디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.301-308
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

서번트 리더십이 안전 행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 안전감의 매개 효과 및 조망 수용의 조절 효과

The Influence of Servant Leadership on Safety Behavior: the Mediating Effect of Psychological Safety and Moderating Effect of Perspective Taking

  • Kim, Byung-Jik (Department of Business Administration, University of Ulsan)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.27
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 서번트 리더십이 안전 행동에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 살펴보았을 뿐만 아니라, 이 두 변인 사이의 작동 기제, 즉 매개 변인 및 조절 변인에 대해 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 서번트 리더십과 안전 행동 사이에서 구성원들의 심리적 안전감이 매개할 것이며, 이에 더해 이들의 관점 수용 능력이 서번트 리더십과 심리적 안전감 사이를 조절할 것이라는 가설을 설정하였다. 이를 실증적으로 검증하고자, 국내 기업에 재직 중인 235명의 직원들로부터 세 시점에 걸쳐서 수집한 설문 조사 자료를 활용하여 구조 방정식 모형 분석을 실시했다. 분석 결과, 서번트 리더십은 직원들의 심리적 안전감을 매개로 안전 행동을 향상시켰다. 이에 더해서, 관점 수용 능력은 서번트 리더십이 심리적 안전감에 미치는 긍정적 영향력을 증폭시켰다.

The current paper not only investigates the intermediating process of the association between servant leadership and safety behavior, but also tries to find a factor which enhances the positive influence of servant leadership. To do that, this study tried to identify the mediating effect of employee's psychological safety between servant leadership and safety behavior, as well as the moderating influence of perspective taking ability in the servant leadership-psychological safety link. By utilizing 3 wave survey data from 235 employees in Korean companies with conducting structural equation modeling(SEM), this paper found that servant leadership had a positive influence on safety behavior through mediating effect of employee's psychological safety. In addition, the perspective taking ability positively moderated the positive impact of servant leadership on psychological safety.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6
  2. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
  3. Barbuto Jr, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106287091
  4. Mayer, D. M., Bardes, M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2008). Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701743558
  5. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership:Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
  6. Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., &Weinberger, E. (2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316-331 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.12.001
  7. Kim, Y. J., & Kim, B. J. (2021). The Meditating Effect of Psychological Safety on the Relationship between Servant Leadership and Innovative Behavior: The Importance of Authentic Leadership. Korean Management Consulting Review, 21(1), 173-186.
  8. Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B., & Roberts, J. A.(2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012695
  9. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x
  10. Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
  11. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2003). Stress in organizations. In: Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., Klimoski, R.J. (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12. Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 453-491.
  12. Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55(2), 429-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x
  13. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
  14. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 93-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25003-6
  15. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  16. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  17. Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. 2001. Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1085-1100. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069390
  18. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
  19. Gilboa, S., Shirom, A., Fried, Y., & Cooper, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x
  20. Sampson, J. M., DeArmond, S., & Chen, P. Y. (2014). Role of safety stressors and social support on safety performance. Safety Science, 64, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.025
  21. Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Arnold, T., Frazier, M. L., & Finch, D. M. (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013090
  22. Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S. E., Liu, Y., & Lee, J. (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (Vol. 2). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  23. Maule, A. J., & Hockey, G. R. J. (1993). State, stress, and time pressure. In Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 83-101). Springer, Boston, MA.
  24. Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. 2014. Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007
  25. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
  26. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives." Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  27. Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. 1996. Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: a merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
  28. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411