DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시 그린웨에이 대한 감지(感知)와 평가 연구 -정주시(郑州市) 동풍거(东风渠) 그린웨이를 중심으로-

A Study on Residents' Perception and Evaluation of Urban Greenway -Centered on the Greenway of Zhengzhou Dongfeng Canal-

  • 장림 (조선대학교 일반대학원 디자인학과) ;
  • 문정민 (조선대학교 일반대학원 디자인학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.20
  • 심사 : 2022.05.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.28

초록

그린웨이는 일종의 새로운 형태의 건강 공공 공간이다. 사용자들은 그린웨이에서 여가활동, 운동, 관람과 필요한 교통 이동을 한다. 그러나 현재까지는 그린웨이 사용자들이 그린웨이에 대한 평가 및 감지에 연관된 연구가 매우 부족하며, 인본적 관점에서 그린웨이 환경에 대한 종합적인 탐구가 아직 이루어지지 않고 있다.본 연구에서는 현재 중국도시의 대표적인 그린웨이에 대한 연구와 그린웨이의 실제 현황을 결합하고 대량의 문헌을 참고하였으며 시맨틱디퍼렌셜법(semantic differential method) 과 다원회귀분석 방법을 활용하여 동풍거(东风渠) 그린웨이를 분석하였다. 이를 통하여 그린웨이 사용자들의 감지(感知)의 관점에서 출발하여 그린웨이 환경에 미치는 영향 요소 및 그에 따른 영향평가를 탐구하고 여러 가지 측면에서 정주시(郑州市) 동풍거(东风渠) 환경의 최적화에 대한 개선 사항을 건의하였다. 본 연구의 가장 핵심적인 결론은 시맨틱디퍼렌셜법(semantic differential method)에서 도출된 데이터 결과가 그린웨이를 사용하는 주민들의 평가로부터 실질적으로 실현 가능한 데에서 기인한 것이며, 사용 후 평가된 피드백 결과는 앞으로 이와 같은 그린웨이 계획 설계에 신뢰할 수 있는 참고적 자료를 제공해줄 수 있다.

As a new type of healthy public space, greenway users carry out leisure activities, exercise, sightseeing and necessary transportation in greenway. However, at present, there is little research on greenway users' evaluation and perception of greenway, and there is no comprehensive exploration of Greenway environment from a humanistic perspective. Combined with the research and actual situation of the existing representative greenways in Chinese cities, this paper refers to a large number of documents, applies the semantic difference method and multiple regression analysis method, analyzes the current situation of the Dongfengqu greenway, explores the influencing factors and impact evaluation of the greenway environment from the perspective of greenway users' perception, and puts forward suggestions on the optimization of the greenway environment in Zhengzhou from multiple levels. The main conclusion of this paper comes from the data conclusion obtained by semantic difference method, which is feasible in the resident evaluation of greenway use. The feedback results of post use evaluation can provide a reliable reference for the planning and design of similar greenways in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nan NAN. Current problems and Countermeasures of ecological green space in urban and rural planning System [J]. Chinese Garden, 2015 (8):90-93.
  2. PALARDYNP, BOLEYBB, GAITHERCJ. Resident Support for Urban Green ways Across Diverse Neighborhoods: Comparing Two Atlanta Belt line Segments[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 180: 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.021
  3. Frink, Sheens. Greenway Planning, Design and Development [M]. Yu Qing, Liu Xiaoxia, Chen Linlin, trans. Beijing: China Architecture and Architecture Press, 2009.
  4. Little, American Greenway [M]. Yu Qing, Mo Wenjing, Chen Haimu, trans. Beijing: China Architecture and Architecture Press, 2013.
  5. Hu Jianshuang, He Hui, Fan Fenghua, et al. Overview of Greenway Research in China in Recent Four Years [C].Urban Planning Society of China. Urban and Rural Governance and Planning Reform -- 2014 China Urban Planning Annual Conference Proceedings. Beijing: China Architecture and Architecture Press, 2014:325-337.
  6. OSGOOD.C.E, SUCI.G.J, TANNENBAUM.P. The Measurement of Meaning[M].Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
  7. CERVERO.R, KOCKELMAN.K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment, 1997, 2(3): 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
  8. Zhu Wei, simple, Zhang Qiaoyang. Integrated Transportation Accessibility: Index Construction and Application in Shanghai Park [J]. Planners, 2018 (2) : 108-113.]
  9. Zhu Wei,Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Road Cycling Environment based on VISUAL SP Method -- Model Construction and Application in Shanghai Central City [J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2016 (3) : 85-92.
  10. Li Xin-jue, Chen Nan, Chen Keshi. Research on the Construction practice of Sports leisure Greenway with Urban Interaction -- A Case study of The Riverside Greenway around Taipei [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2015 (11) : 34-40.
  11. LUSK A C, SILVA FILHO D F, DOBBERT L, et al.Pedestrian and Cyclist Preferences for Tree Locations by Sidewalks and Cycle Tracks and Associated Benefits:Worldwide Implications from a Study in Boston, MA[J]. Cities, 2018: 1-9.
  12. CAUWENBERG.J.V, CLARYS.P, BOURDEAUDHUIJ.I.D, et al. Environmental Influences on Older Adults' Transportation Cycling Experiences: A Study Using Bike-along Interviews[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 169: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.003
  13. GEHL.J, GEMZOE.L. Public Space Public Life[M]. Copenhagen: The Danish Architectural Press, 2004.
  14. Tan Xiaotian. Sociological Research Methods [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2009.
  15. https://www.csdn.net/tags/MtTaMg1sNTY2ODMxLWJsb2cO0O0O.html. KMO and Bartlett sphericity test of two kinds of methods.
  16. Zheng Lu Lu. Post-evaluation of Architectural Planning Based on SD Method [D]. Tianjin University, 2008.