DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Feeding the Whole Crop Rice Silage on the Milking Performance of Holstein and Profitability

총체벼사일리지 급여가 Holstein 착유우의 산유성적과 수익성에 미치는 영향

  • Ji Yung, Kim (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Byung Ku, Yoon (Kangwon Province Pyeongchang Agriculture Technology Center) ;
  • Byong Wan, Kim (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kyung Il, Sung (College of Animal Life Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 김지융 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 윤병구 (강원도 평창군농업기술센터) ;
  • 김병완 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 성경일 (강원대학교 동물생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2022.12.05
  • Accepted : 2022.12.26
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of feeding the whole crop rice silage (WCRS) which partially replaces the imported grass hay crop on the milking performance of Holstein and profitability. Two experimental diets were used according to the traditional practice of dairy farms. The control diet (C) was composed of 13kg/day of mixed hay, 6.8kg/day concentrate, and orchardgrass/bermudagrass hay (1.8kg/day). The treatment diet (T) was composed of 9.6kg/day of mixed hay, 6.8kg/day of concentrate and 2.2kg/day of WCRS. The CP content of the WCRS (4.6%) was lower than orchardgrass (11.3%) and bermudagrass hay (8.4%) due to the harvest being 30days later than the optimum harvest date of rice. The lower intake was observed in T during the entire experiment period which seems to be related to the higher proportion of fiber in rice (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in milk production between C (26.9kg) and T (26.3kg) during the entire experiment period (p>0.05). Also, no difference in milk fat, milk protein, total solids, and milk composition was observed between the two diets. Higher income per head was resulted in T (21,141won) compared to C (21,915 won). These results indicate that the partial replacement of the grass hay by the WCRS can bring the profit to the dairy farm due to the no difference between the control diet and the treatment diet.

홀스타인 착유우에 수입건초 대신 WCRS로 조사료 일부를 대체 급여하였을 때 산유성적 및 수익성에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 대조구(C)는 농가 관행 급여방법으로 자가 혼합건초(13kg)와 농후사료(2.6~9.6kg), 오차드그라스 및 버뮤다그라스 건초(1.8kg)를 급여 하였고, 처리구(T)는 자가 혼합건초(9.6kg)와 농후사료(2.6~9.6kg) 및 WCRS (2.2kg)를 급여하였다. 건물수량(DMI)을 기준으로 C에 대한 T의 조사료 대체비율은 20% 였다. CP함량은 오차드그라스 및 버뮤다그라스 건초가 각각 11.3 및 8.4%였고, WCRS는 4.6%로, WCRS에서 낮았다. 이는 벼를 수확적기보다 약 30일정도 늦게 수확한 것에 기인하고 있다. DMI는 비유초기, 중기 및 후기에서 각각 T가 C보다 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다(p<0.05). 유량은 비유초기, 중기 및 후기 모두 처리간 유의적 차이는 없었다(p>0.05). 실험 기간 중 평균유량도 C 및 T가 각각 26.9 및 26.3kg으로 처리간 유의적인 차이는 없었다(p>0.05). 유지율, 유단백 및 총고형물에서 각 비유기 공히 처리 간에 유의적인 차이는 없었다(p>0.05). 두당 조수입은 C가 21,141원, T가 21,915원으로 T에서 다소 높게 나타났다. 유사비는 T가 22.9%로 C의 27.8%보다 낮았다. 이상에서 수입산 건초 대신 WCRS로 20% 대체 급여하여도 산유량 및 유성분에 유의적인 차이가 없으며 수익은 높아 경제성이 있는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 농림부 연구과제 "휴경논을 이용한 벼의 사료화 기술"의 일환으로 이루어진 것입니다. 본 논문은 의 석사논문인(이준우, 2007) "Whole Crop Rice Silage의 급여가 영양소 소화율, 젖소의 생산성 및 경제성에 미치는 영향"의 연구내용을 포함하고 있습니다.

