디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권5호
  • /
  • Pages.291-295
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상사유머가 부하의 직무만족에 미치는 영향: LMX와 CWX의 매개효과 검증

The effect of supervisor humor on subordinates' job satisfaction: Mediating effects of LMX and CWX

  • 투고 : 2022.04.25
  • 심사 : 2022.05.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 상사유머가 LMX 및 CWX에 미치는 영향, LMX 및 CWX가 부하의 직무만족에 미치는 영향, 상사유머와 부하의 직무만족 간의 관계에서 LMX 및 CWX의 매개효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 가설 검증을 위해 지방 소재기업 내 종업원 230명의 자료를 분석에 활용하였다. 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 상사유머는 LMX 및 CWX에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, LMX와 CWX는 부하의 직무만족에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, LMX 및 CWX는 상사유머와 부하의 직무만족 간의 관계를 부분 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 연구의 시사점 및 한계점 그리고 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of supervisor humor on LMX and CWX. LMX and CWX on subordinates' job satisfaction. Additionally, we attempt to test the mediating roles of LMX and CWX on the relationships between supervisor humor and subordinates' job satisfaction. To verify the proposed hypotheses, we collected 230 data of employees in various industry. The major findings are as follows: 1) supervisor humor is positively associated with LMX and CWX. 2) LMX and CWX are positively associated with subordinates' job satisfaction. 3) LMX and CWX partially mediate the relationship between supervisor humor and subordinates' job satisfaction. We provided implications of the research results and recommendations for future research.

키워드

과제정보

This paper was supported by Honam University Research Grant in 2021

참고문헌

  1. C. D. Cooper & J. J. Sosik. (2012). The laughter advantage: Cultivating high quality connections and workplace outcomes through humor. In G. M. Spreitzer & K. Cameron (Eds.), The handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 474-489. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  2. C. D. Cooper, D. T. Kong & C. D. Crossley. (2018). Leader humor as an interpersonal resource: Intergrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management, 61(2), 769-796. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0358
  3. C. D. Cooper. (2005). Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior? Academy of Management Review, 30, 765-776. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.18378877
  4. P. Alexander & F. Herrmann. (2015). Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader-member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12081
  5. R. A. Martin. (2007). The psychology of humor. An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
  6. S. D. Fitts, R. A. Sebby & M. S. Zlokovich. (2009). Humor styles as mediators of the shyness- loneliness relationship. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 257-272.
  7. N. A. Kuiper & C. Leite. (2010). Personality impressions associated with four distinct humor styles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00734.x
  8. D. M. Sluss & B. E. Ashforth. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672
  9. J. G. Rosse & A. I. Kraut. (1983). Reconsidering the vertical dyadic linkage model of leadership. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1983.tb00111.x
  10. K. M. Sherony & S. G. Green. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of applied psychology, 87(3), 542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
  11. B. J. Avolio, J. M. Howell & J. J. Sosik. (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator leadership style effects. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/257094
  12. R. C. Liden & J. M. Maslyn. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
  13. K. M. Sherony & S. G. Green. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 542-548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
  14. C. C. Manz. (1992). Gorbachev: An anatomy of leadership, superleadership, or nonleadership. Human Resource Development, 3, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920030210
  15. K. J. Preacher & A. F. Hayes. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553