References
- Aschenbrenner, Balota, Weigand, Scaltritti, & Besner (2017). The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 700-718. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000342
- Benoni, H., & Tsal, Y. (2013). Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00522
- Burnham, B. R. (2010). Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Acta Psychologica, 135, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.003
- Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.5.472
- Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
- Cosman, J. D., Mordkoff, J. T., & Vecera, S. P. (2016). Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 2077-2083. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000278
- Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039515
- Egeth, H. E., & Santee, J. E. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of inter letter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 506-517. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.7.3.506
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effect of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
- Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198804
- Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2007). High perceptual load makes everybody equal. Psychological Science, 18, 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01908.x
- Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73
- Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.8.6.875
- Kwak, H. W., Kim, J. O., & Park, M. K. (1993). Time courses of the negative and positive repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 814-829. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.814
- Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451
- Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
- Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current directions in psychological science, 19, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410370295
- Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00432.x
- Lavie, M., & de Fockert, J. W. (2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 202-212. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194795
- Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038-1052. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1038
- Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
- Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213897
- Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory -Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23, 1316-1340. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5
- Park, C. (2008). The influence of uniform connectedness and report task type on the perception of brief displays. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 39-54.
- Park, C. (2012). Review of Negative/Positive Repetition Effect in Visual Information Processing. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 24, 191-209. https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.2.006
- Park, C. (2013). The Influence of Unattended Distractors on the Identification of Targets. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 24, 365-391. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2013.24.4.004
- Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.8.4.489
- Tsal, Y., & Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: Perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1645-1656. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018172
- Weissman, D. H., Drake, B., Colella, K., & Samuel, D. (2018). Perceptual load is not always a crucial determinant of early versus late selection. Acta Psychologica, 185, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.004