DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical investigations on the effect of mean incident wind on flutter onset of bridge deck sections

  • Keerthana, M. (Wind Engineering Laboratory, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, CSIR Campus) ;
  • Harikrishna, P. (Wind Engineering Laboratory, CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, CSIR Campus)
  • Received : 2021.02.19
  • Accepted : 2022.02.18
  • Published : 2022.05.25

Abstract

The effect of mean angle of wind attack on the flutter critical wind speed of two generic bridge deck cross-sections, viz, one closed box type streamlined section (deck-1) and closed box trapezoidal bluff type section with extended flanges/overhangs (deck-2) type of section have been studied using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based forced vibration simulation method. Owing to the importance of the effect of the amplitude of forcing oscillation on the flutter onset, its effect on the flutter derivatives and flutter onset have been studied, especially at non-zero mean angles of wind attack. The flutter derivatives obtained have been used to evaluate flutter critical wind speeds and flutter index of the deck sections at non-zero mean angles of wind attack studied and the same have been validated with those based on experimental results reported in literature. The value of amplitude of forcing oscillation in torsional degree of freedom for CFD based simulations is suggested to be in the range of 0.5° to 2°, especially for bluff bridge deck sections. Early onset of flutter from numerical simulations, thereby conservative estimate of occurrence of instability has been observed from numerical simulations in case of bluff bridge deck section. The study aids in gaining confidence and the extent of applicability of CFD during early stages of bridge design, especially towards carrying out studies on mean incident wind effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Bai, Y., Sun, D. and Lin, J. (2010), "Three dimensional numerical simulations of long-span bridge aerodynamics, using block-iterative coupling and DES", Comput. Fluid., 39, 1549-1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.05.005.
  2. Bai, Y., Sun, D., Lin, J., Kennedy, D. and Williams, F. (2012), "Numerical aerodynamic simulations of a NACA airfoil using CFD with block-iterative coupling and turbulence modelling", Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 26(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2011.646997.
  3. Blevins, R.D. (2001), Flow-Induced Vibration, Second Edition, Krieger Publising Company, Florida.
  4. Brusiani, F., De Miranda, S., Patruno, L., Ubertini, F. and Vaona, P. (2013), "On the evaluation of bridge deck flutter derivatives using RANS turbulence models", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 119, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.05.002.
  5. Casalotti, A., Arena, A. and Lacarbonara, W. (2014), "Mitigation of post-flutter oscillations in suspension bridges by hysteretic tuned mass dampers", Eng. Struct., 69, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.001.
  6. Chen, X. and Kareem, A. (2001), "Nonlinear response analysis of long-span bridges under turbulent winds", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 89, 1335-1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00147-7.
  7. Chen, X. and Kareem, A. (2006), "Revisiting multimode coupled bridge flutter: Some new insights", J. Eng Mech., 132(10), 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132.
  8. Chen, Z.Q., Yu, X.D., Yang, G. and Spencer, B.F. (2005), "Wind-induced self-excited loads on bridges", J. Struct. Eng., 131(12), 1783-1793. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1783).
  9. Chen, Z.S., Zhang, C., Wang, X. and Ma, C.M. (2017), "Wind tunnel measurements for flutter of a long-afterbody bridge deck", Sensor., 17(2), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020335.
  10. Dyrbye, C. and Hjorth-Hansen, E. (1997), Wind Loads on Structures, 1st Edition, Wiley, New York.
  11. Fluent Inc. (2006), FLUENT User's Guide, September.
  12. Fung, Y. (1993), An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity, Dover Publication, New York.
  13. Ge, Y. (2016), "Aerodynamic challenge and limitation in long-span cable-supported bridges", The 2016 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental and Materials Research, Keynote Lecture.
  14. Glumac, A.S., Hoffer, R. and Brcic, S. (2017), "Identification of flutter derivatives by forced vibration tests", J. Croatian Assoc. Civil Eng., 69(4), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.1504.2015.
  15. Hassan, M., Gerber, A. and Omar, H. (2010), "Numerical estimation of fluidelastic instability in tube arrays", J. Press. Ves. Technol., 132, 041307-11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002112.
  16. Hirsch, C., Tartinville, B., Roosevelt, F. and Navier-stokes, B.R. (2009), "Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes modelling for industrial applications and some challenging issues", Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 23(4), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902773379.
  17. Huang, L., Liao, H., Wang, B. and Li, Y. (2009), "Numerical simulation for aerodynamic derivatives of bridge deck", Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 17, 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2008.12.004.
  18. Jones, R., T. (1940), "The unsteady lift of a wing of finite aspect ratio", Nasa Report. https://doi.org/.1037//0033-2909.I26.1.78.
  19. Jurado, J.A., Hernandez, S., Nieto, F. and Mosquera, A. (2011), Bridge Aeroelasticity. Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design, WIT Press, Southampton, Boston.
  20. Kavrakov, I. and Morgenthal, G. (2018), "A synergistic study of a CFD and semi-analytical models for aeroelastic analysis of bridges in turbulent wind conditions", J. Fluid. Struct., 82, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.013.
  21. Keerthana, M. (2019), "Experimental and numerical investigations on wind induced instabilities of bridge deck sections", Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research.
  22. Keerthana, M. and Harikrishna, P. (2013), "Application of CFD for assessment of galloping stability of rectangular and H-sections", J. Scientif. Indus. Res., 72(7), 419-427.
  23. Keerthana, M. and Harikrishna, P. (2017), "Wind tunnel investigations on aerodynamics of a 2:1 rectangular section for various angles of wind incidence", Wind Struct., 25(3), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.25.3.301.
