DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accurate Wind Speed Prediction Using Effective Markov Transition Matrix and Comparison with Other MCP Models

Effective markov transition matrix를 이용한 풍속예측 및 MCP 모델과 비교

  • Kang, Minsang (Wind Energy Research Team, Korea Institute of Energy Research) ;
  • Son, Eunkuk (Wind Energy Research Team, Korea Institute of Energy Research) ;
  • Lee, Jinjae (Wind Energy Research Team, Korea Institute of Energy Research) ;
  • Kang, Seungjin (Wind Energy Research Team, Korea Institute of Energy Research)
  • Received : 2022.01.10
  • Accepted : 2022.02.23
  • Published : 2022.03.25

Abstract

This paper presents an effective Markov transition matrix (EMTM), which will be used to calculate the wind speed at the target site in a wind farm to accurately predict wind energy production. The existing MTS prediction method using a Markov transition matrix (MTM) exhibits a limitation where significant prediction variations are observed owing to random selection errors and its bin width. The proposed method selects the effective states of the MTM and refines its bin width to reduce the error of random selection during a gap filling procedure in MTS. The EMTM reduces the level of variation in the repeated prediction of wind speed by using the coefficient of variations and range of variations. In a case study, MTS exhibited better performance than other MCP models when EMTM was applied to estimate a one-day wind speed, by using mean relative and root mean square errors.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 한국수력원자력(주)에서 재원을 부담하여 한국에너지기술연구원에서 수행한 연구결과이며(No. 2019-기술-12), 산업통상자원부의 재원으로 한국에너지기술평가원의 지원을 받아 수행한 연구 결과입니다(풍력발전 제어시스템 국산화 기술개발, 20213030020230).

References

  1. Lee, J.J., Kang, S.J., Lee, G.S., Kim, H.W., Kim, S.O., Ahn, Y.O., and Kyong, N.H., 2020, "Validation of floating LiDAR system for development of offshore wind farms", New. Renew. Energy, 16(3), 35-41.
  2. Liu, X., Lai, X., and Zou, J., 2017, "A new MCP method of wind speed temporal interpolation and extrapolation considering wind speed mixed uncertainty", Energies, 10(8), 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081231
  3. Rogers, A.L., Rogers, J.W., and Manwell, J.F., 2005, "Comparison of the performance of four measure-correlate-predict algorithms", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 93(3), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.12.002
  4. Mifsud, M.D., Sant, T., and Farrugia, R.N., 2019, "Analysing uncertainties in offshore wind farm power output using measure correlate predict methodologies", Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 601-621 https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-601-2020
  5. Carta, J.A., and Velazquez, S., 2011, "A new probabilistic method to estimate the long-term wind speed characteristics at a potential wind energy conversion site", Energy, 36(5), 2671-2685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.008
  6. Ali, S., Lee, S.M., and Jang, C.M., 2018, "Forecasting the long-term wind data via Measure-Correlate-Predict (MCP) methods", Energies, 11(6), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061541
  7. Son, J.H., Ko, K.N., Huh, J.C., and Kim, I.H., 2017, "Mutual application of Met-Masts wind data on simple terrain for wind resource assessment", The J. of thr Korean Soc. for Power Syst. Eng., 21(6), 31-39.
  8. Lambert, T., 2019, "Windographer (version 4.2) S/W manual".
  9. Ryu, K.W., 2021, "Use of Markov chains for synthetic wind data generation and its statistical verification", Wind. Energy, 12(3), 13-18.