DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Electron Transfer to Hydroxylase through Component Interactions in Soluble Methane Monooxygenase

  • Lee, Chaemin (Department of Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Hwang, Yunha (Department of Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyun Goo (Department of Neurology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University and Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Seung Jae (Department of Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.24
  • 심사 : 2022.02.03
  • 발행 : 2022.03.28

초록

The hydroxylation of methane (CH4) is crucial to the field of environmental microbiology, owing to the heat capacity of methane, which is much higher than that of carbon dioxide (CO2). Soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO), a member of the bacterial multicomponent monooxygenase (BMM) superfamily, is essential for the hydroxylation of specific substrates, including hydroxylase (MMOH), regulatory component (MMOB), and reductase (MMOR). The diiron active site positioned in the MMOH α-subunit is reduced through the interaction of MMOR in the catalytic cycle. The electron transfer pathway, however, is not yet fully understood due to the absence of complex structures with reductases. A type II methanotroph, Methylosinus sporium 5, successfully expressed sMMO and hydroxylase, which were purified for the study of the mechanisms. Studies on the MMOH-MMOB interaction have demonstrated that Tyr76 and Trp78 induce hydrophobic interactions through π-π stacking. Structural analysis and sequencing of the ferredoxin domain in MMOR (MMOR-Fd) suggested that Tyr93 and Tyr95 could be key residues for electron transfer. Mutational studies of these residues have shown that the concentrations of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and iron ions are changed. The measurements of dissociation constants (Kds) between hydroxylase and mutated reductases confirmed that the binding affinities were not significantly changed, although the specific enzyme activities were significantly reduced by MMOR-Y93A. This result shows that Tyr93 could be a crucial residue for the electron transfer route at the interface between hydroxylase and reductase.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by grants from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1A6A1A03015876 and 2020R1I1A3072574). This paper was supported by the Fund of Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital.

