Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The CCDC database of Crystal Structures of Tetraamminecopper (II) [Cu(NH3)4]2+: Complicated Geometry of a Well-Known Complex Ion

  • Received : 2021.09.06
  • Accepted : 2021.12.01
  • Published : 2022.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

Tetraamminecopper (II), a complex ion with the formula [Cu(NH3)4]2+, is a well-known metal complex ion in general chemistry and basic inorganic chemistry.1,2 In addition, for over a century, [Cu(NH3)4]2+ has played an important role in industrially producing the cuprammonium rayon (cupro) by regenerating cellulose in a cuprammonium solution, that is, Schweizer’s reagent.3,4 This process has been used as a challenging research project in high school,5 and recently, [Cu(NH3)4]2+ has been used as a catalyst in chemical reactions.6,7

Some textbooks on chemical education (including Japanese textbooks of high schools) describe the geometry of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ as square planar8 (Fig. 1). However, other textbooks describe it as a tetrahedral9 or distorted octahedral10 geometry with two water molecules ([Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+). Additionally, some researchers indicated that in an ammoniacal aqueous solution, [Cu(NH3)4]2+ can exist as a distorted square planar with four-coordinated,11,12 five-coordinated square pyramidal,13,14 and six-coordinated distorted octahedral geometry with another H2O or NH3 molecule.15,16 From these studies, at room temperature, [Cu(NH3)4]2+ may dynamically exist as several inconstant structures in an aqueous ammoniacal solution of copper (II). If only one of the geometries of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ is shown in the textbook, would that be appropriate for chemical education?

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. [Cu(NH3)4]2+ as square planar, one of representative geometry of metal complex ions learned in chemical education.

So far, the geometries of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ in solution have been considered; however, in the crystalline state, X-ray analysis can help to determine the exact position of each atom in [Cu(NH3)4]2+, which makes its structure clearer than in solution. In some textbooks of chemical education, as far as investigated by the author, only one crystal of [Cu(NH3)4]SO4·H2O is referred to establish its structure as a distorted octahedral.10 In contrast, a variety of crystal structures of [Cu(NH3)4]2+, with different counter anions and/or solvent molecules, have been reported, and no textbooks seem to refer to them.

Therefore, herein, the author reports the crystal structures of 34 compounds consisting [Cu(NH3)4]2+, that were obtained from the data deposition of the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) to make these data available conveniently to the students and teachers of chemistry and to show the structures of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ in detail regarding their coordination numbers, distribution of the distances between the copper (II) centers, and the nitrogen atoms of the ammine ligands in the square planar geometry. In the case of the five-coordinate geometry, the author discusses whether the square pyramid or trigonal bipyramid geometry is appropriate and also discusses the planarity of each [Cu(NH3)4]2+ in every crystal.

[Cu(NH3)4]2+ Categorized by Their Coordination Numbers

The data for the crystalline compounds containing [Cu(NH3)4]2+ are listed in Table 1 (based on the cif files). These were categorized by their coordination numbers (Coord. No.); 4 indicates that four NH3 ligands are bound to the copper (II) center, and there are no atoms at a distance less than 2.5 Å in axial direction. Although 2.5 Å is greater than the sum of the ionic radii of each Cu2+ and donor atom, the interatomic interactions were considered to be non-negligible.48,49

Table 1. Crystal structures data of compounds containing [Cu(NH3)4]2+ categorized by their coordination numbers

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_t0001.png 이미지

The value of 2.5 Å was chosen on the basis that in the case of tetraamminecopper (II), donor atoms at distances larger than approximately 2.5 Å are not generally considered to interact with the copper (II) center.48,49 Coord. No. 5 in the Table 1 means that there is one atom within a distance of 2.5 Å from the copper (II) center, and Coord. No. 6 means that two atoms exist within a distance of 2.5 Å in the axial direction with four-coordinate of NH3.

In each category (Coord. No. 4, 5 and 6), they are arranged in the ascending order of the distances of the mean Cu-NH3. Interestingly, there were two modifications to [Cu(NH3)4] (ReO4)2: No. 21 (monoclinic), and No. 33 (triclinic). It was demonstrated in Table 2 that in the present cases of Coord. No. 6, the distance between the Cu2+ and the bounded sixth atom (= Y) in the axial direction are same as the values of Cu-X (X = fifth atom of the ligands out of the equatorial plane).

Table 2. Distances between copper(II) center and fifth or sixth ligands of complexes of [Cu(NH3)4X]2+ and [Cu(NH3)4XY]2+

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_t0002.png 이미지

Distribution of Mean Cu-NH3 Distances

A histogram of the range of the mean Cu-NH3 distances is shown in Fig. 2. The mean distance of Cu-NH3 for all 34 crystalline [Cu(NH3)4]2+-containing compounds was found to be 2.020 Å. In addition, the minimum value was 1.96095 Å for [Cu(NH3)4]·H[CoMo6O18(OH)6]·10H2O (No. 31), and the maximum value was 2.06432 Å for {[Cu(NH3)4][Ag2S3(SCN)3]}2 (No. 19).

