DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Employment Creation Center considering Spatial Autocorrelation: A Case of Changwon City

공간자기상관을 고려한 고용창출중심지 추정: 창원시 사례를 중심으로

  • 정하영 (경남대학교 프로네시스융합학부 빅데이터융합공학전공) ;
  • 이태헌 (동국대학교 인구와사회협동연구소) ;
  • 황인식 (창원시정연구원 도시공간연구실)
  • Received : 2022.01.14
  • Accepted : 2022.03.02
  • Published : 2022.03.31

Abstract

In the era of low growth, many provincial cities are experiencing population decline and aging. Population decline phenomena such as reduction of productive manpower, reduction of finances, deterioration of quality of life, and collapse of the community base are occurring in a chain and are being pushed to the brink of extinction of the cities. This study aims to propose a methodology to objectively estimate the employment creation centers and setting the basic unit of industrial-centered zoning by applying spatial statistical techniques and GIS for the application of the compact city plan as an efficient spatial management policy in a city with a declining population. In details, based on reviewing previous studies on compact city, 'employment complex index(ECI)' were defined considering the number of workers, the number of settlers, and the area of development land, the employment creation center was estimated by applying the 'Local Moran's I' and 'Getis-Ord's Hot-Spot Analysis'. As a case study, changes in the four years of 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 were compared and analyzed for Changwon City. As a result, it was confirmed that the employment creation center is becoming compacted and polycentric, which is a significant result that reflects the actual situation well. This results provide the basic data for functional and institutional territorial governance for the regional revitalization platform, and provide meaningful information necessary for spatial policy decision-making, such as population reduction, regional gross domestic product, and public facility arrangement that can respond to energy savings, transportation plans, and medical and health plans.

