Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing a Learning Model based on Computational Thinking

컴퓨팅 사고기반 융합 수업모델 개발

  • Yu, Jeong-Su (Dept. of Computer Education, Jeonju National University of Education) ;
  • Jang, Yong-Woo (Dept. of Physical Education, Jeonju National University of Education)
  • 유정수 (전주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 장용우 (전주교육대학교 체육교육과)
  • Received : 2021.12.21
  • Accepted : 2022.02.20
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Computational thinking in the AI and Big Data era for digital society means a series of problem-solving methods that involve expressing problems and their solutions in ways that computers can execute. Computational thinking is an approach to solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior by deriving basic concepts in computer science, and solving difficult problems and elusive puzzles for students. We recently studied 93 pre-service teachers who are currently a freshman at ◯◯ university. The results of the first semester class, the participants created a satisfactory algorithm of the video level. Also, the proposed model was found to contribute greatly to the understanding of the computational thinking of the students participating in the class.

디지털 사회를 위한 AI와 빅데이터 시대의 컴퓨팅 사고는 컴퓨터가 실행할 수 있는 방식으로 우리가 해결하고자 하는 문제와 솔루션을 표현하는 일련의 문제해결 방법을 의미한다. 컴퓨팅 사고는 컴퓨터 과학의 기본 개념을 도출함으로써 문제를 해결하고 시스템을 설계하고 인간의 행동을 이해하는 것으로, 학생들에게는 어려운 문제와 애매한 퍼즐을 맞추는 접근법이다. 본 논문에서 우리는 컴퓨팅 사고를 댄스 동작과 융합하여 학생들이 문제를 해결할 수 있는 수업 모델을 개발하였다. 개발된 수업 모델을 가지고 ◯◯대학교 1학년 예비교원 93명을 대상으로 1학기 동안 수업한 결과, 수업 참가자들은 비디오 수준의 만족스러운 알고리즘을 만들어 냈다. 또한, 제안된 모델이 수업 참여 학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고 이해에 크게 기여함을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by the research fund of the Jeonju National University of Education National University fostering project in 2021.

References

  1. N. V. Venkatraman. (2017). The Digital Matrix : New Rules for Business Transformation Through Technology, LifeTree.
  2. APEC Human Resources Development Working Group. (2022). Developing Computational Thinking on AI and Big Data Era for Digital Society - Recommendations from APEC InMside I Project, APEC.
  3. P. J. Denning. (2009). The profession of IT Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1516046.1516054
  4. P. J. Denning. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438
  5. J. M. Wing. (2016). "Computational thinking," in Communications of the AMC, 29(3), 33-35.
  6. J. M. Wing. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications Of The ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  7. J. M. Wing. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. Social Issues In Computing 40th Anniversary Blog.
  8. D. Barr, J. Harrison & L. Conery. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading With Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
  9. Ministry of Education. (2020). Science Education Comprehensive Plan(draft) in 2020~2024.
  10. Ministry of Education. (2020). Mathematics Education Comprehensive Plan(draft) in 2020~2024.
  11. Ministry of Education. (2020). Information Education Comprehensive Plan(draft) in 2020~2024.
  12. R. M. Montoya, R. S. Horton, J. L. Vevea, M. Citkowicz & E. A. Laube. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459-498. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000085
  13. S. B. Daily, A. E. Leonard, S. Jorg, S. Babu & K. Gundersen. (2014). Dancing alice: Exploring embodied pedagogical strategies for learning computational thinking, Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 91-96.
  14. S. F. Vogelstein, L. Brady, C. Steinberg, R. Thomas, C. Champion, D. Lindberg, L. Enyedy, N. DesPortes, K. Payne, W. Bergner, Y. Taylor, E. & R. B. Shapiro. (2021). Embodying STEM: Learning at the intersection of Dance and STEM. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  15. M. A. Taylor, K. H. Shapiro, B. R. & Hall, R. (2020). Why Learning on the Move: Intersecting Research Pathways for Mobility, Learning and Teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 1-16. DOI : 10.1080/07370008.2020.1769100
  16. Y. S. Jeong, J. S. Yu, J. Y. Hong, J. S. Lim. (2019). Theory of Software Education, SIMAS.