산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제45권1호
  • /
  • Pages.10-19
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP 기법을 이용한 무인기 자율기능 우선순위 도출: 유무인 협업 공대공 교전을 중심으로

Deriving Priorities between Autonomous Functions of Unmanned Aircraft using AHP Analysis: Focused on MUM-T for Air to Air Combat

  • 투고 : 2021.12.03
  • 심사 : 2022.03.11
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Recently, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA) in the United States is studying a new concept of war called Mosaic Warfare, and MUM-T(Manned-Unmanned Teaming) through the division of missions between expensive manned and inexpensive unmanned aircraft is at the center. This study began with the aim of deriving the priority of autonomous functions according to the role of unmanned aerial vehicles in the present and present collaboration that is emerging along with the concept of mosaic warfare. The autonomous function of unmanned aerial vehicles between the presence and absence collaboration may vary in priority depending on the tactical operation of unmanned aerial vehicles, such as air-to-air, air-to-ground, and surveillance and reconnaissance. In this paper, ACE (Air Combat Evaluation), Skyborg, and Longshot, which are recently studied by DARPA, derive the priority of autonomous functions according to air-to-air collaboration, and use AHP analysis. The results of this study are meaningful in that it is possible to recognize the priorities of autonomous functions necessary for unmanned aircraft in order to develop unmanned aerial vehicles according to the priority of autonomous functions and to construct a roadmap for technology implementation. Furthermore, it is believed that the mass production and utilization of unmanned air vehicles will increase if one unmanned air vehicle platform with only essential functions necessary for air-to-air, air-to-air, and surveillance is developed and autonomous functions are expanded in the form of modules according to the tactical operation concept.

키워드

과제정보

This study has been supported by a Research Fund of Agency for Defense Development (UD200021JD).

참고문헌

  1. Cho, K.H. and Jung, H.J., Policy Implications of the Spread on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula, National Strategy, 2016, Vol. 22. No. 4, pp. 93-122. https://doi.org/10.35390/SEJONG.22.4.201611.004
  2. Choi, M.J., Park, G.U., Koh, D.W., and Jung, B., Study on the Selection of Excellent Air Force Budget Managers Using AHP and Probability Distribution, Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 2020, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 15~ 26. / AHP https://doi.org/10.25052/kscm.2020.10.20.2.15
  3. Forster, H., Magee, J., Kramer, J., and Uchitel S., Adatable Software Architectures and Task Synthesis for UAVs, 1st SEAS DTC Technical Conference-Edinburgh 2006. 2006.
  4. Jung, B., Oh, J., Seol, H., and Hwang, S.I., A Study on the Classification of Autonomous Functions of Unmanned Aircraft Using Delphi Method, Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 2021, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 55-67. https://doi.org/10.25052/KSCM.2021.05.21.1.55
  5. Jung, B., Oh, J., Seol, H., and Hwang, S.I., A Derived on the Autonomous Function of Manned-Unmanned Aircraft for Collaboration, Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2021, Seoul, Korea, p. 19.
  6. Jung, B., Yoo, S., Hong, H., Oh, J., and Seol, H., A Study on the Autonomous Function of Unmanned Aircraft for MUM-T, KASA Fall Conference, 2021, Jeju, Korea, pp. 40.
  7. Jung, S. W. and Shim, H. C., A.I. of Self Driving Cars, Journal of the KSME, 2017, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 42-45.
  8. Kang, J., Theory and practice of AHP, Inter-Vision Inc, 2008, pp. 12-13.
  9. Kim, H., Rational management and decision making, Han-Ti Media Inc, 2017.
  10. Kim, J.K., A review on the development trends and prospects of unmanned fighter jets; Centered on Air-to-Air Unmanned Fighter, Weekly Defense Discussion 1591, 2015, pp. 15-44.
  11. Kim, S.B., Suh, B.S., and Park, S. H., The Future of the Operation Concept of Unmanned Fighter in the Case of X-47, Weekly Defense Discussion 1545, 2014, pp. 14-50.
  12. Kuan, J., Strategic decision making technique: AHP. Chung-Ram Inc, 2012.
  13. Lee, S., Marketing decision making using AHP technique, Suck-Jung Inc, 1994, pp. 132-134.
  14. Park, Y., Decision making by AHP. Kyo-Woo Inc, 2009.
  15. US Army UAS Center of Excellence., US Army Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems 2010-2035, US Army, 2010.
  16. US Office of the Secretary of Defense., Unmanned Aircrafty System Roadmap 2005-2030, US Department of Defence, 2005.
  17. Yun, S.Y. and Park, S.J., A study of foreign military UAV development trend and operational cases for the UAV developments of Republic of Korea Armed Forces, The Journal of Strategy Studies, 2018, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 205-232.