Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Current Status of Research Data Management by Researchers in Each Academic Field: Focusing on Library and Information Science, Statistics, Ecology, and Korean Musicology

학문분야별 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리 현황에 관한 연구 - 문헌정보학, 통계학, 생태학 및 한국음악학을 중심으로 -

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 연구데이터융복합연구소 ) ;
  • 김선태 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 한연중 (국립산림과학원 임산자원이용연구부) ;
  • 유원재 (국립산림과학원 임산자원이용연구부 ) ;
  • 전바울 (전북대학교 통계학과) ;
  • 양성준 (전북대학교 통계학과(응용통계연구소))
  • Received : 2022.11.21
  • Accepted : 2022.12.14
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As part of open science, the government adopts a national research data sharing and utilization strategy, forms a governance system at the national level, and promotes policies for research institutes to implement. Although the policy for managing research data is carried out centering on the academic world, it is insufficient compared to developed countries, and even this is a reality in which researchers do not have enough awareness to introduce it to the field. The purpose of this study is to understand the research data management status of researchers in each academic field. Academic fields consisted of four fields including Library and Information Science, Statistics, Ecology, and Korean Musicology, and the current status of data management was identified through a survey. The current status of research data management was analyzed from the perspective of research data production, sharing and management, saving, preservation and reuse. As a result of the study, it was found that there were differences by discipline in terms of data production, data sharing and management, data preservation, and data reuse, except for data savings.

오픈 사이언스의 일환으로 정부는 국가 연구데이터 공유 및 활용 전략을 채택하고, 국가 차원의 거버넌스 체제를 구성하여 연구기관이 이행하도록 정책을 추진하고 있다. 연구데이터 관리를 위한 정책이 학계를 중심으로 수행되고 있지만 선진국에 비해 미흡한 실정이며 이 마저도 현장에 도입하기에는 연구자의 인식도 부족한 현실이다. 본 연구의 목적은 학문분야별 연구자의 연구데이터 관리 현황을 파악하기 위함이다. 학문분야는 문헌정보학, 통계학, 생태학 및 한국음악학을 포함한 4개 분야로 구성하였으며 데이터 관리 현황은 설문조사를 통해 파악하였다. 연구데이터 관리 현황은 연구데이터 생산, 공유 및 관리, 저장, 보존 및 재사용 관점에서 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 데이터 저장을 제외하고 데이터 생산, 데이터 공유 및 관리, 데이터 보존 및 데이터 재사용의 경우 학문 분야별로 차이가 있는 것으로 파악되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by National University Promotion Program at Jeonbuk National University in 2021

References

  1. Kim, Sungwook & Kim, Suntae (2020). A study on the research data management methods for the condensed matter physics. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(3), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.3.077
  2. Lee, Hyewon (2007). A Study on the Event-Driven ABC Ontology Extension Model for Music Resources. Doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University.
  3. Lee, Seong-sook (2010). A Method for Applying the FRBR Model According to the Bibliographical Characteristics of Korean Traditional Music. Daejeon: National Research Foundation of Korea.
  4. National R&D information processing standard. Ministry of Science and ICT Notice. No. 2020-102.
  5. Park, Miyoung, Ahn, Inja, & Nam, Seungjoo (2018). A study on the analysis of research data management and sharing of science & technology government-funded research institutes. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(4), 319-344. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.4.319
  6. Park, Yunmi & Kim, Jihyun (2021). A study on research data creation and management by researchers in mechanical engineering. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(4), 137-162. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.4.137
  7. Roh, Tae-ho, Hong, Seon-gi, Kang, Dae-seok, & Kwon, Oh-seok [Co-translated] (2000). Ecology: Man and Nature. Seoul: Academy Books.
  8. Barabucci, G., Eschweiler, M., & Speer, A. (2018) TI-One: active research data management in a modern philosophy department. 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), 2018, 314-315. https://doi:10.1109/eScience.2018.00070.
  9. Collaborative Research Group (CRG) USA (2016). Top 10 Characteristics and Features of the Social Sciences. Available: https://crgsoft.com/10-characteristics-of-the-social-sciences/
  10. DBBM [n.d.]. Characteristics of Biological Data. Available: http://www.dbbm.fiocruz.br/class/Lecture/d17/db_overview/characteristics_of_biological_data.htm
  11. Donaldson, D. R. & Koepke, J. W. (2022). A focus groups study on data sharing and research data management. Sci Data. 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01428-w
  12. JISC, University of Glasgow, & DCC (2009). Data Asset Framework Implementation Guide. Available: https://www.data-audit.eu/docs/DAF_Implementation_Guide.pdf
  13. Krahe M. A., Toohey J., Wolski M., Scuffham P. A., & Reilly, S. (2020). Research data management in practice: results from a cross-sectional survey of health and medical researchers from an academic institution in Australia. 19th Australasian Research Management Society Conference, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358319831318
  14. Milewska, A., Wisniewska, N., Cimoszko, P., & Rusakow, J. (2022). A survey of medical researchers indicates poor awareness of research data management processes and a role  for data librarians. Health Info Libr J, 39(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12403
  15. Raszewski, R., Goben, A., Bergren, M., Jones, K., Ryan, C., Steffen, A., & Vonderheid, S. (2020). A survey of current practices in data management education in nursing doctoral programs. Journal of Professional Nursing. 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.06.003.
  16. UCLA Library [n.d.]. Data Management for the Social Sciences. Available: https://guides.library.ucla.edu/data-management-social-sciences
  17. University of Washington (2022). Learning Research Data Management with the UW Libraries. Available: https://sites.uw.edu/libstrat/2022/03/23/learning-research-data-management-with-the-uw-libraries
  18. Wiley, C. & Burnette, M. (2019). Assessing data management support needs of bioengineering and biomedical research faculty. Journal of eScience Librarianship. 8. e1132. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2019.1132
  19. Wiley, C. & Mischo, W. (2016). Data Management Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric Scientists and Engineering Faculty. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1688