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Distribution of the range of the distance of Cu-NH3.

For comparison, in the crystal of NH4[Cu(NH3)5](ClO4)3, the mean Cu-NH3 distance in the equatorial plane of pentaamminecopper (II) [Cu(NH3)5]2+ was reported to be 2.06681(0) Å,50 and in the crystal of [Cu(NH3)6][F(H2O)F] containing hexaamminecopper (II) [Cu(NH3)6]2+, the mean Cu-NH3 distance in the equatorial plane was reported to be 2.09229(0) Å51 (except for the each axial Cu-NH3). Both these distances were larger than the maximum value of 2.06432 Å for Cu-NH3 in [Cu(NH3)4]2+ for the 34 tetraamminecopper (II) compounds.

τ5 Parameters in 5-Coordinated [Cu(NH3)4X]2+

The geometry of the five-coordinate copper(II) complexes can be a square pyramid and a trigonal bipyramid. The value of τ5 is known as the index of the degree of trigonality of five-coordinate transition metal complexes, with τ5 = 0 indicating a perfect square pyramidal geometry and τ5 = 1 indicating a perfect trigonal bipyramidal geometry,52,53 and it is described as:

τ5 = (β - α)/60

where β is the larger of the two angles (Fig. 3). Thus, to identify the geometry of the [Cu(NH3)4X]2+ with Coord. No. 5, τ5 was calculated (Table 3). Consequently, it was revealed that nine compounds had square pyramidal geometries and two had distorted square pyramidal geometries. None of these were observed to have a trigonal bipyramidal geometry.

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. The idealized geometry of 5-coordinated tetraaminecopper (II) complexes with another ligand (X); square pyramidal (left, α = β = 180°) and trigonal bipyramidal (right, α = 120°, β = 180°).

Table 3. τ5 parameters of 5-coordinated tetraaminecopper (II)

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_t0003.png 이미지

sp = square pyramid

Out-of-plane Distortion of [Cu(NH3)4]2+

The perpendicular distance from the metal ion to the calculated mean plane of the equatorial donor atoms is known. Table 4 lists the d value, which is the perpendicular distance from the Cu2+ ion to the calculated mean plane of [Cu(NH3)4]2+. However, in the case of [Cu(NH3)4]3[ScF6]2 (No. 34), the calculation could not be conducted because of disordering. From these data, the complex ion of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ with the most out-of-planarity in [Cu(NH3)4]2+ seemed to be [Cu(NH3)4]SO4·H2O (No. 28), whose d value was 0.114. Therefore, the case where the textbook describes the geometry of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ is based only on the relatively unusual geometry of [Cu(NH3)4]2+.

Table 4. Cu-to-meanplane distances (d) for [Cu(NH3)4]2+ (The cases of both d and RMSD equal to 0.000 are omitted)

JCGMDC_2022_v66n1_61_t0004.png 이미지

RMSD = root mean square distances

For Application in Chemical Education Using Computer

In recent years, the geometry of the coordination compounds of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ have been taught using computational chemistry.54 In the article,54 the fifth and sixth bounded atoms were not considered. The data shown in the present study is fundamental to not only preparing learning materials to inform students and teachers about metal complex ions but also for calculations using computational chemistry to teach geometries of coordination compounds exhibiting phenomenon such as the Jahn-Teller effect in Cu(II) complex ions with fifth and sixth coordinated atoms.

Presumed Reasons for the Differences Between Four-, Five-, and Six-coordination

Further discussion on the differences between the four-, five-, and six-coordinate complexes of each [Cu(NH3)4]2+ are of great significance. Focusing on the halogen atoms in counter anions, if F (fluorine) atoms (the smallest among halogens) were present, such as in [Cu(NH3)4]BeF4·H2O (No. 30) and in [Cu(NH3)4]3[ScF6]2 (No. 34), the complexes of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ were five- and six-coordinate geometries. In contrast, if the counter anions included I (iodine) atoms (larger than other halogens), such as in [Cu(NH3)4]I4 (No. 7), [Cu(NH3)4](CuI2)2 (No. 12), [Cu(NH3)4]I2·I2 (No. 14), and [Cu(NH3)4](I3)2 (No. 17), all of them exhibited four-coordinate geometries. Therefore, to form a higher coordinate geometry than four, small atoms in the counter anion may be helpful to allow the construction of five- and six-coordinate geometries by weakening the repulsions between the [Cu(NH3)4]2+ cations and the counter anions in the crystals. Although F-containing anions such as BF4- and PF6- are known to exist, there are no reports on the crystal structures of [Cu(NH3)4]BF4 and [Cu(NH3)4]PF6. Hence, it would be needed that making the synthesis and X-ray crystal analyses of [Cu(NH3)4]BF4 and [Cu(NH3)4]PF6 crystals a challenging task to ensure the reason mentioned above hereafter.

