DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Alkali Overdosing in a Lime Neutralization Process for Acid Mine Drainage

  • Cheong, Young-Wook (Geologic Environmental Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Cho, Dong-Wan (Geologic Environmental Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Soo (Mine Reclamation Corporation) ;
  • Hur, Won (Department of Biotech & Bioengineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.09
  • 심사 : 2021.11.30
  • 발행 : 2022.02.10

초록

Lime has been used for the neutralization of acidic waste because it is cheap and available in large quantities. The resulting sludge often contains a considerable amount of unreacted lime due to alkali overdosing, even during automatic neutralization processes, which mainly arises from the poor solubility of lime. The sludge cake from lime neutralization of Ilkwang Mine also contained high percentages of calcium and magnesium. The elemental content of the sludge cake was compared with those obtained from a simulation of the lime neutralization facility installed at Ilkwang Mine. A Goldsim® model estimated the degree of lime overdosing to be 19.1% based on the fractions of ferrous oxide. The analysis suggests that resolubilization of aluminum hydroxide could occur in the settling basin, in which pH exceeded 10 due to the continued dissolution of the overdosed lime. The present study demonstrated that chemical analysis of sludge combined with process simulation could provide a reasonable estimate of mass balance and chemistry in a neutralization facility for acid mine drainage.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the project "Development of enhanced process to improve physico-chemical treatment efficiency of mine drainage" granted by the Mine Reclamation Corporation (Project code: 20-5205).

참고문헌

  1. W. Rudolfs, Acid waste treatment with lime, Ind. Eng. Chem., 35, 227-230 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50398a024
  2. A. Akcil and S. Koldas, Acid Mine Drainage (AMD): Causes, Treatment and Case studies, J. Clean. Prod., 14, 1139-1145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.006
  3. H. Uchiyama, T. Igarashi, K. Asakura, Y. Ochi, F. Ishizuka, and S. Kawada, Acid mine drainage treatment through a two-step neutralization ferrite-formation process in northern Japan: Physical and chemical characterization of the sludge, Miner. Eng., 20, 1309-1314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.08.002
  4. Z. Zeybek, S. Y. Cetinkaya, F. Alioglu, and M. Alpbaz, Determination of optimum operating conditions for industrial dye wastewater treatment using adaptive heuristic criticism pH control, J. Environ. Manage., 85, 404-414 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.013
  5. J. P. Maree, P. Du Plessis, and C. J. Van der Walt, Treatment of acidic effluents with limestone instead of lime, Water Sci. Technol., 26, 345-355 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1992.0414
  6. J. M. Zinck and B. C. Aube, Optimization of lime treatment processes, CIM Bull., 93, 98-105 (2000).
  7. M. Kalin, A. Fyson, and W. N. Wheeler, The chemistry of conventional and alternative treatment systems for the neutralization of acid mine drainage, Sci. Total. Environ., 366, 395-408 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.015
  8. L. Wade, A probabilistic water balance. Ph.D. Dissertation, Montana Tech of The University of Montana, MT, USA (2014).
  9. GoldSim Technology Group, GoldSim User's Guide Version 12.1, GoldSim Technology Group, Redmond, WA, USA (2018).
  10. J. P. Jolivet, C. Chaneac, and E. Tronc, Iron oxide chemistry. From molecular clusters to extended solid networks, Chem. Commun., 7, 481-483 (2004).
  11. E. Lydersen, The solubility and hydrolysis of aqueous aluminium hydroxides in dilute fresh waters at different temperatures, Hydrol. Res., 21, 195-204 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.1990.0015
  12. D. T. Chen, Solubility products of aluminum hydroxide in various ionic solutions, Can. J. Chem., 51, 3528-3533 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1139/v73-525