DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of an oyster monthly forecasting model using the structural equation model approach based on a panel analysis

  • Sukho Han (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Seonghwan Song (Korea Rural Economic Institute) ;
  • Sujin Heo (Fisheries Policy Implementation Division, Korea Maritime Institute) ;
  • Namsu Lee (Fisheries Policy Implementation Division, Korea Maritime Institute)
  • Received : 2022.10.25
  • Accepted : 2022.11.21
  • Published : 2022.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to build an oyster outlook model. In particular, by limiting oyster items, it was designed as a partial equilibrium model based on a panel analysis of a fixed effect model on aquaculture facilities. The model was built with a dynamic ecological equation (DEEM) system that considers aquaculture and harvesting processes. As a result of the estimation of the initial aquaculture facilities based on the panel analysis, the elasticity of the remaining facility volume in the previous month was estimated to be 0.63. According to Nerlove's model, the adjustment coefficient was interpreted as 0.31 and the adjustment speed was analyzed to be very slow. Also, the relative income coefficient was estimated to be 2.41. In terms of elasticity, it was estimated as 0.08% in Gyeongnam, 0.32% in Jeonnam, and 1.98% in other regions. It was analyzed that the elasticity of relative income was accordingly higher in non-main production area. In case of the estimation of the monthly harvest facility volume, the elasticity of the remaining facility volume in the previous month was estimated as 0.53, and the elasticity of the farm-gate price was estimated as 0.23. Both fresh and chilled and frozen oysters' exports were estimated to be sensitive to fluctuations in domestic prices and exchange rates, while Japanese wholesale prices were estimated to be relatively low in sensitivity, especially to the exchange rate with Japan. In estimating the farm-gate price, the price elasticity coefficient of monthly production was estimated to be inelastic at 0.25.

Keywords

References

  1. AhlburgD. 1984. Forecast evaluation and improvement using Theil's decomposition. Journal of Forecasting 3:345-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980030313
  2. Cagon P. 1956. The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation. In Studies in the quantity theory of money edited by Friedman M. pp. 25-117. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
  3. Cho JH. 2016. Maintenance of the supply and demand forecast model for each major seafood item in 2016. Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Korea.[in Korean]
  4. Han SH, Heo SJ, Lee NS. 2021. A study of a flatfish outlook model using a partial equilibrium model approach based on aDEEM system. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:815-829.[in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20210069
  5. Han SH, Jang HS. 2019. Maintenance of the supply and demand forecast model for each major seafood item in 2018. Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Korea.[in Korean]
  6. Han SH, Jang HS. 2020. Maintenance of the supply and demand forecast model for each major seafood item in 2019. Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Korea.[in Korean]
  7. Han SH, Seo HS, Youm JW, Kim CH. 2016. A study on development of Korea agricultural simulation model 2015. M137. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea.[in Korean]
  8. Kim BS. 2014. Maintenance of the supply and demand forecast model for each major seafood item in 2014. Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Korea.[in Korean]
  9. KMI (Korea Maritime Institute). 2021. Oyster monthly outlook report. Korea Maritime Institute, Busan, Korea. [in Korean]
  10. Nerlove M. 1956. Estimates ofthe elasticities of supply selected agricultural commodities. Journal of Farm Economics 38:496-506.