Journal of Auto-vehicle Safety Association (자동차안전학회지)

Korean Auto-vehicle Safety Association (한국자동차안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on AES Performance Assessment Protocol based on Car-to-car cut-out Scenario According to front Emergency Obstacle Avoidance of Preceding Vehicle during Highway Driving

고속도로 주행 시 선행차량의 전방 긴급 장애물 회피에 따른 Car-to-Car Cut-out 시나리오 기반 AES 성능평가 방법 연구

  • 김진석 (숭실대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 이동훈 (숭실대학교 기계공학과)
  • Received : 2022.06.27
  • Accepted : 2022.12.09
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the popularization of autonomous driving technology, safety has emerged as a more important criterion. However, there are no assessment protocol or methods for AES (Autonomous Emergency Steering). So, this study proposes AES assessment protocol and scenario corresponding to collision avoidance Car-to-Car scenario of Euro NCAP in order to prepare for obstacles that appear after the emergency steering of LV (Leading Vehicle) avoiding obstacles in front of. Autoware-based autonomous driving stack is developed to test and simulate scenario in CARLA. Using developed stack, it is confirmed that obstacle avoidance is successfully performed in CARLA, and the AES performance of VUT (Vehicle Under Test) is evaluated by applying the proposed assessment protocol and scenario.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2021년도 정부(산업통상자원부)의 재원으로 한국산업기술 진흥원의 지원을 받아 수행되었음(P0017123, 2021년 데이터분석기반의전자제조전문인력양성사업).

References

  1. SHIN, Donghoon, et al., 2018, "Human-centered risk assessment of an automated vehicle using vehicular wireless communication", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 20, No. 2 pp. 667~681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2823744
  2. LI, Guofa, et al., "Risk assessment based collision avoidance decision-making for autonomous vehicles in multi-scenarios", Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, Vol. 122, No. 102820.
  3. Euro NCAP, 2022, "Assessment Protocol - VRU", "AEB Car-to-Car Test Protocol."
  4. IIHS, 2013, "Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol."
  5. Cicchino, Jessica B., 2017, "Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates", Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 99, pp. 142~152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
  6. Fildes, Brian, et al., 2015, "Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in realworld rear-end crashes", Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 81, pp. 24~29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029
  7. Choi, JunYoung, Kang, SeungSu, Park, EunAh, Lee, KangWon, Lee, SiHun, Cho, SooKang, and Kwon, YoungGil, 2019, "Study on Effectiveness of Accident Reduction Depending on Autonomous Emergency Braking System", Korean Auto-vehicle Safety Association, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 6~10.
  8. Schratter, Markus, Daniel Watzenig, and Michael Hartmann, 2019, "Pedestrian Collision Avoidance System for Autonomous Vehicles", SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 279~293.
  9. Schratter, Markus, Daniel Watzenig, and Michael Hartmann, 2019, "Pedestrian Collision Avoidance System for Autonomous Vehicles", SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles, Vol. 2, No. 4 pp. 279~293.
  10. Ackermann, Carlo, et al., 2014, "Collision avoidance with automatic braking and swerving", IFAC proceedings volumes, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 10694~10699. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.00353
  11. Euro NCAP, 2015, "ZERO, IN PURSUIT OF VISION", Euro NCAP 2025 Roadmap.