The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제14권1호
  • /
  • Pages.12-21
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar

  • Chae, Sung-Ki (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Won-Tak (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Eun-Bin (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Ji-Hyeon (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Gang-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.18
  • 심사 : 2022.01.04
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in retention and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments on a digital milled bar by performing chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal of prostheses in fully edentulous models. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Locator (Locator®; Zest Anchors Inc., Escondido, CA, USA) was selected as the control group and ADD-TOC (ADD-TOC; PNUAdd Co., Ltd., Busan, Republic of Korea) as the experimental group. A CAD-CAM milled bar was mounted on a master model and 3 threaded holes for connecting a bar attachment was formed using a tap. Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were then attached to the milled bar. Simulated mastication and repeated insertion/removal were performed over 400,000 cyclic loadings and 1,080 insertions/removals, respectively. Wear patterns on deformed attachment were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. For the ADD-TOC attachments, chewing simulation and repeated insertion/removal resulted in a mean initial retentive force of 24.43 ± 4.89 N, which were significantly lower than that of the Locator attachment, 34.33 ± 8.25 N (P < .05). Amounts of retention loss relative to baseline for the Locator and ADD-TOC attachments were 21.74 ± 7.07 and 8.98 ± 5.76 N (P < .05). CONCLUSION. CAD-CAM milled bar with the ADD-TOC attachment had a lower initial retentive force than the Locator attachment. However, the ADD-TOC attachment might be suitable for long-term use as it showed less deformation and had a higher retentive force after simulated mastication and insertion/removal repetitions.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

참고문헌

  1. DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:386-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90186-R
  2. Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1095-101.
  3. Mijiritsky E, Karas S. Removable partial denture design involving teeth and implants as an alternative to unsuccessful fixed implant therapy: a case report. Implant Dent 2004;13:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000136919.13387.94
  4. Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:468-73. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119921
  5. Narhi TO, Geertman ME, Hevinga M, Abdo H, Kalk W. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:43-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107113
  6. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  7. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1
  8. Watson CJ, Tinsley D, Sharma S. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture. Dent Update 2001;28:234-8, 240. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2001.28.5.234
  9. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x
  10. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:575-81.
  11. Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:468-73. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119921
  12. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:246-53.
  13. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125-30.
  14. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x
  15. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2
  16. Davodi A, Nishimura R, Beumer J 3rd. An implant-supported fixed-removable prosthesis with a milled tissue bar and Hader clip retention as a restorative option for the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:212-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70128-8
  17. Ercoli C, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Hagan ME. Alternative procedure for making a metal suprastructure in a milled bar implant-supported overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:253-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70120-9
  18. Brudvik JS, Chigurupati K. The milled implant bar: an alternative to spark erosion. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68:485-8.
  19. Galindo DF. The implant-supported milled-bar mandibular overdenture. J Prosthodont 2001;10:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00046.x
  20. Hebel KS, Galindo D, Gajjar RC. Implant position record and implant position cast: minimizing errors, procedures and patient visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:107-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70095-3
  21. Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:391-8.
  22. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Restoration of divergent free-standing implants in the maxilla. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0113:RODFII>2.3.CO;2
  23. Seo YH, Bae EB, Kim JW, Lee SH, Yun MJ, Jeong CM, Huh JB. Clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures via Locator implant attachment and Locator bar attachment. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:313-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.313
  24. Kim MS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:116-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.116
  25. Chiu LPY, Vitale ND, Petridis H, Petrudus H, McDonald A. The effect of different water temperatures on retention loss and material degradation of locator attachments. J Prosthodont 2017;26:537-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12440
  26. Choi JW, Bae JH, Jeong CM, Huh JB. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:628-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.027
  27. Choi JW, Choi KH, Chae HJ, Chae SK, Bae EB, Lee JJ, Lee SH, Jeong CM, Huh JB. Load-bearing capacity and retention of newly developed micro-locking implant prosthetic system: an in vitro pilot study. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040564
  28. Choi JW, Lee JJ, Bae EB, Huh JB. Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis with a microlocking implant prosthetic system: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:15-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.021
  29. Choi JW, Song CH, Huh JB. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with new retention type using zirconia ball and nickel-titanium spring. Implantology 2019;23:16-24. https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019002
  30. Kim MS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:116-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.116
  31. Oh SC, Han JS, Kim MJ. Implant supported overdenture using milled titanium bar with locator attachment on fully edentulous maxillae: a case report. J Dent Rehab Appl Sci 2011;27:223-31.
  32. Choi JW, Chae SK, Huh JB. Comparison of the retentive characteristics of two additional attachment used with an implant bar attachment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:173-80. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.2.173
  33. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Schmitt S. The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:570-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90465-5
  34. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  35. ELsyad MA, Dayekh MA, Khalifa AK. Locator versus bar attachment effect on the retention and stability of implant-retained maxillary overdenture: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e627-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12608
  36. Pigozzo MN, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Vaz LG. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60112-8
  37. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x
  38. McKeen LW. The effect of temperature and other factors on plastics and elastomers. 3rd ed., William Andrew 2014.
  39. Chiu LPY, Vitale ND, Petridis H, McDonald A. The effect of different water temperatures on retention loss and material degradation of locator attachments. J Prosthodont 2017;26:537-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12440
  40. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4
  41. Williams BH, Ochiai KT, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:603-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.120838