DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Over Volume: Modeling Centralization of Gastric Cancer Resections in Italy

  • Lorenzon, Laura (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) ;
  • Biondi, Alberto (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) ;
  • Agnes, Annamaria (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) ;
  • Scrima, Ottavio (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) ;
  • Persiani, Roberto (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) ;
  • D'Ugo, Domenico (General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS)
  • Received : 2021.10.02
  • Accepted : 2022.02.04
  • Published : 2022.03.31

Abstract

Background: The correlation between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes has led to the centralization of complex procedures in several countries. However, the results reported in relation to gastric cancer (GC) are contradictory. This study aimed to analyze GC surgical volumes and 30-day postoperative mortality in Italy and to provide a simulation for modeling centralization of GC resections based on district case volumes. Methods: A national registry was used to identify all GC resections, record mortality rates, and track the national in-border GC resection health travel. Hospitals were grouped according to caseload. Centralization of all GC procedures performed within the same district was modeled. The outcome measures were a minimal volume of 25 GC resections/year and the 30-day postoperative mortality. Results: In 2018, 5,873 GC resections were performed in 498 Italian hospitals (mean resections per hospital per year: 11.8); the postoperative mortality rate (5.51%) was tracked from 2016-2018. GC resection health travel ranged from 2% to 50.5%, with a significant (P<0.001) difference between northern and central/southern Italy. The mean mortality rate was 7.7% in hospitals performing one to 3 GC resections per year, compared with 4.7% in those with >17 GC resections/year (P≤0.01). Most Italian districts achieved 25 procedures/year after centralization; however, 66.3% of GC cases in southern Italy vs. 42.2% in central and 52.7% in the northern regions (P<0.001) required reallocation. Conclusion: Postoperative mortality after GC resection correlated with hospital volume. Despite health travel, most Italian districts can reach a high-volume threshold, but discrepancies in mortality rates are alarming.Trial RegistrationResearch Registry Identifierresearchregistry6869

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr. Franziska M. Lohmeyer at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS for support in revising the manuscript.

References

  1. Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg 2012;29:374-383. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343929
  2. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit. Third annual report-patient summary [Internet]. Leeds: National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit; 2012 [cited 2015 Mar 30]. Available from: https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub06xxx/pub06331/clin-audi-supp-prog-oeso-gast-2012-rep.pdf.
  3. Busweiler LA, Dikken JL, Henneman D, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Ho VK, Tollenaar RA, et al. The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: a Dutch population-based study. J Surg Oncol 2017;115:738-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24562
  4. Fischer C, Lingsma H, Klazinga N, Hardwick R, Cromwell D, Steyerberg E, et al. Volume-outcome revisited: the effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183955
  5. van Putten M, Nelen SD, Lemmens VE, Stoot JH, Hartgrink HH, Gisbertz SS, et al. Overall survival before and after centralization of gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 2018;105:1807-1815. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10931
  6. Kim EY, Song KY, Lee J. Does hospital volume really affect the surgical and oncological outcomes of gastric cancer in Korea? J Gastric Cancer 2017;17:246-254. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e31
  7. Intermedia Editore. I numeri del cancro in Italia 2020 [Internet]. Brescia: Intermedia Editore; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.aiom.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020_Numeri_Cancrooperatori-web.pdf.
  8. Amato L, Fusco D, Acampora A, Bontempi K, Rosa AC, Colais P, et al. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Epidemiol Prev 2017;41:1-128.
  9. Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (AGENAS). PNE e uno strumento di valutazione a supporto di programmi di audit clinico e organizzativo [Internet]. [place unknown]: AGENAS; 2021 [cited 2020 Sep 18]. Available from: https://pne.agenas.it/.
  10. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1364-1369. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197912203012503
  11. Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4
  12. Programma Regionale di Valutazione degli Esiti degli interventi sanitari (P.Re.Val.E.). Source title [Internet]. [place unknown]: P.Re.Val.E.; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.dep.lazio.it/prevale2020/index.php.
  13. Balzano G, Guarneri G, Pecorelli N, Paiella S, Rancoita PM, Bassi C, et al. Modelling centralization of pancreatic surgery in a nationwide analysis. Br J Surg 2020;107:1510-1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11716
  14. Dikken JL, Dassen AE, Lemmens VE, Putter H, Krijnen P, van der Geest L, et al. Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1004-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064
  15. Rutegard M, Lagergren J, Rouvelas I, Lagergren P. Surgeon volume is a poor proxy for skill in esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2009;249:256-261. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318194d1a5
  16. Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA. Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery. Ann Surg 2016;263:692-697. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001414
  17. Abdelsattar ZM, Habermann E, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Rojas RL, Blackmon SH. Understanding failure to rescue after esophagectomy in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:865-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044
  18. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966;44:166-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3348969
  19. Dikken JL, Stiekema J, van de Velde CJ, Verheij M, Cats A, Wouters MW, et al. Quality of care indicators for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:381-398. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2574-1
  20. Claassen YH, van Sandick JW, Hartgrink HH, Dikken JL, De Steur WO, van Grieken NC, et al. Association between hospital volume and quality of gastric cancer surgery in the CRITICS trial. Br J Surg 2018;105:728-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10773
  21. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS, et al. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4626-4633. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6356
  22. Cohen ME, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, Zhou L, Huffman K, Wang X, et al. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:336-46.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.027
  23. Manchon-Walsh P, Aliste L, Espinas JA, Prades J, Guarga A, Balart J, et al. Improving survival and local control in rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) in the context of centralisation: A full cycle audit assessment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.009
  24. Manchon-Walsh P, Borras JM, Espinas JA, Aliste L; Catalonian Rectal Cancer Group. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;37:325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.014
  25. Alvino DM, Chang DC, Adler JT, Noorbakhsh A, Jin G, Mullen JT. How far are patients willing to travel for gastrectomy? Ann Surg 2017;265:1172-1177. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001826