DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Liquid and Solid-State Fermentation Processes for the Production of Enzymes and Beta-Glucan from Hulled Barley

  • Lee, Se Yeon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Global K-Food Research Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Ra, Chae Hun (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Engineering, Global K-Food Research Center, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2021.11.02
  • Accepted : 2021.12.13
  • Published : 2022.03.28

Abstract

Solid-state fermentation using hulled barley was carried out to produce enzymes and β-glucan. The one-factor-at-a-time experiments were carried out to determine the optimal composition of the basal medium. The modified synthetic medium composition in liquid-state fermentation was determined to be 70 g/l hulled barley, 0 g/l rice bran, 5 g/l soytone, and 6 g/l ascorbic acid. Optimal pretreatment conditions of hulled barley by solid-state fermentation were evaluated in terms of maximum production of fungal biomass, amylase, protease, and β-glucan, which were 1.26 mg/g, 31310.34 U/g, 2614.95 U/g, and 14.6% (w/w), respectively, at 60 min of pretreatment condition. Thus, the solid-state fermentation process was found to enhance the overall fermentation yields of hulled barley to produce high amounts of enzymes and β-glucan.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No.2019R1G1A1007247).

References

  1. Sandhu KS, Punia S. 2017. Enhancement of bioactive compounds in barley cultivars by solid substrate fermentation. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11: 1355-1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9513-6
  2. Liu Q, Yao H. 2007. Antioxidant activities of barley seeds extracts. Food Chem. 102:732-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.051
  3. Chan GCF, Chan WK, Sze DMY. 2009. The effects of β-glucan on human immune and cancer cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2: 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-2-25
  4. Mansor A, Ramli MS, Rashid NYA, Samat N, Lani MN, Sharifudin SA, et al. 2019. Evaluation of selected agri-industrial residues as potential substrates for enhanced tannase production via solid-state fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 20: 1012-1016.
  5. Ji SB, Ra CH. 2021. Coproduction of enzymes and beta-glucan by Aspergillus oryzae using solid-state fermentation of brown rice. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31: 1028-1034. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05005
  6. Jin FJ, Hu S, Wang BT, Jin L. 2021. Advances in genetic engineering technology and its application in the industrial fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Front. Microbiol. 12: 644404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.644404
  7. Mille-Lindblom C, Von Wachenfeldt E, Tranvik LJ. 2004. Ergosterol as a measure of living fungal biomass: persistence in environmental samples after fungal death. J. Microbiol. Methods 59: 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.010
  8. Pasanen AL, Yli-Pietila K, Pasanen P, Kalliokoski P, Tarhanen J. 1999. Ergosterol content in various fungal species and biocontaminated building materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.1.138-142.1999
  9. Gessner MO, Schmitt AL. 1996. Use of solid-phase extraction to determine ergosterol concentrations in plant tissue colonized by fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.2.415-419.1996
  10. Klamer M, Baath E. 2004. Estimation of conversion factors for fungal biomass determination in compost using ergosterol and PLFA 18:2 ω6,9. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.08.019
  11. Irfan M, Nadeem M, Syed Q. 2014. One-factor-at-time (OFAT) optimization of xylanase production from Trichoderma viride-IR05 in solid-state fermentation. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 7: 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.04.004
  12. Beni A, Soki E, Lajtha K, Fekete I. 2014. An optimized HPLC method for soil fungal biomass determination and its application to a detritus manipulation study. J. Microbiol. Methods 103:124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.05.022
  13. Qureshi AS, Khushk I, Ali CH, Chisti Y, Ahmad A, Majeed H. 2016. Coproduction of protease and amylase by thermophilic Bacillus sp. BBXS-2 using open solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 8: 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.09.006
  14. Yoo HU, Ko MJ, Chung MS. 2020. Hydrolysis of beta-glucan in oat flour during subcritical-water extraction. Food Chem. 308: 125670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125670
  15. Ellaiah P, Adinarayana K, Bhavani Y, Padmaja P, Srinivasulu B. 2002. Optimization of process parameters for glucoamylase production under solid state fermentation by a newly isolated Aspergillus species. Process Biochem. 38: 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00188-7
  16. Robinson PK. 2015. Enzymes: principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biochem. 59: 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0590001
  17. Kalyanasundaram GT, Doble M, Gummadi SN. 2012. Production and downstream processing of (1→3)-β-D-glucan from mutant strain of Agrobacterium sp ATCC31750. AMB Express 2: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-31
  18. Sadh PK, Kumar S, Chawla P, Duhan JS. 2018. Fermentation: a boon for production of bioactive compounds by processing of food industries wastes (by-product). Molecules 23: 2560. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102560
  19. Alauddin M, Islam J, Shirakawa H, Koseki T, Ardiansyah, Komai M. Rice bran as a functional food: an overview of the conversion of rice bran into a superfood/functional food (an overview of their processing and utilization), pp. 291-305., Waisundara V, Shiom N (eds.), IntechOpen, London, U.K.
  20. Oliveira MDS, Feddern V, Kupsk L, Cipolatti EP, Badiale-Furlong E, de Souza-Soares LA. 2011. Changes in lipid, fatty acids and phospholipids composition of whole rice bran after solid-state fungal fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 8335-8335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.025
  21. Kammoun R, Naili B, Bejar S. 2008. Application of a statistical design to the optimization of parameters and culture medium for α-amylase production by Aspergillus oryzae CBS 819.72 grown on gruel (wheat grinding by-product). Bioresour. Technol. 99: 5602-5609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.045
  22. Yasui M, Oda K, Masuo S, Hosoda S, Katayama T, Maruyama J, et al. 2020. Invasive growth of Aspergillus oryzae in rice koji and increase of nuclear number. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 7: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-020-00099-9
  23. EI-Naggar MY, EI-Assar SA, Abdul-Gawad SM. 2009. Solid-state fermentation for the production of meroparamycin by Streptomyces sp. strain MAR01. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 468-473. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0807.457
  24. He Q, Chen HZ. 2013. Pilot-scale gas double-dynamic solid-state fermentation for the production of industrial enzymes. Food Bioprocess Technol. 6: 2916-2924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0956-9
  25. Han JA, Lim ST. 2009. Effect of presoaking on textural, thermal, and digestive properties of cooked brown rice. Cereal Chem. 86: 100-105. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-86-1-0100
  26. Yu L, Turner M, Fitzgerald M, Stokes JR, Witt T. 2017. Review of the effects of different processing technologies on cooked and convenience rice quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 59:124-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.11.009
  27. EI-Shishtawy RM, Mohamed SA, Asiri AM, Gomaa AM, Ibrahim IH, AI-Talhi HA. 2014. Solid fermentation of wheat bran for hydrolytic enzymes production and saccharification content by a local isolate Bacillus megatherium. BMC Biotechnol. 14: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-14-29
  28. Cuadra T, Fernandez FJ, Tomasini A, Barrios-Gonzalez J. 2008. Influence of pH regulation and nutrient content on cephalosporin C production in solid-state fermentation by Acremonium chrysogenum C10. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46: 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02285.x
  29. Lambo AM, Oste R, Nyman MEGL. 2005. Dietary fibre in fermented oat and barley β-glucan rich concentrates. Food Chem. 89: 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.035
  30. Schwarz WH. 2001. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56: 634-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100710