The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제14권2호
  • /
  • Pages.78-87
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials

  • Karaokutan, Isil (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University) ;
  • Ozel, Gulsum Sayin (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.24
  • 심사 : 2022.03.02
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion, 110 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons (P < .05). RESULTS. Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type (P < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 ㎛ air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC. CONCLUSION. The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:1073-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01330.x
  2. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:625-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x
  3. Gehrke P, Johannson D, Fischer C, Stawarczyk B, Beuer F. In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one-and two-piece CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:546-54. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3942
  4. Elsayed A, Wille S, Al-Akhali M, Kern M. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:20-7.
  5. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Mattiola A. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007;2:296-310.
  6. Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, Hess T, Kretschmar S. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:151-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60046-8
  7. Marchack CB. A custom titanium abutment for the anterior single-tooth implant. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:288-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90173-0
  8. Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hammerle CH, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:4-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x
  9. Jung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:251-7.
  10. Alsahhaf A, Spies BC, Vach K, Kohal RJ. Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;66:224-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.11.018
  11. Lin WS, Harris BT, Zandinejad A, Martin WC, Morton D. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:181-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.013
  12. Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:304-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6
  13. Conejo J, Kobayashi T, Anadioti E, Blatz MB. Performance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic implant-supported restorations bonded to titanium inserts: A systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:139-46.
  14. Abdulkader KF, Elnaggar GAE, Kheiralla LS. Shear bond strength of cemented zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics (Celtra Duo) with two surface treatments (in vitro study). J Adhes Sci Technol 2021;35:35-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1785082
  15. Abdalla MM, Ali IAA, Khan K, Mattheos N, Murbay S, Matinlinna JP, Neelakantan P. The influence of surface roughening and polishing on microbial biofilm development on different ceramic materials. J Prosthodont 2021;30:447-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13260
  16. Dhesi GS, Sidhu S, Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M. Evaluation of adhesion protocol for titanium base abutments to different ceramic and hybrid materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2021;29:22-34.
  17. Kemarly K, Arnason SC, Parke A, Lien W, Vandewalle KS. Effect of various surface treatments on Ti-base coping retention. Oper Dent 2020;45:426-34. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-155-lr
  18. Guilherme N, Wadhwani C, Zheng C, Chung KH. Effect of surface treatments on titanium alloy bonding to lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:797-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.023
  19. Pitta J, Burkhardt F, Mekki M, Fehmer V, Mojon P, Sailer I. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion of a titanium base abutment on the stability of the bonded interface and retention forces of crowns after artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:214-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.013
  20. Alkhadashi A, Guven MC, Erol F, Yildirim G. The effect of different combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the shear bond strength between titanium alloy and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020;40:271-6. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3893
  21. de Almeida-Junior AA, Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, AbiRached Fde O, Adabo GL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium. Braz Dent J 2010;21:111-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000200004
  22. Abi-Rached Fde O, Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, de Almeida-Junior AA, Adabo GL. The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to titanium. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:370-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60194-2
  23. Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, Almeida-Junior AA, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Adabo GL. Efficacy of air-abrasion technique and additional surface treatment at titanium/resin cement interface. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:453-9. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a23444
  24. Elsaka SE, Swain MV. Effect of surface treatments on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cements to titanium. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:65-71.
  25. Fabian Fonzar R, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Louca C, Ferrari M, Vichi A. Influence of acid concentration and etching time on composite cement adhesion to lithium-silicate glass ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2020;22:175-82.
  26. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of five dental silanes on bonding a luting cement onto silica-coated titanium. J Dent 2006;34:721-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.01.005
  27. Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Hass V, Malaquias P, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, Perdigao J, Loguercio A. Effect of MDP-containing silane and adhesive used alone or in combination on the long-term bond strength and chemical interaction with lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:203-12.
  28. von Maltzahn NF, Holstermann J, Kohorst P. Retention forces between titanium and zirconia components of two-part implant abutments with different techniques of surface modification. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:735-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12352
  29. Freifrau von Maltzahn N, Bernard S, Kohorst P. Two-part implant abutments with titanium and ceramic components: Surface modification affects retention forces-An in-vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:903-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13495
  30. Nakhaei M, Fendereski Z, Alavi S, Mohammadipour HS. The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium. J Clin Exp Dent 2019;11:e820-8.
  31. Linkevicius T, Caplikas A, Dumbryte I, Linkeviciene L, Svediene O. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:949-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.012
  32. Mehl C, Zhang Q, Lehmann F, Kern M. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:214-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.020
  33. Bankoglu Gungor M, Karakoca Nemli S. The effect of resin cement type and thermomechanical aging on the retentive strength of custom zirconia abutments bonded to titanium inserts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:523-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5920
  34. ISO 9693. Metal-ceramic dental restorative systems. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 1999. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/23716.html
  35. ISO 10477. Dentistry - Polymer-based crown and veneering materials. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2018. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/68235.html
  36. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strength of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:315-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114823
  37. Pitta J, Todorovic A, Fehmer V, Strasding M, Sailer I. Technical complication of a zirconia multiple-unit FDP supported by titanium base abutments - case report on a bonding failure and treatment alternative. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:518-27. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7194
  38. Zhang LX, Hong DW, Zheng M, Yu H. Is the bond strength of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate lower than that of lithium disilicate? A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthodont Res 2021 Dec 1. Epub ahead of print.