Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance assessment of the precast concrete buildings using FEMA P-695 methodology

  • Adibi, Mahdi (School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bojnord) ;
  • Talebkhah, Roozbeh (School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bojnord)
  • Received : 2020.07.03
  • Accepted : 2022.01.13
  • Published : 2022.04.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The precast reinforced concrete frame system is a method for industrialization of construction. However, the seismic performance factor of this structural system is not explicitly clarified in some existing building codes. In this paper, the seismic performance factor for the existing precast concrete building frame systems with cast-in-situ reinforced shear walls were evaluated. Nonlinear behavior of the precast beam-column joints and cast-in-situ reinforced shear walls were considered in the modeling of the structures. The ATC-19's coefficient method was used for calculating the seismic performance factor and the FEMA P-695's approach was adopted for evaluating the accuracy of the computed seismic performance factor. The results showed that the over-strength factor varies from 2 to 2.63 and the seismic performance factor (R factor) varies from 5.1 to 8.95 concerning the height of the structure. Also, it was proved that all of the examined buildings have adequate safety against the collapse at the MCE level of earthquake, so the validity of R factors was confirmed. The obtained incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) results indicated that the minimum adjusted collapse margin ratio (ACMR) of the precast buildings representing the seismic vulnerability of the structures approximately equaled to 2.7, and pass the requirements of FEMA P-695.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI-318-10 (2010), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  2. Adibi, M., Marefat, M.S. and Allahvirdizadeh, R. (2018), "Nonlinear modeling of cyclic response of RC beam-column joints reinforced by plain bars", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16(11), 5529-5556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0399-4.
  3. Adibi, M. and Talebkhah, R. (2020), "Development of seismic fragility curves for the existing RC building with plain bars", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1864667.
  4. Adibi, M., Talebkhah, R. and Yahyaabadi, A. (2019), "Simulation of cyclic response of precast concrete beam-column joints", Comput. Concrete, 24(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.3.223.
  5. Adibi, M., Talebkhah, R. and Yahyaabadi, A. (2020), "Nonlinear modeling of exterior beam-column joints in precast concrete buildings", J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 8(9), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.22065/JSCE.2020.184234.1854.
  6. Adibi, M., Yahyaabadi, A. and Talebkhah, R. (2021), "Seismic behavior assessment of RC precast frame damaged in Bojnord Earthquake 2017 considering soil-structure interaction effects", Amirkabir J. Civil Eng., 53(7), 19-19. https://doi.org/10.22060/CEEJ.2020.17608.6633.
  7. Ansari, M. (2018), "Evaluation of seismic performance of mid-rise reinforced concrete frames subjected to far-field and near-field ground motions", Earthq. Struct., 15(5), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.5.453.
  8. ASCE-7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  9. ASCE-41-13 (2014), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  10. ATC-19 (1995), Structural Response Modification Factors, Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, California.
  11. Bahrami, S. and Madhkhan, M. (2017), "Experimental performance of a new precast beam to column connection using hidden corbel", Asian J. Civil Eng. (BHRC), 18(5), 791-805.
  12. Darbhanzi, A., Marefat, M.S., Khanmohammadi, M., Moradimanesh, A. and Zare, H. (2018), "Seismic performance of retrofitted URM walls with diagonal and vertical steel strips", Earthq. Struct., 14(5), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.449.
  13. Divan, M. and Madhkhan, M. (2011), "Determination of behavior coefficient of prefabricated concrete frame ith prefabricated shear walls", Procedia Eng., 14(1), 3229-3236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.408.
  14. FEMA 450-1 (2004), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  15. FEMA P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  16. Girgin, S.C., Misir, I.S. and Kahraman, S. (2017), "Seismic performance factors for precast buildings with hybrid beam-column connections", Procedia Eng., 199(1), 3540-3545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.510.
  17. Habibi, A., Gholami, R. and Izadpanah, M. (2019), "Behavior factor of vertically irregular RCMRFs based on incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Struct., 16(6), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.655.
  18. Hall, J.F. (2006), "Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(5), 525-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.541.
  19. Hashemi, S.S., Madhkhan, M. and Moghadam, A.S. (2011), "Evaluation of reduction factor for precast concrete large panel buildings", J. Comput. Meth. Eng. (ESTEGHLAL), 22(1), 11-31.
  20. Hashemi, S.S., Sadeghi, K., Vaghefi, M. and Shayan, K. (2017), "Evaluation of ductility and response modification factor in moment-resisting steel frames with CFT columns", Earthq. Struct., 12(6), 643-652. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.6.643.
  21. HAZUS-MH MR5 (2005), Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology Model, FEMA, Washington, D.C.
  22. Hwang, K.R. and Lee, H.S. (2015), "Seismic performance of a 10-story RC box-type wall building structure", Earthq. Struct., 9(6), 1193-1219. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1193.
  23. Karadogan, H., Bal, I., Yuksel, E., Yuce, S.Z., Durgun, Y. and Soydan, C. (2015), "An algorithm to justify the design of single story precast structures", Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Springer, Cham.