참고문헌

  1. Balasubramanian R, Rosenzweig AC. 2007. Structural and mechanistic insights into methane oxidation by particulate methane monooxygenase. Acct. Chem. Res. 40: 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar700004s
  2. Hakemian AS, Rosenzweig AC. 2007. The biochemistry of methane oxidation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76: 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061505.175355
  3. Hanson RS, Hanson TE. 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60: 439-471. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996
  4. Stainthorpe AC, Lees V, Salmond GPC, Dalton H, Murrell JC. 1990. The Methane monooxygenase gene cluster of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Gene 91: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(90)90158-N
  5. Ward N, Larsen O, Sakwa J, Bruseth L, Khouri H, Durkin AS, et al. 2004. Genomic insights into methanotrophy: The complete genome sequence of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). PLoS Biol. 2: e303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020303
  6. Lee C, Ha SC, Rao Z, Hwang Y, Kim DS, Kim SY, et al. 2021. Elucidation of the electron transfer environment in the MMOR FAD-binding domain from Methylosinus sporium 5. Dalton Trans. 50: 16493-16498. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1DT03273A
  7. Amaral JA, Knowles R. 1995. Growth of methanotrophs in methane and oxygen counter gradients. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 126: 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(95)00012-T
  8. Balasubramanian R, Smith SM, Rawat S, Yatsunyk LA, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. 2010. Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre. Nature 465: 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08992
  9. Choi DW, Kunz RC, Boyd ES, Semrau JD, Antholine WE, Han JI, et al. 2003. The membrane-associated methane monooxygenase (pMMO) and pMMO-NADH : quinone oxidoreductase complex from Methylococcus capsulatus Bath. J. Bacteriol. 185: 5755-5764. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.19.5755-5764.2003
  10. Wang VC, Maji S, Chen PP, Lee HK, Yu SS, Chan SI. 2017. Alkane oxidation: methane monooxygenases, related enzymes, and their biomimetics. Chem. Rev. 117: 8574-8621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00624
  11. Leahy JG, Batchelor PJ, Morcomb SM. 2003. Evolution of the soluble diiron monooxygenases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27: 449-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00023-8
  12. Lee SY, Lipscomb JD. 1999. Oxygen activation catalyzed by methane monooxygenase hydroxylase component: proton delivery during the O-O bond cleavage steps. Biochemistry 38: 4423-4432. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi982712w
  13. Lieberman RL, Rosenzweig AC. 2004. Biological methane oxidation: regulation, biochemistry, and active site structure of particulate methane monooxygenase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. 39: 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409230490475507
  14. Merkx M, Kopp DA, Sazinsky MH, Blazyk JL, Muller J, Lippard SJ. 2001. Dioxygen activation and methane hydroxylation by soluble methane monooxygenase: a tale of two irons and three proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40: 2782-2807. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010803)40:15<2782::AID-ANIE2782>3.0.CO;2-P
  15. Sullivan JP, Dickinson D, Chase HA. 1998. Methanotrophs, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, sMMO, and their application to bioremediation. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 24: 335-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408419891294217
  16. Baik MH, Newcomb M, Friesner RA, Lippard SJ. 2003. Mechanistic studies on the hydroxylation of methane by methane monooxygenase. Chem. Rev. 103: 2385-2419. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr950244f
  17. Elango N, Radhakrishnan R, Froland WA, Wallar BJ, Earhart CA, Lipscomb JD, et al. 1997. Crystal structure of the hydroxylase component of methane monooxygenase from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Protein Sci. 6: 556-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560060305
  18. Rosenzweig AC, Frederick CA, Lippard SJ, Nordlund P. 1993. Crystal structure of a bacterial nonheme iron hydroxylase that catalyzes the biological oxidation of methane. Nature 366: 537-543. https://doi.org/10.1038/366537a0
  19. Wallar BJ, Lipscomb JD. 1996. Dioxygen activation by enzymes containing binuclear non-heme iron clusters. Chem. Rev. 96: 2625-2657. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9500489
  20. Lee SJ, McCormick MS, Lippard SJ, Cho US. 2013. Control of substrate access to the active site in methane monooxygenase. Nature 494: 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11880
  21. Kim H, An S, Park YR, Jang H, Yoo H, Park SH, et al. 2019. MMOD-induced structural changes of hydroxylase in soluble methane monooxygenase. Sci. Adv. 5: eaax0059. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0059
  22. Blazyk JL, Gassner GT, Lippard SJ. 2005. Intermolecular electron-transfer reactions in soluble methane monooxygenase: a role for hysteresis in protein function. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127: 17364-17376. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0554054
  23. Brandstetter H, Whittington DA, Lippard SJ, Frederick CA. 1999. Mutational and structural analyses of the regulatory protein B of soluble methane monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Chem. Biol. 6: 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80062-3
  24. Chang SL, Wallar BJ, Lipscomb JD, Mayo KH. 1999. Solution structure of component B from methane monooxygenase derived through heteronuclear NMR and molecular modeling. Biochemistry 38: 5799-5812. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi982992f
