PNF and Movement

  • 제20권1호
  • /
  • Pages.135-145
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2508-6227(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6472(eISSN)
대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회 (Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정지신호과제의 수행에 따른 보행정지 시 다리 근전도 및 지면반발력 비교

Comparison of Lower Extremity Electromyography and Ground Reaction Force during Gait Termination according to the Performance of the Stop Signal Task

  • 구동균 (단국대학교 보건학과 물리치료학전공) ;
  • 권중원 (단국대학교 공공보건대학 물리치료학과)
  • Koo, Dong-Kyun (Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Dankook University) ;
  • Kwon, Jung-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare Sciences, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.08
  • 심사 : 2022.04.13
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between cognitive and motor inhibition by comparing muscle activity and ground reaction force during unplanned gait termination according to reaction time measured through the stop-signal task. Methods: Sixteen young adults performed a stop-signal task and an unplanned gait termination separately. The subjects were divided into fast and slow groups based on their stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), as measured by the stop-signal task. Electromyography (EMG) and ground reaction force (GRF) were compared between the groups during unplanned gait termination. The data for gait termination were divided into three phases (Phase 1 to 3). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare spatiotemporal gait parameters and EMG and GRF data between groups. Results: The slow group had significantly higher activity of the tibialis anterior in Phase 2 and Phase 3 than the fast group (p <0.05). In Phase 1, the fast group had significantly shorter time to peak amplitude (TPA) of the soleus than the slow group (p <0.05). In Phase 2, the TPA of the tibialis anterior was significantly lower in the fast group than the slow group (p <0.05). In Phase 3, there was no significant difference in the GRF between the two groups (p >0.05). There were no significant difference between the two groups in the spatiotemporal gait parameters (p >0.05). Conclusion: Compared to the slow group, the fast group with cognitive inhibition suppressed muscle activity for unplanned gait termination. The association between SSRT and unplanned gait termination shows that a participant's ability to suppress an incipient finger response is relevant to their ability to construct a corrective gait pattern in a choice-demanding environment.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2021R1F1A1052236).