References

  1. AOAC. 1991. Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Association of Official Analysis Chemists. Washington. D.C.
  2. Baxter, H.D., Montgomery, M.J. and Owen, J.R. 1980. Digestibility and feeding value of corn silage fed with boot stage wheat silage and alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 63:255-261. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82922-5
  3. Choi, C.W. and Oh, Y.K. 2011. Effects of feeding Whole Crop Rice Silage harvested at different mature stages on rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Hanwoo steers. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 31(2):191-200. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.191
  4. Choi, C.W., Chung, E.S., Kong S.K., Oh, Y.K., Kim, J.G. and Lee, S.C. 2010. Feed evaluation of Whole Crop Rice Silage harvested at different mature stages in Hanwoo steers using In Situ technique. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 30(2):143-150. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.2.143
  5. GAFSA. 2014. Whole crop rice silage production and feeding technical manual of forage quality. Japan Grassland Agriculture and Forage Seed Association. Japan. pp. 112-113.
  6. Goering, H.K. and Van soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture Handbook. No. 379. ARS. USDA. Washington DC.
  7. Hong, G.S. 2021. Comparative analysis on the differences in production cost and income of rice cultivation for feed. Master's thesis. Kangwon National University. Chuncheon, Korea.
  8. Ishida, M. 2001. Fermented forage rice of Kusahonami suitable for dairy cow feed. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization.
  9. JFSD. 2006. Japanese feeding standard for dairy cattle. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization. pp. 181-205.
  10. KDC. 2017. 2016 Dairy statistics yearbook. Korea Dairy Committee. Sejong. Korea. p. 260.
  11. Kenji, H., Takehiro, N., Motohiko, I., Hiroki, M. and Nobuo, Y. 2005. Feed intake, digestibility and milk production of lactating cows fed roll bale silage on forage rice "Hoshiaoba''. Journal of the Grassland Society of Japan. 51(1):48-54.
  12. Kim, B.W., Kim, G.S. and Sung, K.I. 2004. Effect of lactic acid bacteria and formic acid on the silage quality of whole crop rice at different maturity. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 24:61-70. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.1.061
  13. Kim, J.G., Kim, W.H. and Seo, S. 2006. Production and utilization technology of forage crops and whole crop rice in paddy field. Proceedings of 2006 Annual Congress of Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. pp. 59-85.
  14. Kim, J.Y., Lee, B.H., Ghassemi Nejad, J., Kim, B.W. and Sung, K.I. 2018. Comparison between observed and estimated TDN contents of whole crop rice silage from forage and food source in sheep. Annals of Animal Resource Sciences. 29:18-24. https://doi.org/10.12718/AARS.2018.29.1.18
  15. MAFRA. 2020. Activation plan of domestic forage. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Livestock Environmental Resources Division. Sejong-si. Republic of Korea.
  16. NRC. 1988. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle (6th Revised ed.). National Academy Press Washington. D.C.
  17. Ogawa, M. 2003. Research of whole crop rice silage utilization in Japan. Proceedings of 2003 International symposium of Livestock Research Institute. pp. 25-58.
  18. SAS. 2000. Statistical analysis system ver., 8.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary. NC.
  19. Sung, K.I., Hong, S.M. and Kim, B.W. 2004. Plant height, dry matter yield and forge quality at different maturity of whole crop rice. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 24:53-60. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.1.053
  20. Wardeh, M.F. 1981. Models for estimating energy and protein utilization for feeds. Ph.D. thesis. Utah, United States of America.
  21. Yasunari, Y., Masaya, M., Kiyohito, I., Shuji, U., Hiroshi, H. and Masakazu, G. 2005. Feed intake and lactation of dairy cow, fed on total mixed ration of whole rice crop silage. Journal of the Grassland Society of Japan. 51(1):40-47.
  22. Yoshida, N. 2005. Practical technique and feeding effect of whole crop rice silage in Japan. Proceedings of 2005 International Symposium of Livestock Research Institute. pp. 79-101.