DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bond behaviour at concrete-concrete interface with quantitative roughness tooth

  • Ayinde, Olawale O. (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University) ;
  • Wu, Erjun (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University) ;
  • Zhou, Guangdong (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University)
  • Received : 2022.02.20
  • Accepted : 2022.03.30
  • Published : 2022.03.25

Abstract

The roughness of substrate concrete interfaces before new concrete placement has a major effect on the interface bond behaviour. However, there are challenges associated with the consistency of the final roughness interface prepared using conventional roughness preparation methods which influences the interface bond performance. In this study, five quantitative interface roughness textures with different roughness tooth angles, depths, and tooth distribution were created to ensure consistency of interface roughness and to evaluate the bond behaviour at a precast and new concrete interface using the splitting tensile test, slant shear test, and double-shear test. In addition, smooth interface specimens and two separate the pitting interface roughness were also utilized. Obtained results indicate that the quantitative roughness has a very limited effect on the interface tensile bond strength if no extra micro-roughness or bonding agent is added at the interface. The roughness method however causes enhanced shear bond strength at the interface. Increased tooth depth improved both the tensile and shear bond strength of the interfaces, while the tooth distribution mainly influenced the shear bond strength. Major failure modes of the test specimens include interface failure, splitting cracks, and sliding failure, and are influenced by the tooth depth and tooth distribution. Furthermore, the interface properties were obtained and presented while a comparison between the different testing methods, in terms of bond strength, was performed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors specially appreciate the financial support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51978242).

References

  1. Aaleti, S. and Sritharan, S. (2019), "Quantifying Bonding Characteristics between UHPC and normal-strength concrete for bridge deck application", J. Bridge Eng., 24(6), 04019041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001404.
  2. Al-fasih, M.Y., Mohamad, M.E., Ibrahim, I.S., Ahmad, Y., Ariffin, M.A.M., Sarbini, N.N., Mohamed, R. and Kueh, A.B. (2021), "Experimental and numerical evaluations of composite concrete-to-concrete interfacial shear strength under horizontal and normal stresses", PloS One, 16(5), e0252050. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252050.
  3. Alcalde, M., Cifuentes, H. and Medina, F. (2013), "Influence of the number of keys on the shear strength of post-tensioned dry joints", Constr. Mater., 63(210), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2013.07611.
  4. Diab, A.M., Abd Elmoaty, A.E.M. and Tag Eldin, M.R. (2017), "Slant shear bond strength between self compacting concrete and old concrete", Constr. Build. Mater., 130, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.023.
  5. Espeche, A.D. and Leon, J. (2011), "Estimation of bond strength envelopes for old-to-new concrete interfaces based on a cylinder splitting test", Constr. Build. Mater., 25(3), 1222-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.032.
  6. Feng, S., Xiao, H. and Li, H. (2020), "Comparative studies of the effect of ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal concrete as repair materials on interfacial bond properties and microstructure", Eng. Struct., 222, 111122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111122.
  7. He, Y., Zhang, X., Hooton, R.D. and Zhang, X. (2017), "Effects of interface roughness and interface adhesion on new-to-old concrete bonding", Constr. Build. Mater., 151, 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.049.
  8. Hu, B., Li, Y. and Liu, Y. (2020), "Dynamic slant shear bond behavior between new and old concrete", Constr. Build. Mater., 238, 117779(1-14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117779.
  9. Hussein, H.H., Walsh, K.K., Sargand, S.M. and Steinberg, E.P. (2016), "Interfacial properties of Ultrahigh-Performance concrete and High-Strength concrete bridge connections", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 28(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001456.
  10. Julio, E.N.B.., Branco, F.A.B. and Silva, V.D. (2004), "Concrete-to-concrete bond strength. Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface", Constr. Build. Mater., 18, 675-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023.
  11. Julio, E.N.B.S., Branco, F.A.B., Silva, V.D. and Lourenco, J.F. (2006), "Influence of added concrete compressive strength on adhesion to an existing concrete substrate", Build. Envir., 41, 1934-1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.023.
  12. Luo, Q., Wang, W., Wang, B., Xu, S. and Sun, Z. (2021), "Numerical study on interface optimization of new-to-old concrete with the slant grooves", Struct., 34, 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.094.
  13. Magbool, H.M. and Tayeh, B.A. (2021), "Influence of the Roughness and Moisture of the Substrate Surface on the Bond between Old and New Concrete", Adv. Concrete Constr., 12(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2021.12.1.033.
  14. Momayez, A., Ehsani, M.R., Ramezanianpour, A.A. and Rajaie, H. (2005), "Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials", Cement Concrete Res., 35, 748-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.027.
  15. Munoz, C., Harris, D.K., Ahlborn, T.M. and Froster, D.C. (2014), "Bond performance between Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete and Normal-Strength Concrete", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 26(8), 04014031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000890.
  16. Rahal, K.N., Khaleefi, A.L. and Al-Sanee, A. (2016), "An experimental investigation of shear-transfer strength of normal and high strength self compacting concrete", Eng. Struct., 109, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.015.
  17. Santos, P.M.D., Ju, E.N.B.S. and Silva, D. (2007), "Correlation between concrete-to-concrete bond strength and the roughness of the substrate surface", Constr. Build. Mater., 21, 1688-1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.044.
  18. Santos, P.M.D. and Julio, E.N.B.S. (2013), "A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces", Constr. Build. Mater., 38, 912-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.045.
  19. Sharma, S., Ronanki, S.V., Aaleti, S. and Okumus, P. (2021), "Experimental investigation of surface preparation on normal and Ultrahigh-Performance concrete interface behavior", J. Bridge Eng., 26(4), 04019041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001697.
  20. Silfwerbrand, J., Beushausen, H. and Courard, L. (2011), Bonded Cement-Based Material Overlays for the Repair, the Lining or the Strengthening of Slabs or Pavements.
  21. Tayeh, B.A., Abu Bakar, B.H., Megat Johari, M.A. and Voo, Y.L. (2012), "Mechanical and permeability properties of the interface between normal concrete substrate and ultra high performance fiber concrete overlay", Constr. Build. Mater., 36, 538-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.013.
  22. Valikhani, A., Jahromi, A.J., Mantawy, I.M. and Azizinamini, A. (2020), "Experimental evaluation of concrete-to-UHPC bond strength with correlation to surface roughness for repair application", Constr. Build. Mater., 238, 117753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117753.
  23. Zanotti, C., Banthia, N. and Plizzari, G. (2014), "A study of some factors affecting bond in cementitious fiber reinforced repairs", Cement Concrete Res., 63, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.05.008.
  24. Zhang, Y., Zhu, P., Liao, Z. and Wang, L. (2020), "Interfacial bond properties between normal strength concrete substrate and ultra-high performance concrete as a repair material", Constr. Build. Mater., 235, 117431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117431.
  25. Zhou, X., Mickleborough, N. and Li, Z. (2005), "Shear strength of joints in precast concrete segmental bridges", ACI Struct. J., 102(1), 3-11.