산업융합연구 (Journal of Industrial Convergence)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.1-10
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2635-8875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2672-0124(eISSN)
대한산업경영학회 (DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

겸손리더십이 구성원의 발언행동과 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 감성활용의 매개효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Humble Leadership on Voice Behavior and Innovative Behavior: Focused on the Mediating Effect of Emotional Regulation

  • 투고 : 2022.02.07
  • 심사 : 2022.03.20
  • 발행 : 2022.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경영진 일부의 오만함, 권력의식 등으로 인해 기업 이미지에 큰 타격을 받고 있다는 연구 결과(Boje et al. 2004)가 제시되고, ESG 경영에 관심이 고조됨으로써 최근 리더의 겸손이 부각되고 있다. 그리고 MZ세대의 등장으로 조직을 이끄는 리더의 겸손은 더욱 더 중요시된다(Morris et al. 2005; Vera, Rodriguez-Lopez, 2004; Owens et al. 2013). 본 논문은 겸손리더십과 발언행동, 혁신행동의 관계에서 감성활용의 매개효과를 실증 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 부산·경남·경북지역의 기업 종업원을 대상으로 2021년 11월~12월 설문조사하여 총 145명의 설문결과를 통해 실증분석하였다. 그 결과 겸손리더십은 발언행동, 혁신행동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치고, 겸손리더십이 발언행동 및 혁신행동의 관계에서 감성활용의 매개효과도 유의미한 결과가 검증되었다. 이를 통해 본 연구는 리더의 핵심역량인 겸손리더십과 감성활용의 관계를 새롭게 조명하고 인과관계를 밝히는 등 연구 범위를 확대하였다. 추후 연구에서는 겸손리더십과 다양한 변수와의 관계를 모색하고 다양한 연구방법으로 그 관계를 규명해보고자 한다.

The results(Boje et al. 2004) suggest that corporate image is severely damaged due to arrogance and a sense of power among some of the executives. With the advent of the MZ generation, the humility of leaders who lead the organization becomes more and more important(Morris et al. 2005; Vera, Rodriguez-Lopez, 2004; Owens et al. 2013). This paper tried to empirically analyze the mediating effect of emotional regulation in the relationship between humble leadership, voice behavior, and innovative behavior. To this end, a survey was conducted from November to December 2021 for corporate employees in Busan, Gyeongnam, and Gyeongbuk, and was empirically analyzed through the results of a total of 145 surveys. As a result, it was verified that humble leadership had a positive(+) effect on voice behavior and innovative behavior, and the mediating effect of emotional regulation in the relationship between humble leadership and voice behavior and innovative behavior was also verified. Through this, this study expanded the scope of research by newly illuminating the relationship between humble leadership and emotional regulation, which are the core competencies of leaders, and revealing the causal relationship. In future research, we intend to explore the relationship between humble leadership and various variables and to investigate the relationship through various research methods.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by the Fund for Humanities & Social Studies at Pusan National University 2018.

