Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite Element Analysis Study of CJS Composite Structural System with CFT Columns and Composite Beams

CFT기둥과 합성보로 구성된 CJS합성구조시스템의 유한요소해석 연구

  • Moon, A Hae (Deep Learning Architecture Research Center, Dept. of Architectural Eng., Sejong University) ;
  • Shin, Jiuk (Dept. of Architectural Eng., Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lim, Chang Gue (Deep Learning Architecture Research Center, Dept. of Architectural Eng., Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Kihak (Deep Learning Architecture Research Center, Dept. of Architectural Eng., Sejong University)
  • 문아해 (세종대학교 딥러닝건축연구소 건축공학과) ;
  • 신지욱 (경상국립대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 임창규 (세종대학교 딥러닝건축연구소 건축공학과) ;
  • 이기학 (세종대학교 딥러닝건축연구소 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.08
  • Accepted : 2021.12.27
  • Published : 2022.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents the effect on the inelastic behavior and structural performance of concrete and filled steel pipe through a numerical method for reliable judgment under various load conditions of the CJS composite structural system. Variable values optimized for the CJS synthetic structural system and the effects of multiple variables used for finite element analysis to present analytical modeling were compared and analyzed with experimental results. The Winfrith concrete model was used as a concrete material model that describes the confinement effect well, and the concrete structure was modeled with solid elements. Through geometric analysis of shell and solid elements, rectangular steel pipe columns and steel elements were modeled as shell elements. In addition, the slip behavior of the joint between the concrete column and the rectangular steel pipe was described using the Surface-to-Surface function. After finite element analysis modeling, simulation was performed for cyclic loading after assuming that the lower part of the foundation was a pin in the same way as in the experiment. The analysis model was verified by comparing the calculated analysis results with the experimental results, focusing on initial stiffness, maximum strength, and energy dissipation capability.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 (주) 충전공연개발과 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의(21TBIP-C161326-01)의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다. 이에 감사를 드립니다.

References

  1. Shen Q, Wang J. Performance and design of partially CFRP-jacketed circular CFT column under eccentric compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2020 Mar;166:105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105925
  2. Lin Y, Zong Z. Experimental and numerical studies of the seismic behavior of a steel concrete composite rigid-frame bridge subjected to the surface rupture at a thrust fault. Engineering Structures. 2020 Feb;205:105-110.
  3. Park KD, Hwang WS. Evaluation for Confined Effects by the Sectional Properties of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Columns. Korean Society of Steel Constructuion. 2010 Aug;22(4).
  4. Moharrami M, Koutromanos I. Finite element analysis of damage and failure of reinforced concrete members under earthquake loading. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn. 2017 Apr;46:2811-2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2932
  5. Azad S, Mirghaderi SR. Numerical investigation of steel and composite beam-to-encased composite column connection via a through-plate. 2021 Jun;31:14-28.
  6. Koloo FA, Badakhshan A. Investigation of Proposed Concrete Filled Steel Tube Connections under Reversed Cyclic Loading. Steel Structure. 2018;18(1):163-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0313-6
  7. Aghdamy S, Thambiratnam DP. Effects of load-related parameters on the response of concrete-filled double-skin steel tube columns subjected to lateral impact. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2017;138:642-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.08.015
  8. Abedini M, Zhang C. Blast Performance of Concrete Columns Retrofitted with FRP using Segment Pressure Technique. Composite Structures. 2020 Dec;260(2).
  9. Xu J. Behaviour of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete columns subjected to blast loading. Engineering Structures. 2016 Jul;118:97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.048
  10. Asgarpoor M, Gharavi A, Epackachi S. Investigation of various concrete material to simulate seismic response of RC structure. Structures. 2020 Feb;29:1322-1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.042
  11. LS-DYNA KEYWORD USER'S MANUAL VOl.1. Livemore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). c2007.
  12. Yoo SW, Kang GR. Influence of Various Parameter for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of FRP-Concrete Composite Beam Using Concrete Damaged Plasticity Model. The Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2017;18(2):697-703.
  13. Lee JH. Large Crack Model and Its Numerical Algorithm for Damage Analysis of Dynamically Loaded Structures. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2.
  14. Daniel K. Coleman Evaluation of Concrete Modeling in LS-DYNA for Seismic Application. The University of Texas at Austin. c2016.
  15. Malvar LJ, Simons D. Concrete Material Modeling in Explicit Computations. Computational Structure. c1996 Apr.
  16. Crawford JE, Wu Y. Use and Validation of The Release III K&C. Concrete Material Model in LS-DYNA. Karagozian&Case. c2012.
  17. Wu Y, Choi HJ. Concrete fragmentation modeling using coupled finite element - meshfree formulations. Techno-Press. 2013 Sep; 6(2):173-179.
  18. Wu Y, Crawford JE. Performance of LS-DYNA Concrete Constitutive Models. 12th International LS-DYNA Users Conference.
  19. Schwer L. An Introduction to the Winfrith Concrete Model. Schwer Engineering & Consulting Services. c2010 Apr.
  20. Kim JY, Park HG. Plasticity Model Using Three Orthogonal Stress Components for Concrete in Compression. The Journal of Korea concrete Institute. 2004 Jun;16(3):345-356. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2004.16.3.345
  21. Asgarpoor M, Gharavi A. Investigation of various concrete materials to simulate seismic response of RC structures. Structures. 2020 Dec;29.
  22. Shin JU. Multi-hazard performance criteria for non-ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings retrofitted with an FRP column jacketing system. Georgia Institute of Technology. c2017.
  23. Lee HS. Performance verification through finite element analysis (FEM) of steel link and eccentric frame-type progressive system that can respond to earthquakes step by step. Sejong Univ. c2020.
  24. Lim CG. Experimental study of the seismic performance of CJS Hybrid Structural Systems connected to the CFT column. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. c2021.
  25. Zhao MZ, Lehman DE. Modeling recommendations for RC and CFST sections in LS-Dyna including bond slip. Engineering Structures. 2021 Feb;229:111612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111612
  26. Vulcu C, Strantan A. Beam-to-CFT High-Strength Joints with External Diaphragm 1:Design and Experimental Validation. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2017 Jan;143(5).
  27. Shin KJ, Kim HS. Seismic Behavior of CFT Column-to-Beam Connections. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. c2008 Mar.
  28. Lee SW, Kim YJ, Shin KJ. Non-linear Analysis of Full Scaled CFT Column to H-Beam Connections with T-Stiffeners. Korean Society of Steel Constructuion. 2002;14(6):835-843.
  29. Rackauskaite E, Kotsovinos P. Model parameter sensitivity and benchmarking of the explicit dynamic solver of LS-DYNA for structural analysis in case of fire. Fire Safety Journal. 2017 Jun; 90:123-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.002