DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO CHOICE IN A BINOMIAL-TREE AND ITS CONVERGENCE

  • Jeong, Seungwon (Department of Financial Engineering, School of Business, Ajou University) ;
  • Ahn, Sang Jin (Department of Financial Engineering, School of Business, Ajou University) ;
  • Koo, Hyeng Keun (Department of Financial Engineering, School of Business, Ajou University) ;
  • Ahn, Seryoong (Division of Business Administration, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2022.01.03
  • Accepted : 2022.03.08
  • Published : 2022.05.18

Abstract

This study investigates the convergence of the optimal consumption and investment policies in a binomial-tree model to those in the continuous-time model of Merton (1969). We provide the convergence in explicit form and show that the convergence rate is of order ∆t, which is the length of time between consecutive time points. We also show by numerical solutions with realistic parameter values that the optimal policies in the binomial-tree model do not differ significantly from those in the continuous-time model for long-term portfolio management with a horizon over 30 years if rebalancing is done every 6 months.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2021S1A5A2A03063960).

References

  1. Ahn, S., Choi, K. J., and Koo, H. K., A simple asset pricing model with heterogeneous agents, uninsurable labor income and limited stock market participation, uninsurable labor income and limited stock market participation, Journal of Banking & Finance 55 (2015), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.019
  2. Ahn, S. and Koo, H. K., Optimal consumption and slutsky equation with epstein-zin type preference, Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 16 (2012), no.2, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.12941/jksiam.2012.16.2.107
  3. Amin. K. and Khanna, A., Convergence of american option values from discrete-to continuous-time financial models 1, Mathematical Finance 4 (1994), no.4, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.1994.tb00059.x
  4. Balzer, T., Portfolio management in the binomial model: conditions for outperforming benchmarks, OR Spectrum 25 (2003), no.1, 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-002-0110-6
  5. Bauerle, N. and Mundt, A., Dynamic mean-risk optimization in a binomial model, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 70 (2009), no.2, 219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0267-0
  6. Bayer, C. and Veliyev, B., Utility maximization in a binomial model with transaction costs: a duality approach based on the shadow price process, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 17 (2014), no.4, 1450022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024914500228
  7. Bayraktar, E., Dolinsky, Y., and Guo, J., Continuity of utility maximization under weak convergence, Mathematics and Financial Economics 14 (2020), no.4, 725-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-020-00274-x
  8. Black, F. and Scholes, M., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, The Journal of Political Economy 81 (1973), no.3, 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062
  9. Boyle, P. P. and Vorst, T., Option replication in discrete time with transaction costs, The Journal of Finance 47 (1992), no.1, 271-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03986.x
  10. Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., and Rubinstein, M., Option pricing: A simplified approach, Journal of financial Economics 7 (1979), no.3, 229-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
  11. Dybvig, P. and Koo, H. K., Investment with taxes, Washington University 126 (1996), 620-635.
  12. Epstein, L. G. and Zin, S. E., Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis, Journal of political Economy 99 (1991), no.2, 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1086/261750
  13. He, H., Convergence from discrete-to continuous-time contingent claims prices, The review of financial studies 3 (1990), no.4, 523-546. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/3.4.523
  14. He, H., Optimal consumption-portfolio policies: a convergence from discrete to continuous time models, Journal of Economic Theory 55 (1991), no.2, 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(91)90044-5
  15. Hull, J. C. and Basu, S., Options, future & other derivatives, Pearson Education (2018).
  16. Jang, B. G., Koo, H. K., and Rhee, Y., Asset demands and consumption with longevity risk, Economic Theory 62 (2016), no.3, 587-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-015-0922-7
  17. Jiang, L. and Dai, M., Convergence of binomial tree method for american options, Partial Differential Equations and their Applications (1999), 106-118.
  18. Jiang, L. and Dai, M., Convergence of binomial tree methods for european/american path-dependent options, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 42 (2004), no.3, 1094-1109. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142902414220
  19. Jorda, O., Knoll, K., Kuvshinov, D., Schularick, M., and Taylor, A. M., The rate of return on everything, 1870-2015, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134 (2019), no.3, 1225-1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz012
  20. Kwon, M. J. and Kim, K. I., Convergence of the binomial tree method for pricing lookback options in a jump-diffusion model, 한국산업응용수학회 학술대회 논문집 2 (2007), no.1, 27-31.
  21. Merton, R. C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case, The review of Economics and Statistics (1969), 247-257.
  22. Omberg, E., A note on the convergence of binomial-pricing and compound-option models, The Journal of Finance 42 (1987), no.2, 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb02578.x
  23. Qian, X. S., Xu, C. L., Jiang, L. S., and Bian, B. J., Convergence of the binomial tree method for american options in a jump-diffusion model, SIAM journal on numerical analysis 42 (2005), no.5, 1899-1913. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142902409744
  24. Rizal, N. A., Surya, B. A., and Wiryono, S. K., Optimal portfolio in discrete-time under hara utility function, In 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies, IEEE (2014), 421-424.