoumi, H. and Hooshmandi, A. (2012), "Comparison of hysterical behavior of BRB and EBF braces", Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Stab., Tabriz, Iran Seismic Stabilization Institute.
  32. Newmark, N. and Hall, W.J. (1969), "Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities", Proc. 4th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Santiago de Chile, Chile, January.
  33. Newmark, N. and Hall, W.J. (1982), "Earthquake spectra and design", EERI Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
  34. NFPA 101 (2021), National Fire Protection Association: life safety code. https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/all-codes-andstandards/list-of-codes-and-standards/detail?code=101.
  35. Ormondroyd, J. and Den Hartog, J.P. (1928), "The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber", Transactions ASME, 50(APM-50-7), 9-22.
  36. Owji, H.R., Shirazi, A.H.N. and Sarvestani, H.H. (2011), "A comparison between a new semi-actives tuned mass damper and an active tuned mass damper", Procedia Eng. 14, 2779-2787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.350.
  37. Pandikkadavath, M.S. and Sahoo, D.R. (2015), "Residual drift mitigation in concentrically braced frames using hybrid braces", Proc. 10th Pacific Conf. Earthq. Eng. Build. Earthq-Resilient Pacific, Sydney, Australia, November.
  38. Parulekar, Y.M. and Reddy, G.R. (2009), "Passive response control systems for seismic response reduction: A state of-the-art review", Int. J. Str. Stab. Dyn. 9(1), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455409002965.
  39. Pavel, F. and Lungu, D. (2012), "Frequency content indicators of strong ground motions", Proc. 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  40. Piedrafita, D., Cahis, X., Simon, E. and Comas, J. (2014), "A new perforated core buckling restrained brace", AMADE, Polytechnic School, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, Girona, Spain.
  41. Pinkaew, T., Lukkunaprasit, P. and Chatupote, P. (2003), "Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00115-3.
  42. Preciado, A., Bartoli, G. and Budelmann, H. (2015a), "Fundamental aspects on the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry towers and retrofitting techniques", Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 339-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.339.
  43. Preciado, A., Ramirez-Gaytan, A., Salido-Ruiz, R.A., Caro-Becerra, J.L. and Lujan-Godinez, R. (2015b), "Earthquake risk assessment methods of unreinforced masonry structures: Hazard and vulnerability", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 719-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.719.
  44. Preciado, A. (2019), "Proteccion sismica con disipadores viscosos y viscoelasticos de edificios aporticados de 15 niveles de concreto localizados en Guadalajara, Mexico", Postgraduate Thesis en Diseno y Rehabilitacion Sismo-resistentes de Edificios y Puentes, Universidad Politecnica de Cataluna, Barcelona, Espana.
  45. Preciado, A. and Sperbeck, S.T. (2019), "Failure analysis and performance of compact and slender carved stone walls under compression and seismic loading by the FEM approach", Eng. Fail. Anal., 96, 508-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.11.009.
  46. Preciado, A., Ramirez-Gaytan, A., Santos, J.C. and Rodriguez, O. (2020), "Seismic vulnerability assessment and reduction at a territorial scale on masonry and adobe housing by rapid vulnerability indicators: The case of Tlajomulco, Mexico", Int. J. Disast. Risk Res., 44, 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101425
  47. Razzaghi, S.A. and Hatami, H.R., (2019), "Evaluating the performance of the buckling restrained braces in tall buildings with peripherally braced frames", J. Rehabil. Civil Eng., 7(2), 21-39. https://dx.doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2018.12407.1213.
  48. RPSC (2019), "Experience of retrofitting damaged buildings in Kermanshah earthquake with buckling technology", Report of Pars Seismic Company, Tehran, Iran, January, in Persian. http://parsseismic.com/papers/experience-in-using-brb-forretrofitting-in-kermanshah.
  49. UBC (1997), Structural Engineering Design Provisions. Uniform Building Code (UBC), Whittier, California, U.S.A.
  50. Vaduva, M.G. Marin, L.M. and Cretu, D.I. (2012), "Improving the seismic response of tall reinforced concrete buildings using buckling restrained braces", 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  51. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
  52. Vega, J.A. and Hidalgo, C.A. (2016), "Quantitative risk assessment of landslides triggered by earthquakes and rainfall based on direct costs of urban buildings", Geomorphology, 273, 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.032.
  53. Verki, A.M. and Aval, S.B.B. (2020), "Performance-based design through implementation of FEMA P-58 methodology in developing countries", Open J. Earthq. Res., 9(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.93015
  54. Wang, J.F. (2005), "Seismic performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for soil-irregular building interaction system", Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(20), 5536-5554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.042.
  55. Wen, Y.K. (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech., 102(2), 249-263. https://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?dockey=0006630
  56. Wong, K.K.F. and Harris, J.L. (2010), "Seismic damage and fragility analysis of structures with tuned mass dampers based on plastic energy", Struct. Des. Tall Spec., 21(4), 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.604.
  57. Xu, Y.L., He, Q. and Ko, J.M. (2014), "Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation", The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  58. Zahrai, S.M. and Ghannadi-Asl, A. (2008), "Seismic performance of TMDs in improving the response of MRF buildings", Sci. Iran., 15(1), 21-33. http://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/?_action=xml&article=2979.
  59. Zahrai, S.M. and Earshad, L. (2003), "Project report on the vulnerability of Qazvin city buildings", Research Center Building and Housing.