  24. Kimura, I. and Hosoda, T. (2003), "A non-linear k-ε model with realizability for prediction of flows around bluff bodies", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid., 42, 813-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.540.
  25. Larsen, A. (1993), "Aerodynamics aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the great belt", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 48(2-3), 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A.
  26. Larsen, A. and Walther, J.H. (1998), "Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic bridge deck sections", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 77-78, 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00175-5.
  27. Le Maitre, O.P., Scanlan, R.H. and Knio, O.M. (2003), "Estimation of the flutter derivatives of an NACA airfoil by means of Navier-Stokes simulation", J. Fluid. Struct., 17, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(02)00111-1.
  28. Liu, S., Zhao, L., Fang, G., Hu, C. and Ge, Y. (2022), "Nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics and modeling of a quasi-flat plate at torsional vibration: effects of angle of attack and vibration amplitude", Nonlin. Dyn., 107, 2027-2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-021-07082-y.
  29. Ma, T.T., Zhao, L., Shen, X.M. and Ge, Y.J. (2021), "Case study of three-dimensional aeroelastic effect on critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 212, 104614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104614.
  30. Mannini, C. (2006), "Flutter vulnerability assessment of flexible bridges", Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florence, Italy.
  31. Mannini, C. (2015), "Applicability of URANS and DES simulations of flow past rectangular cylinders and bridge sections", Comput., 3, 479-508. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation3030479.
  32. Mannini, C. and Bartoli, G. (2008), "Investigation on the dependence of bridge deck flutter derivatives on steady angle of attack", Proceedings of the BBAAVI Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications, Milano, Italy.
  33. Mannini, C., Sbragi, G. and Schewe, G. (2016), "Analysis of self-excited forces for a box-girder bridge deck through unsteady RANS simulations", J. Fluid. Struct., 63, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.02.007.
  34. Menter, F.R. (2009), "Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective", Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 23(4), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618560902773387.
  35. Menter, F.R. (2011), "Turbulence modeling for engineering flows", A Technical Paper from ANSYS, Inc, 1-25.
  36. Muddada, S. and Patnaik, B.S.V. (2010), "An assessment of turbulence models for the prediction of flow past a circular cylinder with momentum injection", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 98, 575-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.05.001.
  37. Noda, H. and Nakayama, A. (2003), "Reproducibility of flow past two-dimensional rectangular cylinders in a homogeneous turbulent flow by LES", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 91, 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00350-1.
  38. Patruno, L. (2015), "Accuracy of numerically evaluated flutter derivatives of bridge deck sections using RANS: Effects on the flutter onset velocity", Eng. Struct., 89, 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.034.
  39. Russell, D.M. (1997), "Error measures for comparing transient data: part II: error measures case study", 68th Shock and Vibration Symposium, 175-198.
  40. Sarkic, A., Fisch, R., Hoffer, R. and Bletzinger, K.U. (2012), "Bridge flutter derivatives based on computed, validated pressure fields", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 104-106, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.02.033.
  41. Scanlan, R.H. (1997), "Some observations on the state of bluff-body aeroelasticity", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 69-71, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00148-7.
  42. Scanlan, R.H. and Tomko, J.J. (1971), "Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives", J. Eng. Mech., 97(6), 1717-1737. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526.
  43. Schlichting, H. (1979), Bounday Layer Theory, Seventh Edition, McGraw Hill.
  44. Tang, H., Li, Y., Chen, X., Shum, K.M. and Liao, H. (2017), "Flutter performance of central-slotted plate at large angles of attack", Wind Struct., 24(5), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.24.5.447.
  45. Tao, T., Wang, H. and Wu, T. (2018), "Parametric study on buffeting performance of a long-span triple-tower suspension bridge", Struct. Infrastr. Eng., 14(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1354034.
  46. Tao, T., Wang, H. and Gao, Y. (2020), "Parametric analysis on flutter performance of a long-span quadruple-tower suspension bridge", Struct., 28, 1108-1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.058.
  47. Vairo, G. (2003), "A numerical model for wind loads simulation on long-span bridges", Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 11, 315-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-190X(03)00053-4.
  48. Wu, B., Wang, Q., Liao, H., Li, Y. and Li, M. (2020), "Flutter derivatives of a flat plate section and analysis of flutter instability at various wind angles of attack", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 196, 104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104046.
  49. Xu, F. and Zhang, Z. (2017), "Free vibration numerical simulation technique for extracting flutter derivatives of bridge decks", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 170, 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.018.
  50. Xu, F.Y., Ying, X.Y. and Zhang, Z. (2014), "Three-degree-of-freedom coupled numerical technique for extracting 18 aerodynamic derivatives of bridge decks", J. Struct. Eng., 140(11), 04014085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001009.
  51. Yamada, H. and Miyata, T. (1988), "Motion of the separation bubble and heaving responses of vortex induced oscillation of bridge decks", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 29, 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90174-2.
  52. Yang, Y., Zhou, R., Ge, Y., Mohotti, D. and Mendis, P. (2015), "Aerodynamic instability performance of twin box girders for long-span bridges", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 145, 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.014.
  53. Ying, X., Xu, F., Zhang, M. and Zhang, Z. (2017), "Numerical explorations of the limit cycle flutter characteristics of a bridge deck", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 169, 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.020.