DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Preliminary Study for Revision of KORMARC Bibliographic Format

KORMARC 통합서지용 개정을 위한 기초연구

  • 노지현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이미화 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과 및 학교도서관연구소)
  • Received : 2022.02.23
  • Accepted : 2022.03.11
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

This study aims to present a revised draft of KORMARC bibliographic format that was first revised in 2014. To this end, data collection and analysis methods are as follows. First, the opinions of cataloging working groups for revision of KORMARC including the National Library of Korea (NLK) and KERIS were collected and analyzed. Second, work guidelines used in libraries or cooperative catalog systems were analyzed. Third, by comparing MARC21 update No.32 (June 2021) with the KORMARC bibliographic format, elements that need to be reflected in the KORMARC revision were derived. Finally, issues that have been raised in previous studies or that require further discussion were examined. Based on these analysis results, an outlines of the extension and deletion of KORMARC fields, subfields, and indicators, and supplementation of application guidelines and examples were derived. The final revision directions were finalized after collecting expert opinions, the working group reviews, and comprehensive opinions from the library community.

이 연구는 「KORMARC 통합서지용」 (2014)에 대한 개정(안)의 도출을 위한 기초연구이다. 연구의 주요 내용과 방법은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2015-2021년에 국립중앙도서관에 접수된 「KORMARC 통합서지용」의 문제점과 개정에 대한 실무진의 의견을 수집하여 분석하였다. 둘째, KORMARC 적용과 관련된 기관별 업무지침을 분석하여 KORMARC 개정에 반영할 사항을 도출하였다. 셋째, MARC21의 Update No. 32(June 2021)와 「KORMARC 통합서지용」을 비교하여 KORMARC 개정에 반영할 사항을 도출하였다. 마지막으로, 그동안 선행연구에서 제기해 왔거나 별도 논의가 필요하다고 판단한 쟁점을 조사하였다. 분석결과에근거하여, 이 연구에서는 KORMARC 필드·식별기호·지시기호의 추가와 삭제, 적용지침과 예시의 보완, 부록 및 부속서(부호표)의 개정을 포함하는 개정 초안을 도출하고, 이에 대한 전문가 의견 수렴과 국립중앙도서관 국가서지과 실무진의 검토, 공청회를 통한 도서관계의 폭넓은 의견 수렴 과정을 거쳐 최종 개정(안)을 마련하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. KERIS (2016). KERIS Bibliographic Formats and Standards. Available: http://unicat.riss.kr/cmarc_guideline/main.jsp
  2. KERIS. Data Input Guidelines of KORMARC by Resource Type. Available: http://unicat.riss.kr/mattypeNew_guideline/subIntro.jsp
  3. Lee, Kyungho (2009). A study on the improvement plan of 245 field in KORMARC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(1), 181-207. DOI: 10.16981/kliss.40.1.200903.181
  4. Lee, Kyungho (2014). A study for grouping works in KORMARC database based on RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1), 149-171. DOI: 10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.149
  5. Lee, Kyungho & Kim, Jeonghyen (2006). A study on the characteristics and problems of an integrated KORMARC bibliographic formats. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(4), 201-223.
  6. Lee, Mihwa (2010). A study on suggestion for KCR and KORMARC by analyzing work and expression element of RDA in MARC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 251-272. DOI: 10.16981/kliss.41.2.201006.251
  7. National Library of Korea (2020. 10). Cataloging Guidelines of National Bibliography Division.
  8. National Library of Korea (2014). Korean Machine Readable Cataloging Format: Integrated Format for Bibliographic Data. Available: https://librarian.nl.go.kr/kormarc/kormarc_2014/index.html
  9. Rho, Jee-Hyun & Lee, Eun Ju (2018). Current status of holdings data in Korean libraries and proposal for revision of KORMARC format for holdings data. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 93-117. DOI: 10.16981/kliss.49.4.201812.93
  10. Rho, Jee-Hyun & Lee, Mihwa (2014). A study on the revision of KORMARC-Authority format by reflecting the international trends of authority control. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(1), 61-84. DOI: 10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.061
  11. Library of Congress (2021). MARC21 format for bibliographic data. Available: https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/