한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.134-144
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Intention to Adopt Autonomous Ships Using the TOE Framework and DOI Theory

  • Park, You-Jin (Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeong, Yu-Jin (Department of Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • An, Young-Su (Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jong-Kap (Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.07
  • 심사 : 2022.04.29
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The development and operation of autonomous ships are spotlighted as a next-generation technology that will provide newbenefits for the maritime business during the fourth industrial revolution. To expand the adoption of autonomous ships, the much more interest of the nation and the industries will have to be changed to actual adoption in shipping companies. For this, it is judged that research to identify the factors impacting the adoption intention of autonomous ships should be preceded. However, most studies on autonomous ships have focused on developing the technology, revising the law, establishing policies, and managing human resources, with few studies on influencing factors in the adoption of autonomous ships. A model, to identify the factors that impact the intention to the adoption of autonomous ships, based on the theory of diffusion of innovation and the TOE framework was developed. The suggested model was verified through empirical analysis targeting the shipping companies and the marine industries in Korea. As the result of this study, it was found that top management support, financial slack, and competitive intensity significantly impacted the intention to adopt autonomous ships. Additionally, it was revealed that the overall awareness of autonomous ships among Korean shipping companies is poor.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5B5A07107371)

참고문헌

  1. Acute Market Reports, "Autonomous Ships Market Growth, Future Prospects & Competitive Analysis, 2017-2025", 2017.
  2. Ahvenjarvi, S.(2016), "The human element and autonomous ships", TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 517-521. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.10.03.18
  3. Chen, Z. et al.(2020), "Deep learning for autonomous ship-oriented small ship detection", Safety Science. Vol. 130, pp. 812-823.
  4. Chin, W. W.(1998), "Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling", Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 7-16.
  5. Choi, J. H. et al.(2018), "Roles and Legal Status of the Remote Operator in a Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship: Focusing on the Concept of a Crew and a Master", Maritime Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 155-185. https://doi.org/10.14443/kimlaw.2018.30.2.6
  6. Cohen J.(1988), "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences", 2nd ed, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Egloff, C. et al.(2018), "The Digital Imperative in Container Shipping", The Boston Consulitng Group, pp. 4-5.
  8. Ettlie, J. E.(1986), "Implementing manufacturing technologies: lessons from experience", In Managing technological innovation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 72-104.
  9. Fonseca, T. et al.(2021), "Assessing innovation in transport: an application of the Technology Adoption (TechAdo) model to Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", Transport Policy, Vol. 114, pp. 182-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.09.005
  10. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W.(2000), "The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: Astudy of e-commerce adoption", Journal of the association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008
  11. Grover, V.(1993), "An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems", Decision sciences, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 603-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x
  12. Hair, J. F. et al.(2014), "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research", European Business Review, Vol, 26, No. 2, pp. 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  13. Hair, J. F. et al.(2017), "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
  14. Hair, J. F. et al.(2019), "When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM", European Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
  15. Hsu, P. F. et al.(2006), "Determinants of e-business use in us firms," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 9-45. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100401
  16. IMO(2018), MSC 99/WP.9, "Framework for the Regulatory Scoping Exercise".
  17. Im I. et al.(2018), "Components for smart autonomous ship architecture based on intelligent information technology", Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 134, pp. 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.148
  18. Jung, H. R. et al.(2019), "Trend of Autonomous Navigation Technology for Unmanned Ship", Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and System, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 76-87. https://doi.org/10.5302/j.icros.2019.18.0133
  19. Karlis, T.(2018), "Maritime law issues related to the operation of unmanned autonomous cargo ships", WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0135-6
  20. Kim, I. Y.(2020), "Civil Liability concerning Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship", Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 75-109.
  21. Klein, N. et al.(2020), "Maritime autonomous vehicles: New frontiers in the law of the sea", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589320000226
  22. Korea Maritime Institute(2018), "A Study on the Policy Directions related to the Introduction of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS)", p. 37.