Furthermore, the type of halogen atom is not the only factor determining the coordination number of [Cu(NH3)4]2+. Crystal packing is believed to play an important role in coordination. The previously reported crystals of [Cu(NH3)4]2+, with an organic anion, were only [Cu(NH3)4](C3H2N7O)2 (No. 11), where C3H2N7O- is an anion formed by the deprotonation of 4-amino-3-(5-tetrazolate)-furazan. The synthesis and analysis of crystals with typical organic anions such as CH3COO- and CF3SO3- , linear organic anions, and C6H5COO- and picrate C6H2(NO2)3O- , which have high planarity, may also contribute to a deeper understanding of the reason behind the formation and differences of the four-, five-, and six-coordinates because they may change the crystalline packing.

The effects of the solvent molecules are not sufficiently clear. Only water molecules were included as a solvent in the crystals of [Cu(NH3)4]2+, as reported previously (Table 1). Polar solvents, such as methanol, dimethylsulfoxide, and dimethylformamide can also be used to synthesize solvent-containing crystals in addition to water molecules.

It was demonstrated that the Cu-N distances in [Cu(NH3)4]2+ are approximately 2.0–2.1 Å in the crystalline state. Therefore, it is concluded that a slight difference existed owing to the difference in counter ions or crystalline solvents. In other words, the basic geometry of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ is a fourcoordinate square planar crystal. However, the existence of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ with five- and six-coordinate geometries is also non-negligible in the crystalline state. This tendency of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ to exist as a four-coordinate square planar geometry, and additionally, as a five-coordinate square pyramid and six-coordinate distorted octahedral geometry is similar to that in solution.

The deeper understanding of the structure of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ in the crystalline state reported herein may motivate further studies to use another advanced research material and contribute to the improvement and development of chemical education in the future.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to appreciate anonymous reviewers (JKCS) for useful suggestion, Dr. Hironobu Tahara (Nagasaki University) for offering kind support, Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing, Dr. Keisuke Umakoshi (Nagasaki University) and Mr. Yuto Yabuuchi (University of California, Berkeley) for providing helpful comments to improve the manuscript. Publication cost of this paper was supported by the Korean Chemical Society.

