The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A basic research for the development of Korean mathematics education standards for the next generation

미래세대 수학교육표준 개발을 위한 기초 연구

  • Received : 2022.02.09
  • Accepted : 2022.02.21
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to elicit the vision of the future human being and mathematical competencies that next generation should pursue to be nurtured through mathematics education as regarding the need for a national mid-term to long-term mathematics education standard for nurturing learners that can accommodate changes in the future society is emerging. The research team established the criterion for domains of mathematical competencies through the analysis of prior research, and then, refined three dimensions of mathematical competencies and the domains of each dimension through expert advice (9 people in total, 3 times) and focus group interviews (10 people in total, 4 times). After conducting a large-scale survey (295 people in total) which includes elementary and secondary teachers, professors, and researchers, etc., the vision of the future human being and mathematical competencies were elicited. In order to utilize the vision of the future human being and mathematical competencies, five stages of research on the development and utilization of mathematics education standards were proposed. Cooperating with related organizations, securing the research project period and expanding the scope of research team composition, and providing web-based documentation of mathematics education standards will be needed for the follow-up studies.

이 연구는 국가 차원의 중장기적 수학교육표준 마련의 일환으로 미래 수학교육이 추구해야 할 인간상, 수학 역량을 도출하는 데 목적이 있다. 연구진은 선행 연구 분석, 전문가 자문, 초점 집단 면담을 거쳐 인간상, 수학 역량을 도출하였으며, 설문조사를 통한 타당화 과정을 거쳤다. 미래인간상과 수학 역량의 세부 내용을 제시하였으며, 수학교육의 방향을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. B. (2017). Change of Education Paradigm in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Media and Education, 7(1), 21-34.
  2. Bradley, D., & Huseman, S. (2003). Validating competency at the bedside. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19(4), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124645-200307000-00001
  3. Cho, S. M., Ku, N. W., Kim, H. J., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, I. W. (2019). OECD programme for international students assessment : an analysis of PISA 2018 results. Jincheon: KICE.
  4. Chung, K. H., Kim, J. A., Park, S. J., Son, C. H., Lee, J. D., Kim, J. S., Lim, Y. W., Lee, H. Y. (2016). High School Innovation Strategies for a Tailored Career Demand Education. Seoul: KEDI.
  5. Cuoco, A., & McCallum, W. (2018). Curricular coherence in mathematics. In Mathematics Matters in Education (pp. 245-256). Springer: Cham.
  6. Gilead, T., & Dishon, G. (2021). Rethinking future uncertainty in the shadow of COVID 19: Education, change, complexity and adaptability, Educational Philosophy and Theory.
  7. Hesse, F., Buder, J. Care, E., Griffin, P., & Sassenberg, K. (2012). Draft: A Framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. ATC21S: Australia, Melbern. http://atc21s.org/wp-content/uploads/2014 /01/white-paper7-Framework-for-Teachable-Collaborative-ProblemSolving-Skills_DRAFT.pdf
  8. Hong, E. S. (2015). A critical examination of the visions of an educated person in the national curriculum, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 227-250.
  9. Jeon, S. J., Ko, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., Kwak, Y. S., Choi, S. Y., & Park, M. A. (2017). Development for "Science for All Koreans". Seoul: KOFAC.
  10. Kim, D. H., Han, K. H., & Jang, D. H. (2016). Research on the talent of 2030 future society and milestone of core science competencies. Seoul: KOFAC.
  11. Kim, H. B., Kang, N. H., Kim, M. H., Maeng, S. H., Park, J. S., Baek, Y. S., Son, J. W., Shim, G. C., Oh, P. S., Lee, K. Y., Lee, B. W., Jeong, E. Y., Han, I. S., Ha, H. S., & Han, H. J. (2017). Final report of basic research project for the development of Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  12. Kim, Y. M., Kang, N. H., Kim, H. B., Baek, S. H., Shim, J. H., Lee, Y. J., Jeong, Y. J., Han, I. S., & Choi, E. S. (2015). A Study of Master Plan for Development of Korean Next Generation Science education Standards. Seoul: KOFAC.
  13. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. (2019). Scientific literacy for all Koreans - Korean Science Education Standards for the next generation. Seoul: Author.
  14. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2016). Educational Development Strategy for the Intelligent Information Society: Focusing on Curriculum and Evaluation Improvement. Issue Paper. Seoul: Author.
  15. Kwon, O. N., Lee, K. W., Lee, A. R., Han, C. R. (2019). A comparative study on the external & internal structure of mathematics curriculum between Korea and Japan : Focusing on the aspects of recent revisions. The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 187-223. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.2.187
  16. Kwon, O. N., Park, S. M., Lee, K. W. (2019). The Mechanisms of Coherence between General and Subject Curriculum Documents: Focusing on Mathematics Curriculum Development Procedures in Australia and Japan. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.37.3.8
  17. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.