참고문헌

  1. J. W. Tak & J. G. Shin. (2018). The Effect of the Participative Leadership and Psychological Safety on Voice Behavior: Focusing on the Moderated Mediating Effect of Growth Need Strength. Journal of Organization and Management, 42(1), 01-34. DOI : 10.36459/jom.2018.42.1.1
  2. J. K. Kim. (2017). A Study on Characteristics of Emerging Leadership Researches and the Team Effectiveness of Shared Leadership. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(6), 207-217. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.6.207
  3. Y. Wang, J. Liu & Y. Zhu. (2018). How does humble leadership promote follower creativity? The roles of psychological capital and growth need strength. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 507-521. DOI : 10.1108/LODJ-03-2017-0069
  4. S. M. Hong. (2020). CEO Humble Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effect of Firm Slack. Journal of Economics Marketing, and Management, 8(2), 27-38. DOI : 10.20482/jemm.2020.8.2.27
  5. H. B. Kim & S. E. Kim. (2021, August). An exploratory study on the facilitating and hindering factors for leadership in non-face-to-face situations. Inspiring Insight in Business Society 2021 23rd Convergence Conference. (pp. 1948-1956). Seoul : Korean Academic Society of Business Administration.
  6. J. Y. Kim & Y. C. Jang. (2018). The Effect of Leader Humility Perceived by Employees on Organizational Effectiveness: Moderating Effects of Task Interdependence. Journal of Creativity and Innovation, 11(2), 63-99. DOI : 10.22834/PDS.2018.11.2.63
  7. G. Afshan, M. Kashif, F. Khanum, M. A. Khuhro & U. Akram. (2021). High involvement work practices often lead to burnout, but thanks to humble leadership. Journal of Management Development, 40(6), 503-525. DOI : 10.1108/JMD-10-2020-0311
  8. M. Ali, L. Zhang, S. J. Shah, S. Khan & A. M. Shah. (2020). Impact of humble leadership on project success: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and innovative work behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 349-367. DOI : 10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0230
  9. K. Yang, L. Zhou, Z. Wang, C. Lin & Z. Luo. (2019). Humble leadership and innovative behaviour among Chinese nurses: The mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1801-1808. DOI : 10.1111/jonm.12879
  10. F. Zhou & Y. J. Wu. (2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375-387. DOI : 10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181
  11. H. J. Oh & M. H. Chung. (2014). Employee Voice Behavior: Exploring Antecedents and Examining the Moderating Effects of Group Conflicts. Korean Journal of Management, 22(4), 35-70. UCI : G704-000359.2014.22.4.004
  12. S. G. Choi & S. G. Ji. (2012). A Study on the Impact of Supervisor's Behavior on the Psychological Safety, Silence, and ProSocial Voice. Journal of Organization and Management, 36(4), 99-123. UCI : G704-000984.2012.36.4.003
  13. D. Kim & S. Lee. (2020). How Paternalistic Leadership affects Employee Voice Behavior in Korean Hierachical Organizations?. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 8(2), 48-57. DOI : 10.17703/IJACT.2020.8.2.48
  14. J. K. Kim. (2017). The Effect of Emotional Intelligence on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Innovative Behavior in Manufacture of Automobile industry. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(2), 67-80. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.67
  15. J. K. Kim & K. H. Park. (2018). Relations between Intrapreneurship and Emotional Intelligence, Supportive Leadership and Adaptation Performance in Organization. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(11), 289-301. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.289
  16. Y. H. Kang. (2019). Cultural Influence on Change Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Mediating effect of Emotional Intelligence and Psychological Empowerment: International Study of Four Countries. Doctoral dissertation. Pusan National University, Busan.
  17. M. J. Song. (2016). Tracking on Attention to the Emotion and Sensibility and its Application at the Innovative Companies: Focused on Content Analysis of Annual Reports. Sci. Emot. Sensib., 19(1), 39-48. DOI : 10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.1.39
  18. Y. H. Kang & J. K. Kim. (2018). Emotional Regulation's influence on Authentic Leadership and Change Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 8(8), 1-9. DOI : 10.21742/AJMAHS.2018.08.02
  19. M. J. Kang, S. W. Kang & S. Y. Son. (2019). Exploring the impact of abusive supervision on constructive voice behavior: Mediating role of psychological ownership and moderating effect of core self-evaluation. Journal of Organization and Management, 43(2), 39-65. DOI : 10.36459/jom.2019.43.2.39
  20. M. Ali, Z. Li, S. Khan, S. J. Shah & R. Ullah. (2020). Linking humble leadership and project success: the moderating role of top management support with mediation of team-building. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), 545-562. DOI : 10.1108/IJMPB-01-2020-0032
  21. G. H. Kang, S. Y. Son & W. Jeong. (2018). The Effects of Leader Humility on Follower's Voice Behavior: The Moderating Effects of Follower's Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Effects of Leader Voice Solicitation. Korean Journal of Management, 26(2), 113-141. DOI : 10.26856/kjom.2018.26.2.113
  22. Y. Choi & Y. Cho. (2021). The Effects of Leader Perspective Taking and Emotional Intelligence on Voice Behavior: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy for Voice. Korean Journal of Management, 29(1), 1-23. DOI : 10.26856/kjom.2021.29.1.1
  23. B. P. Owens & D. R. Hekman. (2012). Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787-818. DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.0441
  24. C. S. Wong & K. S. Law. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243-274. DOI : 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
  25. J. Liang & J. L. Farh. (2008, June). Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations: a two-wave longitudinal examination. Third International Association of Chinese Management Research Conference. Guangzhou : HKUST SPD.
  26. O. Janssen. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302. DOI : 10.1348/096317900167038
  27. J. H. Han. (2021). Effect of Leader Behavioral Integrity on the Voice Behavior and Change-oriented OCB of Members: The Mediating Effect of Relational Identification and Moderating Effect of Psychological Safety. Korean Journal of Management, 29(1), 87-111. DOI : 10.26856/kjom.2021.29.1.87
  28. R. Hendijani & B. Sohrabi. (2019). The effect of humility on emotional and social competencies: The mediating role of judgement. Hendijani & Sohrabi, Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1-16. DOI : 10.1080/23311975.2019.1641257
  29. M. H. Kim & Y. M. Lee. (2020). Analysis of Structural Relationships among the Group Culture, Organizational Trust, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention. Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(2), 527-554. DOI : 10.15818/ihss.2020.21.2.527
  30. A. Lumpkin & R. M. Achen. (2018). Explicating the synergies of self-determination theory, ethical leadership, servant leadership, and emotional intelligence. Journal of leadership studies, 12(1), 6-20. DOI : 10.1002/jls.21554
  31. Z. X. Qi & M. J. Kim. (2020). The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance in China Firms: Focused on the Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence and the Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy. International business review, 24(1), 33-48. DOI : 10.21739/IBR.2020.03.24.1.33
  32. J. A. Morris, C. M. Brotheridge, & J. C. Urbanski. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58(10), 1323-1350. DOI : 10.1177/0018726705059929
  33. K. N. Walters & D. L. Diab. (2016). Humble leadership: Implications for psychological safety and follower engagement. Journal of leadership studies, 10(2), 7-18. DOI : 10.1002/jls.21434
  34. L. Yuan, L. Zhang, & Y. Tu. (2018). When a leader is seen as too humble. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 468-481. DOI : 10.1108/LODJ-03-2017-0056