저성장·고령화시대에 접어들면서 지방의 많은 도시들이 인구감소문제를 경험하고 있다. 생산인 력감소, 재정감축, 삶의 질 저하, 공동체 기반 붕괴 등 다양한 형태의 쇠퇴현상들이 연쇄적으로 발생하면서 지방소멸의 벼랑 끝으로 몰리고 있다. 본 연구는 저성장·고령화 시대 인구감소도시의 효율적인 공간관리 정책으로써 컴팩시티 계획을 적용하기 위해 공간통계기법과 GIS를 활용하여 도시 내 고용창출중심지 추정과 고용 권역을 설정하는 방법론을 제안하였다. 구체적으로 컴팩시티에 관한 선행연구 검토를 통하여 종사자수, 정주인구수, 개발용지 면적을 고려한 새로운 지표 '고용복합지수'를 정의하고, 국지적 모란지수와 핫스팟 분석을 적용하여 고용창출중심지를 추정하였다. 창원시를 대상으로 2013년, 2015년, 2017년, 2019년의 4개 년도를 사례분석을 실시하여 고용창출중심지의 압축된 다핵구조를 확인하였다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 지속적 도시 성장을 위한 산업중심 권역 설정과 컴팩시티 공간정책의 시사점을 제시하였다. 본 분석 결과는 지역활성화 플랫폼을 위한 기능적·제도적 권역 거버넌스의 기초자료로써 인구감소, 지역총생산, 에너지 절감에 대응할 수 있는 공공시설배치, 교통계획, 의료보건 계획 등 공간정책 의사 결정에 필요한 유의미한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 창원시정연구원의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis. 27(2):93-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
  2. Changwon. 2016. 2025 Changwon City Urban Regeneration Strategic. pp.1-88.
  3. Chea, H.W. and Shin, J.Y. 2015. Exploration of changes in social diversity in Seoul metropolitan region. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers 4(1):139-154. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.4.1.9
  4. Cutsinger, J., Galster, G., Wolman, H., Harson, R and Towns, D. 2004, Verifying the multi-dimensional nature of metropolitan land use: Advancing the understanding and measurement of sprawl. Journal of Urban Affairs. 27(3):235-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00235.x
  5. European Parliament. 2015. Territorial Governance and Cohesion Policy. 48pp.
  6. Ewing, R., Pendall, R., Chen, D. 2002. Measuring sprawl and its impact. Smart Growth America, pp.1-31.
  7. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M., Wolman, H., Coleman, S and Freihage, J. 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate 12:681-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
  8. Getis, A., and Ord, J.K. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(July): 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
  9. Hwang, U.J. and Woo, M.G. 2016. Analysis of urban sprawl types and their characteristics through measuring urban sprawl in South Korea. Journal of Korea Planning Association 51(5):21-42. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2016.10.51.5.21
  10. Jang, M.H. 2016. Analysis on the characteristics of urban decline using GIS and spatial statistical method: the case of Gwangju metropolitan city. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers 22(2): 424-438.
  11. Jeong, Y.H. and Lee, J.H., 2013. Study on current status and prospects of compact city policies in Korea, Anyang. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. pp.1-166.
  12. Jeong, H.Y. and Lee, T.H. 2021. A study on estimation of the center of a polycentric city: A case of Changwon city. The Korean Association for Local Government Studies, Proceeding 1005-1014.
  13. Kang, H.J. 2008. Hot spot analysis: fundamentals of spatial analysis, understanding and utilization of recent cluster analysis and local moran index, Planning and Policy, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, pp.116-121.
  14. Kim, H.S. 2020. The city center is now a CRD rather than a CBD [Hyunsu Kim M etropolis 2030]. https://www.sisajournal.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=203419.
  15. Kim, J.I., Hwang, K.W., Chung, H.W. and Yeo, C.H. 2004. Urban growth analysis through satellite image and zonal data. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 7(3):1-12.
  16. Kim, J.I. and Kwon, J.H. 2009. Identifying urban spatial structure throught GIS and remote sensing data. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 12(2):44-51.
  17. Ko, E.J. and Ahn, K.H. 2014. Effects of neighborhood environment on social diversity: Focused on Seoul. Seoul Studies 15(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.15.1.201403.1
  18. KOSTAT. 2021. Provisional results of birth and death statistics in 2020. Demographic Trends Department. pp.1-46.
  19. Lee, S.I., Cho, D.H. and Lee, M.P. 2016. Comparing univariate spatial association statistics(II): Focusing on local Lee's Si statistics. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers 5(3):375-396. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.5.3.12
  20. Litynski and Serafin.(2021). Polynuclearity as a spatial measure of urban sprawl: testing the percentiles approach, Land, 10, 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070732
  21. Long, U., Song, Y. and Chen, L. 2021. Identifying subcenters with a nonparametric method and ubiquitous point-ofinterest data: A case study of 294 Chinese cities. Urban Analytics and City Science 0(0):1-18.
  22. Makihara, I. 2019. Prospects of Japanese local government reform in 2040, Prospects of the Korean Society of Local Government Conference 2019. 11:.663-678.
  23. Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, Oxford University Press on behalf of Biometrika Trust 37(1/2):17-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
  24. Moon, T.H. 2005. Fractal analysis of urban morphology considering distributed situation of buildings. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 8(3):1-10.
  25. Namm K. and Lim, U. 2009. Identification of employment and population sub-centers in Seoul and their relationship using non-parametric methods. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 63:91-106. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2009.63..005
  26. Nongmin. 2021. 89 local governments on the verge of extinction of'population decline'... Hometown tax is a solution, 2021-10-21.
  27. OECD. 2018. Rethinking urban sprawl: moving towards sustainable cities, OECD.
  28. Ord, J.K. and Getis, A. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis. Ohio State University Press 27(4):286-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
  29. Park, E.J. and Lim, M.H. 2020. Analysis of the characteristics of vacant house hotspot areas in Jeonju, Housing Studies Review 28(2):131-150.
  30. Park, J.O., Choi, I.S. and Na, M.H. 2016. A study on the effects of air pollution on circulatory health using spatial data, Journal of Korean Society for Quality Managment 44(3):677-688. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.3.677
  31. Sohn, J.Y. 2011. Analysis on urban water use using Moran and local Moran indices for spatial pattern and its change: A case study of the counties in the U.S. Southeast. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 27(2):77-97.
  32. Tsai, Y. H. 2005. Quantifying urban form: compactness versus sprawl urban studies, 42:141-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000309748
  33. Torrens, P.M. and Alberti, M. 2000. Measuring sprawl. CASA Working Papers 27. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis UCL. London, UK. pp.1-32.
  34. Yi, M.S. and Yeo, K.H. 2021. An analysis on the spatial pattern of local safety level index using spatial autocorrelation: Focused on basic local governments, Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography 39(1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.7848/KSGPC.2021.39.1.29
  35. Yim, S.H. and Songm J.Y. 2020. An analysis of consolidation effects of Masan, Changwon, and Jinhae: Focusing on urban growth and balanced development. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 55(3):289-312. https://doi.org/10.22776/KGS.2020.55.3.289
  36. Yoon, E.J., Lee, D. K., Kim, H.G. and Choi, K.L. 2016. Vulnerable homogeneous hotspot areas of the industrial sector for the climate change: Focused on mitigation and adaptation perspective. Journal of Climate Change Research 7(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2016.7.1.69