East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Economic Cooperation Potential of East Asia's RCEP Agreement

  • Received : 2022.03.01
  • Accepted : 2022.03.24
  • Published : 2022.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

East Asia's Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) came into force in 2022 as the world's largest free trade agreement. RCEP was concluded, signed and brought into force in the face of major international uncertainty and is a significant boost to the global trading system. RCEP brings Australia, China, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand into the same agreement with the ten member ASEAN group at its centre. It keeps markets open and updates trade and investment rules in East Asia, a major centre of global economic activity, at a time of rising protectionism when the WTO itself is under threat. The agreement builds on ASEAN's free trade agreements and strengthens ASEAN centrality. One of the pillars of RCEP is an economic cooperation agenda which has its antecedents in ASEAN's approach to bringing along its least developed members and builds on the experience of capacity building in APEC and technical cooperation under the ASEAN Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. There is an opportunity to create a framework that facilitates deeper economic cooperation that involves experience-sharing, extending RCEP's rules and membership at the same time as strengthening political cooperation. The paper suggests some areas that might be best suited to cooperation - that is confidence and trust building instead of or before negotiation - and discusses how non-members may be engaged and the membership expanded. Options such as multilateralising provisions and becoming a platform for policy convergence and coordinating unilateral reforms are canvassed.

Keywords

References

  1. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2020. "RCEP Regulation Impact Statement." Attachment under the title, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. https://obpr.pmc.gov.au/published-impact-analyses-and-reports/regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-agreement (accessed March 24, 2022)
  2. Armstrong, S. 2018. "Japan joins to shape China's Belt and Road." East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2018/10/28/japan-joins-to-shape-chinas-belt-and-road/ (accessed February 21, 2022)
  3. Armstrong, S., Basri, C., Bery, S., de Brouwer, G., Drysdale, P., Huang, Y., Itoh, M., Quah, D., Somkiat, T., Smith, H., Taylor, J., Triggs, A. and J. Wang. 2020. "An Asian Strategy for Recovery and Reconstruction After COVID-19." Asian Bureau of Economic Research. https://eaber.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/post_covid19_asia_strategy_1.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  4. Armstrong, S., Drysdale, P. and S. Tay. 2019. "Collective Leadership for East Asia and ASEAN's Trans-Asian Role." In Tay, S., Armstrong, S., Drysdale, P. and P. S. Intal. (eds.) Collective Leadership, ASEAN Centrality, and Strengthening the ASEAN Institutional Ecosystem. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. pp. 33-48. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/6.AV2040_VOL2_Collective_Leadership.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  5. Armstrong, S., Maria, R. S. and T. Watanabe. 2021. "Towards an Asia-Pacific Digital Economy Governance Regime." RIETI Policy Update, no. 092. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/special/policy-update/092.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  6. Asian Development Bank. 2020. "Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Overview and Economic Impact." ADB Briefs, no. 164. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/664096/adb-brief-164-regional-comprehensive-eco nomic-partnership.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  7. Deardorff, A. 2014. "Trade Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and Other Asian Countries." Asian Development Review, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00035
  8. Dee, P. 2010. "Chapter 2: Services Liberalization toward the ASEAN Economic Community." In Urata, S. and M. Okabe. (eds.) Tracing the Progress toward the ASEAN Economic Community. ERIA Research Project Report 2009, no. 3. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
  9. Drysdale, P. 2017. "ASEAN: The Experiment in Open Regionalism that Succeeded." In Sta Maria, R., Urata, S. and P. S. Intal. (eds.) The ASEAN Economic Community Into 2025 and Beyond. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. pp. 64-86. https://www.eria.org/5.1.ASEAN_50_Vol_5_Drysdale.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  10. Drysdale, P. and M. Pangestu. 2019. "RECP Leverages Political Security through Economic Security." East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/10/06/rcep-leverages-political-security-through-economic-security/ (accessed February 21, 2022)
  11. Drysdale, P., King, A. and A. Triggs. 2022a forthcoming. "Asia's Economic and Political Security in a Shifting Global Order." In Armstrong, S., Triggs, A. and T. Westland. (eds.) Navigating Economic Prosperity and National Security in East Asia. Canberra: ANU Press.
  12. Drysdale, P., Narjoko, D. and R. Sta Maria. 2022b forthcoming. "ASEAN and the Role of Asian Regionalism in Managing Asymmetric Power." In Armstrong, S., Triggs, A. and T. Westland. (eds.) Navigating Economic Prosperity and National Security in East Asia. Canberra: ANU Press.
  13. Findlay, C. and E. Pedrosa. 2020. "Why RCEP is a big deal." East Asia Forum. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/11/30/why-rcep-is-a-big-deal/ (accessed February 21, 2022)
  14. Garnaut, R. 1996. Open Regionalism and Trade Liberalization: An Asia-Pacific Contribution to the World Trade System. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  15. Hamanaka, S. 2014. "TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting." Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 163-186. https://www.kiep.go.kr/gallery.es?mid=a20307000000&bid=0022&act=view&list_no=7847&act=view&list_no=7847&cg_code= (accessed February 21, 2022) https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2014.18.2.279
  16. Hill, H. and J. Menon. 2014. "ASEAN Commercial Policy: A Rare Case of Outward-Looking Regional Integration." ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, no. 144. Asian Development Bank.
  17. Kalirajan, K. and Y. Liu. 2016. "Renewable Energy Trade within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Countries: An Exploratory Analysis." ASARC Working Papers, no. 2016/05. Australia South Asia Research Centre. https://acde.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication/acde_crawford_anu_edu_au/2016-09/wp2016-05_kalirajan_liu.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  18. Natalegawa, M. 2013. "An Indonesian Perspective on the Indo-Pacific." TheJakartaPost. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/05/20/an-indonesian-perspective-indo-pacific.html (accessed March 24, 2022)
  19. Pangestu, M. and S. Armstrong. 2021. "Chapter 2: East Asian Architecture of Integration." In Kimura, F., Pangestu, M., Thangavelu, S. and C. Findlay. (eds.) Handbook on East Asian Economic Integration. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. pp. 21-48.
  20. Petri, P. A. and M. G. Plummer. 2020. "East Asia decouples from the United States: Trade war, COVID-19, and East Asia's new trade blocs." PIIE Working Paper, no. 20-9. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/system/files/documents/wp20-9.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)
  21. Petri, P. A. and M. G. Plummer. 2021. "The Economics of Conflict and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: RCEP, CPTPP and the US-China Trade War." East Asian Economic Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 233-272. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2021.25.3.397
  22. RCEP Secretariat. 2020. "Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement." https://rcepsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/All-Chapters.pdf (accessed February 21, 2022)