DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Dental Plaque Removal Effect by Floss Type Using QLF-D

  • Myoung-Hee Kim (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Yu Jin Park (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Young Sun Hwang (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University)
  • Received : 2022.10.25
  • Accepted : 2022.11.22
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

Background: The use of dental floss is associated with a reduction in dental caries and periodontal disease. According to personal preference, not only thread type but also C type and Y type floss are used. Although the effectiveness of dental floss for removing dental plaque has been proven, plaque removal effect of C type and Y type floss has not been well reported. In this study, the plaque removal effect of C type and Y type floss compared to thread type floss was experimentally verified. Methods: Thread type, C type and Y type floss were used to remove dental plaque. Ten people in each flossing group participated, and by applying dental floss to the 6 incisors of the maxilla and mandible, the degree of dental plaque was analyzed by QLF-D. To evaluate the removal degree of dental plaque before and after flossing, Simple Plaque Score (SPS), Area R30, Area R70, and Area R120 score were measured. Results: In the analysis using the Area R30 fluorescence score of the QLF-D system, the degree of plaque removal according to the application of dental floss was effective in all the thread type (p=0.018), C-type (p=0.012), and Y-type (p=0.012) floss groups compared to before the application of the floss. Among them, C type floss was more effective in removing plaque than thread type and Y type floss. However, the plaque removal effect between the three floss types was not significantly different in ∆SPS (p=0.674), ∆Area R30 (p=0.726), ∆Area R70 (p=0.504), and ∆Area R120 scores (p=0.423). Conclusion: Thread type, C type, and Y type floss were all effective in removing dental plaque, but there was no significant difference in dental plaque removal effect according to the type of floss.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2022R1F1A1063204).

References

  1. Healthcare Bigdata Hub: 2021 High frequency disease statistics. Retrieved August 24, 2022, from http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olapHifrqSickInfo.do. 
  2. Nyvad B, Takahashi N: Integrated hypothesis of dental caries and periodontal diseases. J Oral Microbiol 12: 1710953, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1710953 
  3. Sambunjak D, Nickerson JW, Poklepovic T, et al.: Flossing for the management of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12): CD008829, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008829.pub2 
  4. Fleisher KE, Kuriakose MA, DeLacure EK, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Where are we now? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55: 757-762, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.07.007 
  5. Zimmer S, Kolbe C, Kaiser G, Krage T, Ommerborn M, Barthel C: Clinical efficacy of flossing versus use of antimicrobial rinses. J Periodontol 77: 1380-1385, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050362 
  6. Arora V, Tangade P, Ravishankar TL, Tirth A, Pal S, Tandon V: Efficacy of dental floss and chlorhexidine mouth rinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing in removing plaque and gingival inflammation- a three way cross over trial. J Clin Diagn Res 8: ZC01-ZC04, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8807.4943 
  7. Kiger RD, Nylund K, Feller RP: A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes. J Clin Periodontol 18: 681-684, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00109.x 
  8. Kim KH, Ha MO, Hong NH, Cho MJ: Effect of fluoride application after dental prophylaxis by the type of dental floss. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 16: 77-83, 2016. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2016.16.01.77 
  9. Ruby JD, Cox CF, Akimoto N, Meada N, Momoi Y: The caries phenomenon: a timeline from witchcraft and superstition to opinions of the 1500s to today's science. Int J Dent 2010: 432767, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/432767 
  10. Eidenhardt Z, Ritsert A, Shankar-Subramanian S, Ebel S, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Deinzer R: Tooth brushing performance in adolescents as compared to the best-practice demonstrated in group prophylaxis programs: an observational study. BMC Oral Health 21: 359, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01692-z 
  11. Health Policy Institute: 2016 Year book of the Korean Dentistry. Retrieved Aug 19, 2022, from http://www.pikda.or.kr/bbs/bbs_view.asp?id=86&menuId=pub&pageId=yearly&search=f1&searchstr=&books_name=&books_org=. 
  12. Jeung MO, Kang PS, Lee KS, Hwang TY: Usage patterns of oral care products of dental patients. Yeungnam Univ J Med 24(2 Suppl): S319-S329, 2007. https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2007.24.2S.S319 
  13. So MH, Kim SS, Shin SB: A study on usage status of oral hygiene devices in some area. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 10: 1107-1119, 2010. 
  14. Yan YJ, Wang BW, Yang CM, Wu CY, Ou-Yang M: Autofluorescence detection method for dental plaque bacteria detection and classification: example of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Streptococcus mutans. Dent J (Basel) 9: 74, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9070074 
  15. Choi MS, Kim DK: Reviews of literature on dental plaque control and oral hygiene education in Korea. J Dent Hyg Sci 17: 87-98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2017.17.2.87 
  16. Klaus K, Glanz T, Glanz AG, Ganss C, Ruf S: Comparison of Quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) images and images of disclosed plaque for planimetric quantification of dental plaque in multibracket appliance patients. Sci Rep 10: 4478, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61454-9