Korea Journal of Hospital Management (한국병원경영학회지)

Korean Society of Hospital Management (한국병원경영학회)
권호 표지

the Association between the Single-Person Household & Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood and Recommendation to Refrain Drinking Alcohol, Counseling for Drinking Problems

독거가구 및 기초생활수급 여부와 절주권고, 음주문제 상담 간의 연관성 분석

  • Jeong-Min, Yang (Institute for Digital Life Convergence, Dankook University) ;
  • Ha-Eeun, Kim (Institute for Digital Life Convergence, Dankook University) ;
  • Jae-Hyun, Kim (Institute for Digital Life Convergence, Dankook University)
  • 양정민 (단국대학교 디지털라이프융합연구소) ;
  • 김하은 (단국대학교 디지털라이프융합연구소) ;
  • 김재현 (단국대학교 디지털라이프융합연구소)
  • Received : 2022.09.27
  • Accepted : 2022.12.15
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between single-person households & Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood and recommendation on alcohol consumption, and counseling on drinking problems for adults 19 years of age or older. Methods: In this study, excluding missing values, the association between the single-person household & Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood and recommendation to refrain drinking alcohol, counseling for drinking problems was analyzed by using the chi-squre test and logistic regression analysis. Results: In the case of non-single person households, compared to single-person households, the recommendation rate to refrain drinking alcohol was 1.519 OR (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.159 , p-value <.0001). meanwhile, in the case of Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood, the recommendation rate to refrain alcohol consumption was higher by 1.414 OR (OR: 1.414, p-value: 0.011), and the drinking problem counseling rate was also higher by 2.257 OR (OR: 2.257, p-value: 0.026) compared to non-beneficiary group. Discussion & Conclusion: Based on the 2016-2019 National Health and Nutrition Survey, this study investigated the associaiton between single households & Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood and recommendations to refrain alcohol, and counseling on drinking problems. Compared to the Beneficiary of National Basic Livelihood group, single-person household group has recently been classified as a socially vulnerable group, but it is not applicable in the policy category. If policy and institutional measures for treatment are provided, it is expected that the problem of alcohol abuse can be reduced.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea, Social Indicators in Korea 2021. 2021. 
  2. Ministry of Government Legislation, Reorganization of legislation to protect the rights of the socially vulnerable and establish a support system. 2012. 
  3. Moon JH and Kang MA, among the Elderly Living Alone in Korea: An Application of the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations, Health and Social Welfare Review, 2016. 36(2): pp.480-510.  https://doi.org/10.15709/HSWR.2016.36.2.480
  4. Lee MJ, Choi YJ, and Lee SS, An Exploratory Study of the Characteristics of One-Person Household and Its Social Implication. Journal of Social Science, 2014. 27(1). 
  5. Statistics Korea, Population and Housing Census. 2020. 
  6. Kim SG and Ryu CS, A study on the safety issues and improvement measures of a socially vulnerable group. The Korea Institute of Public Administration, 2015. 0(2015): p. 1-171. 
  7. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Status of Recipients of National Basic Living Security. KOSIS, 2021. 
  8. Shin SJ, Leisure, Tourism Meaning and Constraints of the socially Vulnerable : Focusing on Participants in Welfare Tourism Projects. Kyonggi University Master's Thesis, 2007: p. 1-101. 
  9. Kim SH, et al., Measures to improve laws/systems for supporting cultural activities of socially vulnerable groups. Korea Culture & Tourism Institute, 2005. 
  10. Williams, C.C. and R. White, Conceptualising social inclusion: some lessons for action. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, 2003. 156(2): p. 91-95.  https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2003.156.2.91
  11. Choi JH, et al., A Study about the Function of Culture Welfare Programs for Dissolving Social Exclusion about the Social Vulnerable Classes: A Qualitative Research Focused on the Culture Welfare Practitioners. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 2010. 62(1): p. 291-316.  https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2010.62.1.012
  12. Collins, S.E., Associations Between Socioeconomic Factors and Alcohol Outcomes. Alcohol research : current reviews, 2016. 38(1): p. 83-94. 
  13. Probst, C., et al., Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-attributable mortality compared with all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol, 2014. 43(4): p. 1314-27.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu043
  14. Do EY and Hong YR, Factors Affecting the Problem Drinking of Public Aid Recipients. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2014. 14(9): p. 371-380.  https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.09.371
  15. Jung MC, et al., Analysis of Drinking Behavior According to Household Type: Using Data from the 6th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Korean Journal of Family Practice, 2019. 9(3): p. 254-259.  https://doi.org/10.21215/kjfp.2019.9.3.254
  16. World Health Organization (WHO), Global strategy to reduce the harmful use of alcohol. 2010. 
  17. Chang HJ, Shim JS, and Park JA, Study on the Recognition and Behavioral Intention for Alcohol-reduction Programs. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 2004. 21(1): p. 243-257. 
  18. Korea Health Promotion Institution, 2021 alcohol statistics collection. 2021. 
  19. SHIN MA, Comparative Study on Health Behavior and Mental Health between One person and Multi-person Households : Analysis of Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys(2013, 2015, 2017). Journal of Wellness (KSW), 2019. 14(4): p. 11-23. 
  20. Nam EJ and Lee JE, Effects of Household Type on Blood Pressure, Body Mass Index, Mini Nutritional Assessment Score, and Biochemical Indicators in Elderly Individuals Living Alone and with Families. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Home Health Care Nursing, 2019. 26(2): p. 210-218.  https://doi.org/10.22705/JKASHCN.2019.26.2.210
  21. Kim YS, The Study of the Impact of the Family Type on the Health Promoting Behavior and Physical and Mental Health of Elderly People. Health and Social Welfare Review, 2014. 34(3): p. 400-429.  https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2014.34.3.400
  22. KOSIS, Suwon City Social Survey. 2021. 
  23. Lee YP, A comparative study on the mental health characteristics, subjective quality of life, and service needs of recipients of basic livelihood security for alcoholism and general recipients- Focusing on those subject to rehabilitation programs for self-support projects. The Journal of Korean Alcohol Science, 2001. 2(2): p. 5-12. 
  24. Choi EJ, et al., Development of a Community Based Alcohol induced harm Prevention Model. National Research Center for Mental Health Education, 2007. 
  25. Choi JS, Ha KH, and Lee SR, A study on establishing a support system for the prevention of alcoholism for the poor in Gyeonggi-do. Gyeonggi Welfare Foundation, 2015. 
  26. Jung YH, et al., A study on strategies to reduce alcohol consumption to prevent the harmful effects of drinking. Korea Institute for Health and Affairs, 2014. 
  27. Ministry of Health and Welfare and Korea Health Promotion Institution, 2020 Community Integrated Health Promotion Project: Prevention of the harmful effects of drinking. 2020. 
  28. Do EY and Hong YR, Factors Affecting the Problem Drinking of Public Aid Recipients. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 2014. 14(9). 
  29. Lee YB, One-person Households and Their Policy Implications, 2017. 2017(252): p. 10.