DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Discussion on Home-Institutions' Relations with Reference to Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Saudi Arabia

  • Bagadood, Nizar H. (Faculty of Education, Umm Al-Qura University) ;
  • Saigh, Budor H. (Faculty of Education, Umm Al-Qura University)
  • Received : 2022.03.05
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

Private specialized institutions differ from public ones in that they mostly act independently. This paper reports a study designed to assess the provision of specialized institutions for children with intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. The approach taken in this study was qualitative, involving a case study strategy that enabled the researcher to gain rich and in-depth information based on the shared experiences of participants comprising institution leaders, educators and families from two specific specialized settings, one public and one private. The study aimed to examine the existing disparities in service delivery so as to develop a clear picture of the service quality provided by public specialized institutions for children with intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. The results suggest that the weak relationship with inpatient and specialized institutions is a consequence of the parents' poor responsiveness, which may result in these institutes developing a negative impression of the parents. Conversely, the lack of active initiative on the part of the public specialized institutions led to a negative parental attitude towards these institutions. A sensible approach to resolving this problem might be to recognize that these institutions have a significant responsibility to encourage parents of children with intellectual disabilities to become involved in their children's learning, to promote positive attitudes.

Keywords

References

  1. Alajmi, N. S. (2006). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Administrators' and special education teachers' perceptions regarding the use of functional behavior assessments for students with mental retardation (Doctoral Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison).
  2. Aldosari, M. S., & Pufpaff, L. A. (2014). Sources of stress among parents of children with intellectual disabilities: A preliminary investigation in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 3(1), 1-21.
  3. Aljadid, M. S. (2013). Disability in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 34(5), 453-460.
  4. Almasoud, H. (2013). Educating students with autism spectrum conditions (ASCS) In Saudi Arabia: Policy, practice, and provision for inclusive and special education
  5. Alquraini, T. A. (2012). Factors related to teachers' attitudes towards the inclusive education of students with severe intellectual disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(3), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01248.x
  6. Alrasheed, A. (2001). Is special education programs and services provided only for people with special «potentials»? Retrieved from: http://www.aljazirah.com/2001/20010925/ec16.htm
  7. Alsibai, A. (2012). Autism in the Kingdom needs greater attention. Retrieved from: http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=20120410121497
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Dobbins, M., & Abbott, L. (2010). Developing partnership with parents in special schools: parental perspectives from Northern Ireland. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01140.x
  10. Feiler, A. (2009). Engaging 'hard to reach' parents: Teacher-parent collaboration to promote children's learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Feiler, A. (2010). The UK 14-19 education reforms: Perspectives from a special school. Support for Learning, 25(4), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2010.01463.x
  12. Feiler, A. (2013). The views of students in the 14-19 phase attending three special schools and a secure unit on their learning and achievement. London Review of Education, 11(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2013.799810
  13. Japan International Cooperation Agency, (2002). Country profile on disability, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Planning and Evaluation Department.
  14. Lawson HA, Byers R, Rayner M, Aird R, Pease L (2015). Curriculum models, issues and tensions in Lacey P, Ashdown R, Jones P, Lawson H, Pipe M (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Severe, Profound and Multiple Learning Difficulties, London: Routledge.
  15. Ministry of Education of Saudi Arabia. (2002). Rules and regulations for special education institutes and programs.
  16. Park, Y. (2014). Analyzing dilemmas encountered by Korean special schoolteachers for students with intellectual disabilities in implementing transition services: A qualitative analysis based on the dilemma's framework (Doctoral Thesis, University of Iowa).
  17. Skora, H., Pillay, B., & Desai, I. (2001). Curricular skills valued by parents of children attending special developmental schools in Victoria. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 25(1-2), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1030011200024829
  18. Strnadova, I., & Cumming, T. M. (2014). The importance of quality transition processes for students with disabilities across settings: Learning from the current situation in New South Wales. Australian Journal of Education, 58(3), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944114543603
  19. Strnadova, I., & Evans, D. (2013). Schooling transitions within the lifespan of people with an intellectual disability: Perceptions and recommendations of ageing mothers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37(01), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2013.7
  20. UNICEF (2000). Defining quality in education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of the international working group on education Florence, Italy.