DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation of Clinical Class with Duplex Ultrasound Findings in Lower Limb Chronic Venous Disease

  • Hong, Ki Pyo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.02.03
  • Accepted : 2022.04.10
  • Published : 2022.06.05

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the distribution of valve incompetence in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) and its correlation with the clinical category of the clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. Methods: In total, 1,386 limbs with clinically suspected CVD were categorized according to the CEAP classification and consecutively underwent duplex ultrasonography between April 2017 and December 2020. Results: There were 362 limbs in male patients and 1,024 limbs in female patients. The limbs were classified as C0s-C1 (608 limbs, 43.8%), C2 (727 limbs, 52.5%), or C3-C6 (51 limbs, 3.7%). The prevalence of saphenous vein incompetence in CEAP C0s-C1 limbs was 43.6%. The saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) was competent in 37% of CEAP C2-C6 limbs. The CEAP C3-C6 category was not correlated with reflux patterns of the saphenous vein system (Cramer's V=0.07), incompetent SFJ (Cramer's V=0.07), deep vein reflux (Cramer's V=0.03), or the distribution of incompetent segments in the great saphenous vein (GSV) (Cramer's V=0.11). Conclusion: Duplex ultrasonography is necessary to formulate a proper treatment plan for limbs categorized as CEAP C0s-C1. The SFJ was competent in more than one-third of CEAP C2-C6 limbs with GSV reflux; as such, flush ligation of the GSV may be unnecessary in these patients. The CEAP C3-C6 category showed no correlations with reflux patterns of the saphenous vein system, SFJ reflux, deep vein reflux, or the distribution of incompetent segments in the GSV.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (Grant no., NHIMC2020CR014). National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital had no involvement in study design, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.

References

  1. Pavlovic MD, Schuller-Petrovic S, Pichot O, et al. Guidelines of the First International Consensus Conference on Endovenous Thermal Ablation for Varicose Vein Disease: ETAV Consensus Meeting 2012. Phlebology 2015;30:257-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514524568
  2. Ludbrook J, Beale G. Femoral venous valves in relation to varicose veins. Lancet 1962;1:79-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)83664-9
  3. Abu-Own A, Scurr JH, Coleridge Smith PD. Saphenous vein reflux without incompetence at the saphenofemoral junction. Br J Surg 1994;81:1452-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800811016
  4. Labropoulos N, Giannoukas AD, Delis K, et al. Where does venous reflux start? J Vasc Surg 1997;26:736-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70084-3
  5. Cooper DG, Hillman-Cooper CS, Barker SG, Hollingsworth SJ. Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1782
  6. Engelhorn CA, Engelhorn AL, Cassou MF, Salles-Cunha SX. Patterns of saphenous reflux in women with primary varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:645-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.12.051
  7. Labropoulos N, Kang SS, Mansour MA, Giannoukas AD, Buckman J, Baker WH. Primary superficial vein reflux with competent saphenous trunk. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.1998.0794
  8. Qureshi MI, Gohel M, Wing L, et al. A study to evaluate patterns of superficial venous reflux in patients with primary chronic venous disease. Phlebology 2015;30:455-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514536384
  9. Labropoulos N, Leon L, Engelhorn CA, et al. Sapheno-femoral junction reflux in patients with a normal saphenous trunk. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:595-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.07.021
  10. Pittaluga P, Chastane S, Rea B, Barbe R. Classification of saphenous refluxes: implications for treatment. Phlebology 2008;23:2-9. https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2007.007042
  11. Garcia-Gimeno M, Rodriguez-Camarero S, Tagarro-Villalba S, et al. Reflux patterns and risk factors of primary varicose veins' clinical severity. Phlebology 2013;28:153-61.
  12. Chastanet S, Pittaluga P. Patterns of reflux in the great saphenous vein system. Phlebology 2013;28 Suppl 1:39-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355513477021
  13. Matic PA, Vlajinac HD, Marinkovic JM, Maksimovic MZ, Radak DJ. Chronic venous disease: correlation between ultrasound findings and the clinical, etiologic, anatomic and pathophysiologic classification. Phlebology 2014;29:522-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355513497360
  14. Zollmann P, Zollmann C, Zollmann P, et al. Determining the origin of superficial venous reflux in the groin with duplex ultrasound and implications for varicose vein surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017;5:82-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.10.001
  15. Panpikoon T, Wedsart B, Treesit T, Chansanti O, Bua-Ngam C. Duplex ultrasound findings and clinical classification of lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency in a Thai population. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019;7:349-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.012
  16. Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M, et al. The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020;8:342-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.075
  17. Cavezzi A, Labropoulos N, Partsch H, et al. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs: UIP consensus document: part II. anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:288-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.020
  18. Danielsson G, Eklof B, Grandinetti A, Kistner RL. The influence of obesity on chronic venous disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2002;36:271-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/153857440203600404
  19. Meulendijks AM, Franssen WM, Schoonhoven L, Neumann HA. A scoping review on chronic venous disease and the development of a venous leg ulcer: the role of obesity and mobility. J Tissue Viability 2020;29:190-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2019.10.002
  20. Evans CJ, Allan PL, Lee AJ, Bradbury AW, Ruckley CV, Fowkes FG. Prevalence of venous reflux in the general population on duplex scanning: the Edinburgh vein study. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:767-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70051-5
  21. Kostas TI, Ioannou CV, Drygiannakis I, et al. Chronic venous disease progression and modification of predisposing factors. J Vasc Surg 2010;51:900-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.119
  22. Pannier F, Rabe E. Progression in venous pathology. Phlebology 2015;30(1 Suppl):95-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514568847
  23. Pittaluga P, Chastanet S, Guex JJ. Great saphenous vein stripping with preservation of sapheno-femoral confluence: hemodynamic and clinical results. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1300-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.042
  24. Mariani F, Mancini S, Bucalossi M, Allegra C. Selective high ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction decreases the neovascularization and the recurrent varicose veins in the operated groin. Int Angiol 2015;34:250-6.
  25. Danielsson G, Eklof B, Grandinetti A, Lurie F, Kistner RL. Deep axial reflux, an important contributor to skin changes or ulcer in chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:1336-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00907-8
  26. Lin JC, Iafrati MD, O'Donnell TF Jr, Estes JM, Mackey WC. Correlation of duplex ultrasound scanning-derived valve closure time and clinical classification in patients with small saphenous vein reflux: is lesser saphenous vein truly lesser? J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1053-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.01.021