과제정보
The authors thank Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland, for providing the reference model and the use of the IOS Trios 3 and Trios 4, respectively; as well as Dentsply Sirona, Dattwil-Baden, Switzerland, for making the Primescan available. Also, thanks to Dr. Urs Simmen for statistical support and Mr. James Ashmann for English proofreading the final draft of the manuscript.
참고문헌
- Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mormann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:101-29.
- Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:e185-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12600
- Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:403-6.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003
- Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P, Kovaltschuk I, Bragger U, Zitzmann NU. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1318-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12982
- Di Fiore A, Vigolo P, Graiff L, Stellini E. Digital vs conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: a comparison of key considerations. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:577-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5938
- Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12234
- Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:761-3. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258
- Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
- Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for fullarch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 2016;38:422-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv077
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision. J Vis Exp 2014;(86):51374.
- Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
- Seo SW, Lee WS, Byun JY, Lee KB. A standardization model based on image recognition for performance evaluation of an oral scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:409-15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.409
- Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CADCAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20:1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041157
- Bernauer SA, Muller J, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. Influence of preparation design, marginal gingiva location, and tooth morphology on the accuracy of digital impressions for full-crown restorations: an in vitro investigation. J Clin Med 2020;9:3984. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123984
- Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Lauer AW, Patel RB, Ludlow ME, Renne WG. Evaluation of the effect scan pattern has on the trueness and precision of six intraoral digital impression systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12371
- Kaewbuasa N, Ongthiemsak C. Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners. J Adv Prosthodont 2021;13:205-15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.205
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163107
- Rutkunas V, Borusevicius R, Liaudanskaite D, Jasinskyte U, Drukteinis S, Bukelskiene V, Mijiritsky E. The effect of different cleaning protocols of polymer-based prosthetic materials on the behavior of human gingival fibroblasts. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:7753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217753
- Albdour EA, Shaheen E, Vranckx M, Mangano FG, Politis C, Jacobs R. A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0580-9
- Ferrari M, Keeling A, Mandelli F, Lo Giudice G, Garcia-Godoy F, Joda T. The ability of marginal detection using different intraoral scanning systems: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent 2018;31:272-6.
- Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
- Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0
- Tibballs J. Standards for digital dental impressions. Nordic Institute of Dental Materials. 2015. Available from: https://niom.no/standards-for-digital-dental-impressions/.