  25. Chang SL, Wallar BJ, Lipscomb JD, Mayo KH. 2001. Residues in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b methane monooxygenase component B involved in molecular interactions with reduced- and oxidized-hydroxylase component: a role for the N-terminus. Biochemistry 40: 9539-9551. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0103462
  26. Liu Y, Nesheim JC, Lee SK, Lipscomb JD. 1995. Gating effects of component B on oxygen activation by the methane monooxygenase hydroxylase component. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 24662-24665. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.42.24662
  27. Sazinsky MH, Lippard SJ. 2005. Product bound structures of the soluble methane monooxygenase hydroxylase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath): protein motion in the α-subunit. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127: 5814-5825. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja044099b
  28. Walters KJ, Gassner GT, Lippard SJ, Wagner G. 1999. Structure of the soluble methane monooxygenase regulatory protein B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 7877-7882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.14.7877
  29. Wang WX, Lippard SJ. 2014. Diiron oxidation state control of substrate access to the active site of soluble methane monooxygenase mediated by the regulatory component. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136: 2244-2247. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja412351b
  30. Chatwood LL, Muller J, Gross JD, Wagner G, Lippard SJ. 2004. NMR structure of the flavin domain from soluble methane monooxygenase reductase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Biochemistry 43: 11983-11991. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi049066n
  31. Gassner GT, Lippard SJ. 1999. Component interactions in the soluble methane monooxygenase system from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Biochemistry 38: 12768-12785. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi990841m
  32. Kopp DA, Gassner GT, Blazyk JL, Lippard SJ. 2001. Electron-transfer reactions of the reductase component of soluble methane monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Biochemistry 40: 14932-14941. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi015556t
  33. Liu Y, Nesheim JC, Paulsen KE, Stankovich MT, Lipscomb JD. 1997. Roles of the methane monooxygenase reductase component in the regulation of catalysis. Biochemistry 36: 5223-5233. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi962743w
  34. Muller J, Lugovskoy AA, Wagner G, Lippard SJ. 2002. NMR structure of the [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin domain from soluble methane monooxygenase reductase and interaction with its hydroxylase. Biochemistry 41: 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi015668k
  35. Banerjee R, Proshlyakov Y, Lipscomb JD, Proshlyakov DA. 2015. Structure of the key species in the enzymatic oxidation of methane to methanol. Nature 518: 431-434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14160
  36. Cutsail GE 3rd, Banerjee R, Zhou A, Que L Jr., Lipscomb JD, DeBeer S. 2018. High-resolution extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis provides evidence for a longer Fe...Fe distance in the Q intermediate of methane monooxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140: 16807-16820. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10313
  37. Jacobs AB, Banerjee R, Deweese DE, Braun A, Babicz JT, Jr., Gee LB, et al. 2021. Nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopic definition of the Fe(IV)2 intermediate Q in methane monooxygenase and its reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 16007-16029. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05436
  38. Schulz CE, Castillo RG, Pantazis DA, DeBeer S, Neese F. 2021. Structure-spectroscopy correlations for intermediate Q of soluble methane monooxygenase: insights from QM/MM calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 6560-6577. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01180
  39. Tinberg CE, Lippard SJ. 2009. Revisiting the mechanism of dioxygen activation in soluble methane monooxygenase from M. capsulatus (Bath): evidence for a multi-step, proton-dependent reaction pathway. Biochemistry 48: 12145-12158. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi901672n
  40. Tinberg CE, Lippard SJ. 2011. Dioxygen activation in soluble methane monooxygenase. Acct. Chem. Res. 44: 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar1001473
  41. Shu L, Nesheim JC, Kauffmann K, Munck E, Lipscomb JD, Que L, Jr. 1997. An Fe2IVO2 diamond core structure for the key intermediate Q of methane monooxygenase. Science 275: 515-518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5299.515
  42. Liang AD, Lippard SJ. 2014. Component interactions and electron transfer in toluene/o-xylene monooxygenase. Biochemistry 53: 7368-7375. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500892n
  43. Liu KE, Valentine AM, Wang DL, Huynh BH, Edmondson DE, Salifoglou A, et al. 1995. Kinetic and spectroscopic characterization of intermediates and component interactions in reactions of methane monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117: 10174-10185. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00146a002
  44. Lund J, Dalton H. 1985. Further characterization of the FAD and Fe2S2 redox centres of component C, the NADH: acceptor reductase of the soluble methane monooxygenase of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Eur. J. Biochem. 147: 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08749.x
  45. Murray LJ, Lippard SJ. 2007. Substrate trafficking and dioxygen activation in bacterial multicomponent monooxygenases. Acct. Chem. Res. 40: 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar600040e
  46. Rosenzweig AC, Sazinsky MH. 2006. Structural insights into dioxygen-activating copper enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 16: 729-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.09.005