  24. Kehila, F., Kibboua, A., Bechtoula, H. and Remki, M. (2018), "Seismic performance assessment of RC bridge piers designed with the Algerian seismic bridges regulation", Earthq. Struct., 15(6), 701-713. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.701.
  25. Khorami, M., Alvansazyazdi, M., Shariati, M., Zandi, Y., Jalali, A. and Tahir, M. (2017), "Seismic performance evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis method (IDA)", Earthq. Struct., 13(6), 531-538. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.531.
  26. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2005), "Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames", Eng. Struct., 27(2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009.
  27. Lee, D., Shin, S. and Ju, Y.K. (2016), "Evaluation of seismic performance factors for steel DIAGRID structural system design", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 735-755. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.735.
  28. Lee, H.S., Hwang, K.R. and Kim, Y.H. (2015), "Seismic performance of a 1: 15-scale 25-story RC flat-plate core-wall building model", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(6), 929-953. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2493.
  29. Lu, X., Xie, L., Guan, H., Huang, Y. and Lu, X. (2015), "A shear wall element for nonlinear seismic analysis of super-tall buildings using OpenSees", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 98(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.006.
  30. Madhkhan, M. and Divan, M. (2014), "Evaluation of behavior factor of concrete precast frames with concrete precast shear wall", Amirkabir J. Civil Eng., 46(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2014.336.
  31. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  32. Nagender, T., Parulekar, Y. and Rao, G.A. (2019), "Performance evaluation and hysteretic modeling of low rise reinforced concrete shear walls", Earthq. Struct., 16(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.1.041.
  33. Nastri, E., Vergato, M. and Latour, M. (2017), "Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted RC precast industrial building", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013.
  34. NEHRP-Consultants-Joint-Venture (2010), Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  35. Nguyen, X.H. and Nguyen, H.C. (2016), "Seismic behavior of non-seismically designed reinforced concrete frame structure", Earthq. Struct., 11(2), 281-295. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.2.281.
  36. Opensees (2016), Open System for Earthquke Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of Califonia, Berkeley, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
  37. Petrini, L., Maggi, C., Priestley, M.N. and Calvi, G.M. (2008), "Experimental verification of viscous damping modeling for inelastic time history analyzes", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(S1), 125-145. http://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801925822.
  38. Rahal, K.N. (2010), "Post-cracking shear modulus of reinforced concrete membrane elements", Eng. Struct., 32(1), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.008.
  39. Rezaei, F., Madhkhan, M., Nafiyan Dehkordi, V. and Khatibi, J. (2015), "Behavior factor of semi precast rc moment resisting frames with a flexural beam-column connection", Concrete Res., 7(1), 71-82.
  40. Saad, G., Najjar, S. and Saddik, F. (2016), "Seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear wall buildings with underground stories", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 965-988. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.965.
  41. Sarkar, P., Prasad, A.M. and Menon, D. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of RC stepped building frames using improved pushover analysis", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 913-938. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.913.
  42. Siddiqui, U.A., Sucuoglu, H. and Yakut, A. (2015), "Seismic performance of gravity-load designed concrete frames infilled with low-strength masonry", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 19-35. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.019.
  43. Song, L.L. and Guo, T. (2017), "Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of self-centering prestressed concrete frames with web friction devices", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.109.
  44. Standard No. 2800 (2009), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Third Revision, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran.
  45. Talebkhah, R., Yahyaabadi, A. and Adibi, M. (2020), "Seismic behavior assessment of RC precast frame damaged in Bojnord Earthquake 2017 considering soil-structure interaction effects", Sharif J. Civil Eng., 36, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2019.51924.2436.
  46. Tang, Y. and Zhang, J. (2011), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of a slender RC shear wall considering soil-structure interaction effects", Eng. Struct., 33(1), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.011.
  47. Taylor, C.P., Thomseniv, J.H. and Wallace, J.W. (1996), "Experimental verification of displacement-based design procedures for slender rc structural walls", Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (11 WCEE), 1-8.
  48. Tian, J., Wang, Y., Jian, Z., Li, S. and Liu, Y. (2019), "Seismic performance and design method of PRC coupling beam-hybrid coupled shear wall system", Earthq. Struct., 16(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.1.083.
  49. Tsai, M.H., Zhang, J., Song, Y.P. and Lu, J.K. (2018), "Dynamic performance of a composite building structure under seismic ground motions", Earthq. Struct., 15(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.2.179.
  50. Turker, K. and Gungor, I. (2018), "Seismic performance of low and medium-rise RC buildings with wide-beam and ribbed-slab", Earthq. Struct., 15(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.4.383.
  51. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornel, C.A. (2005), "Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis", Report NO. 151, Stanford University.
  52. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
  53. Wang, Z., Pan, W. and Zhang, Z. (2020), "High-rise modular buildings with innovative precast concrete shear walls as a lateral force-resisting system", Struct., 26(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.006.
  54. Zafar, A. (2010), "Response modification factor of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames in developing countries", Master's Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  55. Zahrai, S.M., Khorraminejad, A. and Sedaghati, P. (2019), "Response modification factors of concrete bridges with different bearing conditions", Earthq. Struct., 16(2), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.2.185.