대한수의학회지 (Korean Journal of Veterinary Research)

  • 제62권1호
  • /
  • Pages.8.1-8.6
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2466-1384(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1392(eISSN)
대한수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Image quality assessments of focal spot size on radiographic images in dogs

  • Park, Sujin (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Animal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hwang, Tae Sung (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Animal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hee Chun (Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Animal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.18
  • 심사 : 2022.02.14
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effects of focal spot size of X-ray tube on sharpness of clinical radiographic images of dogs and cats. Radiographic images of 24 stifle joints, 15 carpi, 18 lumbar spines, 61 thoraxes, and 47 abdomens of 102 dogs and 4 cats were obtained in the present study, using 2 X-ray tubes with nominal focal spots of 2.0 mm and 0.6 mm, respectively. The sharpness of specific anatomical structures in all the images of 5 projections was assessed. The radiographic sharpness of various anatomical structures of lumbar spine and cortex of stifle with fine focal spot was increased significantly compared with broad focal spot images. In addition, the blurred motion was significantly higher in the fine focal spot images of thorax. In conclusion, our study suggests that a selective use of fine foci for imaging of lumbar spine or cortex of stifle enhanced radiographic sharpness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Williams MB, Krupinski EA, Strauss KJ, Breeden WK 3rd, Rzeszotarski MS, Applegate K, Wyatt M, Bjork S, Seibert JA. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4:371-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.002
  2. Thrall DE, Widmer WR. Radiation Protection and Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. In: Thrall DE, ed. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. 6th ed. pp. 2-21, Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, 2013.
  3. Robertson ID, Thrall DE. Digital Radiographic Imaging. In: Thrall DE, ed. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. 6th ed. pp. 22-37, Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, 2013.
  4. Gorham S, Brennan PC. Impact of focal spot size on radiologic image quality: a visual grading analysis. Radiography 2010; 16:304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2010.02.007
  5. Kopans DB. Mammography: Equipment and Basic Physics. In: Kopans DB, ed. Breast Imaging. 3rd ed. pp. 243-266, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2007.
  6. Huda W, Steinbach BG, Geiser WR, Belden CJ. Optimal technique factors for magnification mammography. Invest Radiol 1997;32:378-381. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199707000-00002
  7. Huda W, Abrahams RB. X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:W393-W397. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13126
  8. Curry TS. Production of X Rays. In: Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC, eds. Christensen's Physics of Diagnostic Radiology. 4th ed. pp. 10-35, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 1990.
  9. Auton T, Bishop R, Haliczenko K, Hurley M, Madden S, Rose B, Hart R. Edge sharpness as a function of depth in plain film radiography. Radiographer 2005;52:13-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-3909.2005.tb00035.x
  10. Zink FE. X-ray tubes. Radiographics 1997;17:1259-1268. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.17.5.9308113
  11. Grabska I, Fabiszewska E, Pasicz K, Skrzynski W. Estimation of the effective focal spot sizes in medical diagnostic X-ray tube assemblies. Pol J Med Phys Eng 2016;22:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjmpe-2016-0006
  12. Korstjens CM, Spruijt RJ, Geraets WG, Mosekilde L, van der Stelt PF. Reliability of an image analysis system for quantifying the radiographic trabecular pattern. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:230-234. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.563669
  13. Katz MC, Nickoloff EL. Radiographic detail and variation of the nominal focal spot size: the "focal effect". Radiographics 1992;12:753-761. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.4.1636037
  14. Muntz EP, Logan WW. Focal spot size and scatter suppression in magnification mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;133:453-459. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.133.3.453
  15. Goh YP, Lau KK, Low K, Buchan K, Oh LC, Kuganesan A, Huynh M. Fine focal spot size improves image quality in computed tomography abdomen and pelvis. Eur Radiol 2016;26:4545-4550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4313-7
  16. Thrall DE. Principles of Radiographic Interpretation of the Abdomen. In: Thrall DE, ed. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. 7th ed. pp. 754-763, Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, 2017.
  17. Thrall D. Principles of Radiographic Interpretation of the Thorax. In: Thrall DE, ed. Textbook of Veterinary Diagnostic Radiology. 6th ed. pp. 474-488, Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis, 2013.