DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Estimation Methodology of Empirical Flow-density Diagram Using Vision Sensor-based Probe Vehicles' Time Headway Data

개별 차량의 비전 센서 기반 차두 시간 데이터를 활용한 경험적 교통류 모형 추정 방법론

  • Kim, Dong Min (Cho Chun Shik Graduate School of Mobility, KAIST) ;
  • Shim, Jisup (Department of Transport and Planning, Delft University of Technology)
  • Received : 2022.03.25
  • Accepted : 2022.04.21
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

This study explored an approach to estimate a flow-density diagram(FD) on a link in highway traffic environment by utilizing probe vehicles' time headway records. To study empirical flow-density diagram(EFD), the probe vehicles with vision sensors were recruited for collecting driving records for nine months and the vision sensor data pre-processing and GIS-based map matching were implemented. Then, we examined the new EFDs to evaluate validity with reference diagrams which is derived from loop detection traffic data. The probability distributions of time headway and distance headway as well as standard deviation of flow and density were utilized in examination. As a result, it turned out that the main factors for estimation errors are the limited number of probe vehicles and bias of flow status. We finally suggest a method to improve the accuracy of EFD model.

본 연구에서는 개별 차량의 차두 시간(time headway) 정보를 활용하여 고속도로 환경에서의 단일 링크에 대한 교통류 모형(flow-density diagram)을 추정하는 방법에 대해 탐구한다. 차두 시간 기반 교통류 모형(empirical flow-density diagram) 연구를 위해 차량용 비전 센서가 탑재된 실험 차량에서 9개월동안 수집된 데이터의 전처리 및 GIS 기반 맵 매칭을 수행한다. 기존의 교통류 모델식을 활용한 차두 시간 기반 교통류 모형(empirical flow-density diagram)의 검증을 위해, 차량 검지기 기반의 VDS(Vehicle Detection System) 데이터(loop detection traffic data) 기반 교통류 모형과 결과 비교 및 분석을 수행한다. 차두 시간 기반 교통류 모형의 추정 오차 원인을 분석하기 위해 각 교통류 모형의 차두 시간 및 차두 거리의 확률분포와 단위시간 교통량과 차량 밀도의 표준편차를 활용하였다. 분석 결과 링크 내 제한된 샘플 차량 대수 및 수집 데이터에 대한 주행환경 편향성이 추정 오차의 주된 요인이며. 이에 따른 추정 오차 개선을 위한 방법에 대해 제안한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국연구재단의 이공분야 학문후속세대양성(NRF-2020R1A6A3A03037304) 사업 지원으로 수행하였습니다.

References

  1. Anuar, K., Habtemichael, F. and Cetin, M.(2015), "Estimating traffic flow rate on freeways from probe vehicle data and fundamental diagram", In 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, pp.2921-2926.
  2. Boamah, S. A.(2010), Spatial and temporal analyses of traffic flow in the city of Almelo: In search for a microscopic fundamental diagram (MFD), Master's Thesis, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, pp.39-83.
  3. Cassidy, M. J., Jang, K. and Daganzo, C. F.(2011), "Macroscopic fundamental diagrams for freeway networks: Theory and observation", Transportation Research Record, vol. 2260, no. 1, pp.8-15. https://doi.org/10.3141/2260-02
  4. Clairais, A., Duret, A. and El Faouzi, N. E.(2016), "Calibration of the fundamental diagram based on loop and probe data", Transportation Research Record, vol. 2560, no. 1, pp.17-25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2560-03
  5. Cowan, R. J.(1975), "Useful headway models", Transportation Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp.371-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(75)90008-8
  6. Deng, Y., Li, M., Tang, Q., He, R. and Hu, X.(2020), "Heterogenous trip distance-based route choice behavior analysis using real-world large-scale taxi trajectory data", Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2020.
  7. Dong, S., Wang, H., Hurwitz, D., Zhang, G. and Shi, J.(2015), "Nonparametric modeling of vehicle-type-specific headway distribution in freeway work zones", Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 141, no. 11, 05015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000788
  8. Edie, L. C.(1965), "Discussion of traffic stream measurements and definitions", Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, Paris, France: OECD, pp.139-154.
  9. Ha, D. H., Aron, M. and Cohen, S.(2012), "Time headway variable and probabilistic modeling", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 25, pp.181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.002
  10. Kerner, B. S. and Lieu, H.(2005), "The Physics of Traffic: Empirical Freeway Pattern Features", Engineering Applications; and Theory. Physics Today, vol. 58, no. 11, pp.54-56, pp.1-86.
  11. Korea Expressway Corporation, http://www.ex.co.kr, 2022.03.21.
  12. Li, L. and Chen, X. M.(2017), "Vehicle headway modeling and its inferences in macroscopic/microscopic traffic flow theory: A survey", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 76, pp.170-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.007
  13. Mobileye an Intel Company, https://www.mobileye.com, 2022.03.23.
  14. Richards, P. I.(1956), "Shock waves on the highway", Operations Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.42-51. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.4.1.42
  15. Seo, T., Kawasaki, Y., Kusakabe, T. and Asakura, Y.(2019), "Fundamental diagram estimation by using trajectories of probe vehicles", Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 122, pp.40-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.02.005
  16. Shim, J., Yeo, J., Lee, S. and Jang, K.(2017), "Deriving Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams Using Probe Vehicle Data Based on DSRC", The Journal of the Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp.29-41. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.6.29
  17. Shim, J., Yeo, J., Lee, S., Hamdar, S. H. and Jang, K.(2019), "Empirical evaluation of influential factors on bifurcation in macroscopic fundamental diagrams", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 102, pp.509-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.005
  18. Treiber, M. and Kesting, A.(2013), Traffic flow dynamics, Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp.13-36.
  19. Wardrop, J. G.(1952), "Road paper. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 1, no. 3, pp.325-362. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1952.11259
  20. Xu, Z.(2016), Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD) Estimation Based on Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) Connected Vehicle Data, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, pp.78-86.
  21. Yin, S., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Yao, D., Su, Y. and Li, L.(2009), "Headway distribution modeling with regard to traffic status", In 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IEEE, pp.1057-1062.
  22. Zhang, G. and Wang, Y.(2014), "A Gaussian kernel-based approach for modeling vehicle headway distributions", Transportation Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp.206-216. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1120.0451
  23. Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Wei, H. and Chen, Y.(2007), "Examining headway distribution models with urban freeway loop event data", Transportation Research Record, vol. 1999, no. 1, pp.141-149. https://doi.org/10.3141/1999-15
  24. Zhu, J. and Ye, X.(2018), "Development of destination choice model with pairwise district-level constants using taxi GPS data", Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 93, pp.410-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.016