  23. Kuan, K. K., and Chau, P. Y.(2001), "A perception-based model for edi adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework," Information & Management, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp. 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8
  24. Lee, J. P. and Chang, M. Y.(2018), "A Study on the Intention to Use Big Data Based on the Technology Organization Environment and Innovation Diffusion Theory in Shipping and Port Organization," Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 159-182. https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2018.09.34.3.159
  25. Lee, O. K. et al.(2009), "Knowledge management systems diffusion in chinese enterprises: A multistage approach using the technology-organizationenvironment framework," Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 70-84. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2009010104
  26. Lee, S. and Kim, K. J.(2007), "Factors affecting the implementation success of internet-based information systems",. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1853-1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.001
  27. Li, X. and Yuen, K. F.(2022), "Autonomous ships: Astudy of critical success factors", Maritime Economics & Logistics, pp. 1-27.
  28. Li, Y. H.(2008), "An empirical investigation on the determinants of e-procurement adoption in Chinese manufacturing enterprises", International conference on management science and engineering (15th), pp. 32-37.
  29. Lin, H. F. and Lin, S. M.(2008), "Determinants of e-business diffusion: A test of the technology diffusion perspective", Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.003
  30. Liu, M.(2008), "Determinants of e-commerce development: An empirical study by firms in shaanxi, china," 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pp. 9177-9180.
  31. Low, C. et al.(2011), "Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption", Industrial management & data systems, Vol. 111, No. 7, pp. 1006-1023. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111161262
  32. Mallam, S. C. et al.(2020), "The human element in future Maritime Operations-perceived impact of autonomous shipping", Ergonomics, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 334-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1659995
  33. Oliveira, T. and Martins, M. F. O.(2008), "Acomparison of web site adoption in small and large portuguese firms," ICE-B 2008: Proceedings of the international conference on e-business, pp. 370-377.
  34. Oliveira, T. and Martins, M. F. O.(2011), "Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level," The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 110-121.
  35. Oliveira, T. et al.(2014), "Assesing the Determinants of Cloud Computing Adoption: An Analysis of the Manufacturing and Services Sectors," Information and Management, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006
  36. Pan, M. J. and Jang, W. Y.(2008), "Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan's communications," Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 94-102.
  37. Pervan, G. et al.(2005). "A study of the adoption and utilization of seven collaboration technologies in large organizations in Australia and New Zealand", Journal of Global Information Technology Management. Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2005.10856394
  38. Premkumar, G. and Roberts, M.(1999), "Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses", Omega, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1
  39. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovations, New York : The Free Press, 1995.
  40. Sarstedt, M. et al.(2014), "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers", Journal of family business strategy, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
  41. Shahbakhsh, M. et al.(2022), "Industrial revolutions and transition of the maritime industry: The case of Seafarer's role in autonomous shipping", The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.11.004
  42. Teo, T. S. et al.(2006), "Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of web-based business-to-business electronic commerce", IEEE Transactions on engineering Management, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.878106
  43. Tornatzky, L. G., and Fleischer, M.(1990), "The Processes of Technological Innovation", Lexington, M A:Lexington Books.
  44. Wang, Y. M. et al.(2010), "Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry", Technological forecasting and social change, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 803-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006
  45. Wisnicki, B. et al.(2021), "Critical areas for successful adoption of technological innovations in sea shipping-the autonomous ship case study", Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, pp. 1-27.
  46. Wright, R. G.(2019), "Intelligent autonomous ship navigation using multi-sensor modalities", TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 503-510. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.13.03.03
  47. Wu, L. and Chiu, M. L.(2015), "Organizational applications of IT innovation and firm's competitive performance: A resource-based view and the innovation diffusion approach", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 35, pp. 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.09.002
  48. Zhu, K. and Kraemer, K. L.(2005), "Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry," Information Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0045
  49. Zhu, K. et al.(2006), "Innovation diffusion in global contexts: Determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of european companies," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 601-616. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.300065
  50. Yoo, J. H. et al.(2019), "A Study on the Ordinary Practice of Seamen as a Controlling Principle of MASS and its Revision of Maritime Laws", Maritime LawReview, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 55-88.