DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Volumetric analysis of normal condyles and those with disc displacement with reduction in the Indonesian population: A CBCT study

  • Nawawi, Azkya Patria (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Jendral Ahmad Yani) ;
  • Rikmasari, Rasmi (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran) ;
  • Kurnikasari, Erna (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran) ;
  • Oscandar, Fahmi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran) ;
  • Lita, Yurika Ambar (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran)
  • Received : 2021.09.26
  • Accepted : 2021.11.03
  • Published : 2022.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: Disc displacement can cause resorption of the head of the condyle and affect its volume. This study analysed the volume of normal condyles and those with disc displacement with reduction (DDR) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from the Indonesian population. Materials and Methods: This study analysed 56 condyles (26 normal and 30 with DDR) from patients who visited the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Unit after being referred from the Prosthodontics Unit at Dental Hospital Universitas Padjadjaran from December 2020 to February 2021. Samples were divided into 2 groups (normal and DDR left and right-side condyles) based on the DC/TMD Axis 1 form through the clinical examination results. Both sample groups were exposed to CBCT radiation. The CBCT imaging results in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format were exported to the open-source ITK-SNAP format to determine condyle volume. Volumetric data from the cortical and trabecular areas of the right or left side condyles were arranged by sex. The independent t-test was used to determine the significance of differences with IBM SPSS version 21.0. Intra- and inter-observer reliability and validity were tested before determining the volume of the condyles. Results: Normal condyles and DDR condyles showed significant differences in volume (P<0.05). Significant differences were also seen in cortical (P=0.0007) and trabecular (P=0.0045) volumes. There was a significant difference in condylar volume based on sex. Conclusion: The normal condyle volume was significantly different from the DDR condyle volume in both sexes.

Keywords

References

  1. Matsumoto K, Kameoka S, Amemiya T, Yamada H, Araki M, Iwai K, et al. Discrepancy of coronal morphology between mandibular condyle and fossa is related to pathogenesis of anterior disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol 2013; 116: 626-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.028
  2. de Melo DP, Sousa Melo SL, de Andrade Freitas Oliveira LS, Ramos-Perez FM, Campos PS. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its correlation with pain and osseous abnormalities in symptomatic young patients with magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Radiol 2015; 119: 107-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.09.022
  3. Chang MS, Choi JH, Yang IH, An JS, Heo MS, Ahn SJ. Relationships between temporomandibular joint disk displacements and condylar volume. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018; 11: 192-8.
  4. Poluha RL, Canales GT, Costa YM, Grossmann E, Bonjardim LR, Conti PC. Temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a review of mechanisms and clinical presentation. J Appl Oral Sci 2019; 27: e20180433. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0433
  5. Garagiola U, Mercatali L, Bellintani C, Fodor A, Farronato G, Lorincz A. Change in condylar and mandibular morphology in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: cone beam volumetric imaging. Fogorv Sz 2013; 106: 27-31.
  6. Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Kucuk M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1812-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.070
  7. Farronato M, Cavagnetto D, Abate A, Cressoni P, Fama A, Maspero C. Assessment of condylar volume and ramus height in JIA patients with unilateral and bilateral TMJ involvement: retrospective case-control study. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 2635-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03122-5
  8. Scarfe W, Farman A, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of conebeam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
  9. Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013; 3: 80-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.110069
  10. Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A, Nakamura S, Okochi K, Momin MA. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 270-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25151578
  11. Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging 2010; 10: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-10-28
  12. Ferreira CL, Silva MA, Felicio CM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in women and men. Codas 2016; 28: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162014218
  13. Oltramari-Navarro PV, Yoshie MT, Silva RA, Conti AC, Navarro RL, Marchiori LL, et al. Influence of the presence of temporomandibular disorders on postural balance in the elderly. Codas 2017; 29: e20160070.
  14. Chisnoiu AM, Picos AM, Popa S, Chisnoiu PD, Lascu L, Picos A, et al. Factors involved in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders - a literature review. Clujul Med 2015; 88: 473-8. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-485
  15. Rikmasari R, Kusumadewi AN, Damayanti L, Dziab H, Kurnikasari E. The analysis of temporomandibular disorder based on RDC/TMD Axis I revision 2010 in dentistry students. Padjadjaran J Dent 2016; 28: 111-20.
  16. Bueno CH, Pereira DD, Pattussi MP, Grossi PK, Grossi ML. Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2018; 45: 720-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12661
  17. Cevidanes LH, Walker D, Schilling J, Sugai J, Giannobile W, Paniagua B, et al. 3D osteoarthritic changes in TMJ condylar morphology correlates with specific systemic and local biomarkers of disease. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 1657-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.014
  18. Byun ES, Ahn SJ, Kim TW. Relationship between internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint and dentofacial morphology in women with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005; 128: 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.028
  19. Milam S. Pathogenesis of degenerative temporomandibular joint arthritides. Odontology 2005; 93: 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-005-0056-7
  20. Al-Koshab M, Nambiar P, John J. Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in south-east Asians. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0121682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121682
  21. Mostafavi M, Vahdat AS, Javadian L, Ghaznavi A. Analysis of condylar volume in relation to craniofacial morphology using cone beam computed tomography. J Contemp Med Sci 2018; 4: 202-6.
  22. Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: combining digital echnologies. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 179-90. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179
  23. Ikeda K, Kawamura A, Ikeda R. Assessment of optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes with limited conebeam computed tomography. J Prosthodont 2011; 20: 432-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00730.x
  24. Schnabl D, Rottler AK, Schupp W, Boisseree W, Grunert I. CBCT and MRT imaging in patients clinically diagnosed with temporomandibular joint arthralgia. Heliyon 2018; 4: e00641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00641
  25. Pupo YM, Pantoja LL, Veiga FF, Stechman-Neto J, Zwir LF, Farago PV, et al. Diagnostic validity of clinical protocols to assess temporomandibular disk displacement disorders: a metaanalysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 122: 572-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.07.004
  26. Vogl TJ, Lauer HC, Lehnert T, Naguib NN, Ottl P, Filmann N, et al. The value of MRI in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction: correlation of MRI and clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 714-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.001
  27. Yushkevich PA, Gao Y, Gerig G. ITK-SNAP: an interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016; 2016: 3342-5.