참고문헌

  1. Abdulhasan ZM, Buckley JG. Gait termination on declined compared to level surface; contribution of terminating and trailing limb work in arresting centre of mass velocity. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2019;66:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.02.013
  2. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, Frank MJ, Poldrack RA. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(14):3743-52. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-07.2007
  3. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26(9):2424-33. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006
  4. Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8(4):170-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010
  5. Band GP, Van Der Molen MW, Logan GD. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica. 2003;112(2):105-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3
  6. Barkley RA. The executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsychology Review. 2001;11(1):1-29. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009085417776
  7. Bishop M, Brunt D, Pathare N, Patel B. The effect of velocity on the strategies used during gait termination. Gait & Posture. 2004;20(2):134-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2003.07.004
  8. Bishop MD, Brunt D, Pathare N, Patel B. The interaction between leading and trailing limbs during stopping in humans. Neuroscience Letters. 2002;323(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02525-3
  9. Bolton DA, Mansour M. A modified lean and release technique to emphasize response inhibition and action selection in reactive balance. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). 2020(157):e60688.
  10. Braun BL. Knowledge and perception of fall-related risk factors and fall-reduction techniques among community-dwelling elderly individuals. Physical Therapy. 1998;78(12):1262-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.12.1262
  11. Cao C, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB, Alexander NB. Effects of age, available response time and gender on ability to stop suddenly when walking. Gait & Posture. 1998;8(2):103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(98)00029-0
  12. Cesar GM, Sigward SM. Dynamic stability during running gait termination: Differences in strategies between children and adults to control forward momentum. Human Movement Science. 2015;43:138-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.005
  13. Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2009;33(5):631-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.016
  14. Chevrier AD, Noseworthy MD, Schachar R. Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping. 2007;28(12):1347-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20355
  15. Collins A, Koechlin E. Reasoning, learning, and creativity: frontal lobe function and human decision-making. PLoS Biology. 2012;10(3):e1001293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293
  16. De Leeuw JR. jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods. 2015;47(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
  17. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64:135-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
  18. Ettenhofer ML, Hambrick DZ, Abeles N. Reliability and stability of executive functioning in older adults. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(5):607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.607
  19. Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2004;133(1):101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
  20. Goetz J, Beckmann J, Koeck F, Grifka J, Dullien S, Heers G. Gait analysis after tibialis anterior tendon rupture repair using Z-plasty. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2013;52(5):598-601. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.01.007
  21. Hase K, Stein R. Analysis of rapid stopping during human walking. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998;80(1):255-61. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.255
  22. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2000;10(5):361-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
  23. Hof A, Elzinga H, Grimmius W, Halbertsma J. speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. Gait & Posture. 2002;16(1):78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00206-5
  24. Jaeger R, Vanitchatchavan P. Ground reaction forces during termination of human gait. Journal of Biomechanics. 1992;25(10):1233-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90080-K
  25. Jian Y, Winter DA, Ishac MG, Gilchrist L. Trajectory of the body COG and COP during initiation and termination of gait. Gait & posture. 1993;1(1):9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(93)90038-3
  26. Jung S, Yi J, Song C. Biomechanical alterations of gait termination in middle-aged and elderly women. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2016;28(3):861-7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.861
  27. Kimberg DY, D'esposito M, Farah MJ. Cognitive functions in the prefrontal cortex-Working memory and executive control. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1997;6(6):185-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772959
  28. Lamy JC, Iglesias C, Lackmy A, Nielsen JB, Katz R, Marchand-Pauvert V. Modulation of recurrent inhibition from knee extensors to ankle motoneurones during human walking. The Journal of Physiology. 2008;586(24):5931-46. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160630
  29. Li C-sR, Huang C, Constable RT, Sinha R. Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26(1):186-92. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3741-05.2006
  30. Liu-Ambrose T, Nagamatsu LS, Hsu CL, Bolandzadeh N. Emerging concept: 'central benefit model'of exercise in falls prevention. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;47(2):115-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090725
  31. Liu MQ, Anderson FC, Schwartz MH, Delp SL. Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds. Journal of Biomechanics. 2008;41(15):3243-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.031
  32. Manza P, Amandola M, Tatineni V, Li C-sR, Leung H-C. Response inhibition in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of dopaminergic medication and disease duration effects. npj Parkinson's Disease. 2017;3(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-016-0004-y
  33. McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking. The international Journal of Robotics Research. 1990;9(2):62-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499000900206
  34. Menant JC, Steele JR, Menz HB, Munro BJ, Lord SR. Rapid gait termination: effects of age, walking surfaces and footwear characteristics. Gait & Posture. 2009;30(1):65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.03.003
  35. Nagano, H., Sparrow, W. A., & Begg, R. K. Biomechanical characteristics of slipping during unconstrained walking, turning, gait initiation and termination. Ergonomics, 2013;56(6);1038-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.787122
  36. Neptune RR, Sasaki K, Kautz SA. The effect of walking speed on muscle function and mechanical energetics. Gait & Posture. 2008;28(1):135-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.004
  37. Patla AE. Adaptive human locomotion: influence of neural, biological and mechanical factors on control mechanisms. Clinical Disorders of Balance, Posture and Gait. 2004;2.
  38. Ridge ST, Henley J, Manal K, Miller F, Richards JG. Biomechanical analysis of gait termination in 11-17 year old youth at preferred and fast walking speeds. Human Movement Science. 2016;49:178-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.07.001
  39. Rubia K, Smith AB, Brammer MJ, Taylor E. Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection. Neuroimage. 2003;20(1):351-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00275-1
  40. Rubia K, Smith AB, Taylor E, Brammer M. Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes. Human Brain Mapping. 2007;28(11):1163-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20347
  41. Rydalch G, Bell HB, Ruddy KL, Bolton DA. Stop-signal reaction time correlates with a compensatory balance response. Gait & Posture. 2019;71:273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.05.015
  42. Schuch S. Task inhibition and response inhibition in older vs. younger adults: A diffusion model analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:1722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722
  43. Shield, S., & Patel, A. Balancing stability and maneuverability during rapid gait termination in fast biped robots. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2017;4523-30.
  44. Sparrow W, Tirosh O. Gait termination: a review of experimental methods and the effects of ageing and gait pathologies. Gait & Posture. 2005;22(4):362-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.11.005
  45. Stief F. Variations of marker sets and models for standard gait analysis. Handbook of Human Motion, 1st ed; Muller, B, Wolf, S, Eds. 2018:509-23.
  46. Tirosh O, Sparrow W. Age and walking speed effects on muscle recruitment in gait termination. Gait & Posture. 2005;21(3):279-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.03.002
  47. Veale JF. Edinburgh handedness inventory-short form: a revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 2014;19(2):164-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045
  48. Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Band GP, Beste C, Bissett PG, Brockett AT, et al. A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. elife. 2019;8:e46323. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.46323
  49. Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008;12(11):418-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005
  50. Vrieling AH, Van Keeken H, Schoppen T, Otten E, Halbertsma J, Hof A, et al. Gait termination in lower limb amputees. Gait & Posture. 2008;27(1):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.004
  51. Wang J, Wai Y, Weng Y, Ng K, Huang Y-Z, Ying L, et al. Functional MRI in the assessment of cortical activation during gait-related imaginary tasks. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2009;116(9):1087-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-009-0269-y
  52. Weerdesteyn V, Schillings A, Van Galen G, Duysens J. Distraction affects the performance of obstacle avoidance during walking. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2003;35(1):53-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890309602121
  53. Wei W, Wang X-J. Inhibitory control in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loop: complex regulation and interplay with memory and decision processes. Neuron. 2016;92(5):1093-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.031
  54. Wessel JR, Aron AR. On the globality of motor suppression: unexpected events and their influence on behavior and cognition. Neuron. 2017;93(2):259-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013
  55. Wylie S, Ridderinkhof K, Eckerle M, Manning C. Inefficient response inhibition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(7):1408-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.003