  18. Manley, K., & Garbett, B. (2000). Paying Peter and Paul: Reconciling concepts of expertise with competency for a clinical career structure. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00408.x
  19. Milner-Bolotin, M. (2001). The effects of topic choice in project-based instruction on undergraduate physical science students' interest, ownership, and motivation. The University of Texas at Austin.
  20. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2020). Innovative Korea 2045. Sejong: Science & Technology policy Institute.
  21. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2021). Eliciting the essential competencies and the vision of the future human being for the development of Korean Mathematics Education Standards for the next generation. Sejong: Science & Technology policy Institute.
  22. Ministry of Education. (2016). The direction and strategy of mid- to long-term education policy in response to the intelligent information society. Sejong: Author.
  23. Ministry of Education. (2020a). Mathematics curriculum. Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2020-236[Annex 8]. Sejong: Author.
  24. Ministry of Education. (2020b). National guidelines for the elementary and secondary curriculum. Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2020-236[Annex 1]. Sejong: Author.
  25. Ministry of Education. (2020c). Manual for 2015 revised national guidelines - High school #2020-225. Sejong: Author.
  26. Ministry of Education. (2021). A better future, education for all - The main points for the 2022 revision national guidelines for the curriculum (Proposal). https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=S&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  27. National Research Council. (2013). The Mathematical Sciences in 2025. The National Academic Press.
  28. NCTM. (1989). The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  29. NCTM. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  30. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  31. Niss, M., & Hojgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
  32. Niss M., & Jablonka E. (2020). Mathematical Literacy. In: Lerman S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham.
  33. OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: a new framework for assessment. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  34. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Position Paper. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  35. Papert, S. (1980). "Mindstorms" Children. Computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
  36. Park, K. M., Lee, H. C., Park, S. H., Jang, H. W., Lee, M. K., Kwon, O. N., Shin, D. K., Kang, E. J., Kim, S. H., Rim, H. M., Kim, S. Y., Kang, T. S., Kwon, J. R., Kim, M. J., Bang, J. S., Lee, H. Y., Lim, M. I., Lee, M. G., Kim, H. K., ... , Kang, S. K. (2015). A study on the development of proposal for mathematics and curriculum according to the 2015 revision curriculum II. Seoul: KOFAC.
  37. Park, Y. S., & Glenn, J. (2015). State of the future 2045. Paju: Kyobobook.
  38. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  39. Sang, K. A., Kim, K. H., Park, S. W., Jeon, S. K., Park, M. M., & Lee, J. W. (2020). Trends in international mathematics and science study: TIMSS 2019 results analysis. Jincheon: KICE.
  40. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
  41. Shin, Y. S., Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. W., Lee, D. H., Song, M. H., Shin, H. G., Jang, H. W., Kim, S. M., Ko, H. K., Kim, S. H., Lee, H. C., Jang, S. J., Park, H. S., Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. R., Do, J. H., Kim, H. K., Jeon, C., Choi, H. W., ... , Song, H. J. (2011). A study on mathematics curriculum according to the 2009 revision of the national mathematics curriculum. Seoul: KOFAC.
  42. Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
  43. Song, J. W., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y. S., Kim, D. K., Kim, S. H., Na, J. Y., Do, J. H., Min, B. G., Park, S. C., Bae, S. M., Son, Y. A., Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J. K., Lim, H., Jeong, D. H., Jeong, Y. J., Jeong, J. H., Kim, J. H., & Kim, E. Y. (2018). Developing Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  44. Song, J. W., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y. S., Kim, D. K., Na, J. Y., Do, J. H., Park, S. C., Son, Y. A., Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J. K., Lee, H. J., Lim, H., Jeong, D. H., Jeong, Y. J., & Kim, J. H. (2019). Developing performance expectations, school implementation strategies, evaluation indicators of the Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
  45. Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-389
  46. Stinson, D. W., Wager, A., & Leonard, J. (2012). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  47. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  48. Woodruffe, C. (1993). What is meant by a competency? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053651
  49. World Economic Forum. (2016) Global Agenda: Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016. Geneva: Author.
  50. Yoon, S, J., Lee, A. R., Kwon, O. N. (2019). Analysis on the relationship between core competencies and mathematical competencies and the tasks for mathematical competencies : A case of high school 'Mathematics' textbooks according to 2015 revised mathematics curriculum. The Mathematical Education, 58(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.1.55