References

  1. Earl, B. L. J. Chem. Educ. 1985, 62, 798. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed062p798.1
  2. Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G.; Gaus, P. L. In Basic Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Son Ltd: Hoboken, New Jersey, U. S. A., 1995; p 580.
  3. Kauffman, G. B. J. Chem. Educ. 1984, 61, 1095. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed061p1095
  4. Shiota, E. In High-Performance and Specialty Fibers; The Society of Fiber Science and Technology, Japan, Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; p 409.
  5. Pickard, L. J.; Harris, M. E. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 1512. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p1512
  6. Patel, D.; Patel, A. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2000, 130, 1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(00)80340-7
  7. Sultana, J.; Sarma, D. Curr. Org. Synth. 2020, 17, 65. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570179417666191223152643
  8. Tripathi, A. In Nature of chemistry, 3rd ed.; Kavya Publications: Bhopal, India, 2021; p 606.
  9. House, J. E. In Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, U. S. A., 2013; p 575.
  10. Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G.; Murillo, C. A.; Bochmann, M. In Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, U. S. A., 1999; p 865.
  11. Berces, A.; Nukada, T.; Margl, P.; Ziegler, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9693. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992612f
  12. Hu, J.; Chen, Q.; Hu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Li, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 12280. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp404768e
  13. Ohtaki, H. Chemistry & Education 2000, 48, 356.
  14. Frank, P.; Benfatto, M.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 4126. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic7021243
  15. Yamaguchi, T.; Ohtaki, H. Bull. Chem Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 415. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.52.415
  16. Saputri, W. D.; Wijaya, K.; Pranowo, H. D.; Hofer, T. S. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 1553. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-1115
  17. Porai-Koshits, M. A.; Bukovska, M. V. Kristallografiya 1961, 6, 381.
  18. Ferrari, A.; Braibanti, A.; Tiripicchio, A. Acta Crystallogr. 1966, 21, 605. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X66003530
  19. Morosin, B.; Fallon, P.; Valentine, J. S. Acta Crystallogr. B 1975, 31, 2220. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740875007285
  20. Baglio, J. A.; Vaughan, P. A. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1970, 32, 803. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(70)80060-4
  21. Morosin, B.; Larson, A. C. Acta Crystallogr. B 1969, 25, 1417. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740869004122
  22. Ang, H.-G.; Fraenk, W.; Karaghiosoff, K.; Klapotke, T. M.; Mayer, P.; Noth, H.; Sprott, J.; Warchhold, M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2002, 628, 2894. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3749(200213)628:13<2894::AID-ZAAC2894>3.0.CO;2-R
  23. Dubler, E.; Linowsky, L. Helv. Chim. Acta 1975, 58, 283. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19750580135
  24. Liu, D.-S.; Liu, S.-F.; Xu, Y.-P.; Huang, G.-S.; Li, X.- F. Acta Crystallogr. E 2007, 63, m625. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807003777
  25. Morosin, B. Acta Crystallogr. B 1976, 32, 1237. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740876005013
  26. Jia, L.-N.; Hou, L. Acta Crystallogr. C 2012, 68, m45. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270112002429
  27. Ding, Z.; Cao, W.; Ma, X.; Hang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, K.; Song, J.; Huang, J. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1175, 373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.07.107
  28. Hoyer, M.; Hartl, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1991, 598, 151. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19915980115
  29. Tebbe, K. F.; Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1982, 489, 93. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19824890112
  30. Koziskova, Z.; Dunaj-Jurco, M.; Gazo, J. Chem. Zvesti 1984, 38, 583.
  31. Porai-Koshits, M. A. Zh. Strukt. Khim. 1963, 4, 584.
  32. Leskela, M.; Valkonen, J. Acta Chem. Scandi. A 1978, 32, 805. https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.32a-0805
  33. Shihsiung, L.; Chinling, H. K'o Hsueh T'ung Pao 1980, 25, 835.
  34. Morosin, B. Acta Crystallogr. B 1969, 25, 19. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740869001725
  35. Gromilov, S. A.; Khranenko, S. P.; Piryazev, D. A.; Kuratieva, N. V. J. Struct. Chem. 2016, 57, 725. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022476616040144
  36. Seferiadis, N.; Dubler, E.; Oswald, H. R. Acta Crystallogr. C 1986, 42, 942. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270186093927
  37. Escorihuela, I.; Falvello, L. R.; Tomas, M. Inorg Chem. 2001, 40, 636. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic000734c
  38. Solanki, D.; Hogarth, G. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1099, 388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.06.038
  39. Sucha, V.; Kuchar, J.; Harms, K. Acta Crystallogr. E 2013, 69, 32. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813011033
  40. Grzimek, V.; Kuchar, J. Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2020, 235, 459. https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2020-0033
  41. Janiak, C.; Wu, H.-P.; Klufers, P.; Mayer, P. Acta Crystallogr. C 1999, 55, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270199010859
  42. Cernak, J.; Chomic, J.; Jurco, M. D. Chem. Zvesti 1990, 44, 13.
  43. Tedenac, J.-C.; Philippot, E.; Maurin, M. Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr. 1975, 98, 36.
  44. Quinones, S. H.; Kaziev, G. Z.; Oreshkina, A. V.; Zavodnik, V. E.; Reyes, M. R.; Sanches, L. A. M. Z. Neorg. Khim. 2005, 50, 1813.
  45. Chrappova, J.; Schwendt, P.; Dudasova, D.; Tatiersky, J.; Marek, J. Polyhedron 2008, 27, 641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2007.10.016
  46. Khranenko, S. P.; Shusharina, E. A.; Gromilov, S. A.; Smolentsev, A. I. J. Struct. Chem. 2009, 50, 1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10947-009-0179-8
  47. Bohmer, N.; Meyer, G. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001, 627, 1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3749(200106)627:6<1248::AID-ZAAC1248>3.0.CO;2-#
  48. Comba, P. In Intermolecular Interactions; Gans, W., Boeyens, J. C. A., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, U. S. A., 1998; p 97.
  49. Comba, P.; Jurisic, P.; Lampeka, Y. D.; Peters, A.; Prikhod'ko, A. I.; Pritzkow, H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 324, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1693(01)00562-X
  50. Bukovska, M.; Porai-Koshits, M. A. J. Struct. Chem. 1961, 2, 655. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00747321
  51. Woidy, P.; Meng, W.; Kraus, F. Z. Naturforsch. 2014, 69b, 1. https://doi.org/10.5560/znb.2014-3291
  52. Blackman, A. G.; Schenk, E. B.; Jelley, R. E.; Krensked, E. H.; Gahan, L. R. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 14798. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0dt02985h
  53. Addison, A. W.; Rao, T. N.; Reedijk, J.; van Rijn, J.; Verschoor, G. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1984, 7, 1349. https://doi.org/10.1039/DT9840001349
  54. Su, W.; Zhu, Y.; Qi, C. Front. Educ. Res. 2021, 4, 2522.